Preview

The Constitutional Convention

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Constitutional Convention
The Formation U.S. of the Constitution

How did the The United States Constitution overcome the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and provide for the organization of the new government? In the 1780s the United States created their first formal government after the colonist won the revolutionary war against the British.The Article of Confederation was a unicameral legislature also every state had a single vote and gave more power to the states not the central government. The Constitutional convention was about how a state can be represented in the legislature and a compromise between the Virginia plan and the New Jersey plan. That Federalist wanted to ratify the constitution to have a stronger central government, but the anti
…show more content…
The Great compromise was one of the key arguments at the Constitutional convention. The Larger states had a bigger population when they added slaves, they would have more votes than the smaller states. The larger states like the Virginia plan because it was favoring the larger states. The New Jersey plan also William Paterson favored it. They wanted all states to have an equal vote one vote.The New Jersey plan was favored for the smaller states. The people would vote for the representative government or legislators. The larger states wanted more power in the legislature. They wanted to count slaves, but since they are slaves, they didn't count, so the counted ⅗ compromise so ⅗ slaves were counted as 3 …show more content…
The Debate over the constitution was important for the entire United States. Anti Federalist were people who didn't want to ratify the constitution. They didn't want to give the central government more power scared it could turn into Britain. There scared they will cripple the state's power so they have little control. Federalist were people who wanted to ratify the constitution. The federalist wanted a stronger central government so that it has more control over the states. The articles gave the central government with very little power so they want to ratify it. The important Federalist were John Jay, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. They were Strong supporters of the Constitution . They wrote an 85 page essay in the New York newspaper to get New York citizens to ratify the constitution. That Debating the Constitution was important for our country in its first stages of a of developing a government equal for all and also what didn't work for the articles work for this government.

That the Articles of Confederation, The constitutional convention and The debate over the Constitution were very important for the colonist to develop an equal, fair and working government for all Americans. That The Articles of Confederation was the Nation's first government, but didn’t work well.The debate on the Constitution was where we got our first real government formed there. The debate over the constitution

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At Philadelphia in 1778, John Dickinson drafted the first constitution for the United States as a nation. The Articles of Confederation was adopted by Congress in 1777 and submitted to the states for ratification. When Virginia and New York agreed to give up their claims to western lands, the Articles of Confederation were finally ratified in March 1781. The Articles established a central government that consisted of just one body, a congress. In this unicameral nation, the power given to states had greater power than the Federal power. Under the Articles of Confederation America was a weak nation without unity, which caused many problems to arise.…

    • 799 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The people of early America had many faults and strengths after becoming free from England. They wanted to create a government different from England’s so the Americans could have more rights. To do this, the articles of confederation had no executive branch, congress didn’t have the power to tax directly which made it hard to support their own country, to change a law, it had to be unanimous and to pass a law 2/3 of the colonies had to agree which made it practically impossible to change or make laws and overall the country was just unbalanced. The first official form of government of America, The Articles of Confederation, was one of the disputable topics whether or not it was a good form of government. Evidence that proved the articles was an effective form of government was the spreading of land westward. On the other hand, there were many more ineffective ways the articles didn’t work, like Americas affairs with foreign countries like England and Spain and its economy.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At the Constitutional Convention, the Convention's resolutions on national legislative authority were particularized into a series of enumerated powers. This meant that under federal law these powers can only govern matters within the terms of some power-granting clause of the Constitution. By adding the Necessary and Proper Clause, the Founding Fathers set the criteria for laws that, may not necessarily be within the terms of other grants, serve to make other federal powers effective. The necessary and proper clause may grant power to congress if it is deemed to reinforce the great powers outlined in the enumerated powers.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a consequence of 25 of the 55 convention delegates being slave owners, whether or not slaves should be counted into the state population was up for debate. Following the Great Compromise, the three-fifths compromise was created in order to allow southern states to count each enslaved individual as three-fifths of a person. This extra boost in population gave states such as Virginia, South Carolina, and North Carolina - where a large percentage of their population was slaves - more representation in the House of Representatives so that neither the northern or southern states fully got their way. Another indirect compromise between the Southern and Northern states and the framers of the constitution was the agreement to not allow the word “slave” to be written directly into the constitution. The inclusion of slavery into their constitution would be contradictory to their political ideas of the American Revolution of…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States addresses the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation because it established the federal treasury, it is a product of careful consideration, and it compromises with the wants of anti-federalist…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    We were to examine our Founder and dig deep into their personal views and trepidations in order to represent them accurately and verbally express their concerns in hopes to help mold the Constitution. The Founder chosen for me was George Read who represented the state of Delaware. Understanding his concerns was not a difficult task, because I too am from Delaware and understand the hardships of growing up in a small state. We had to take into consideration the other states’ views. Some of the larger states had ideologies that differed greatly from those of the smaller states. Objectives of the Southern States contrasted those of the Eastern States. A new national government was the goal of the Convention, but many conflicts arose before a decision and a widely reviewed Constitution could be…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore the Three-Fifths Compromise was establishes in 1787 with respect to slaves. Because of this tensions arose between the thirteen colonies. The results of the slavery compromise resulted in 600,000 deaths between the North and South. Additionally the Three-Fifths Compromise determined the number of representatives their reasoning being every five slaves would be counted as three. This was simply a methodical way of determining the vote.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The constitutional convention helped solve many issues between the states through compromising. However, it also created many problems. The four main issues discussed were; What form will our government take to avoid any one person or group having all of the power? How will we structure the government to keep each ruling group or person from becoming corrupt? How will the states be represented? And lastly, should this new government outlaw slavery?…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a new generation take into place, new outcomes need to be face and the world need to be prepare with new rules, but this change depends upon you, the society, to become possible. The Constitutional Convention was created to fix the problems that was facing the Articles of Confederation were the thirteen states became a confederation with a weak central government that gave some of their powers to the national government. Delegates, people who represented what the society wants, decided to not only helped with the Articles of Confederation, but also propose a new American government. During the Constitutional Convention, delegates also discussed how much power should be giving to the people, national versus state government, big states versus…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitution is once created in 1787 is now still used by the country of The United States of America today. Now a great accomplishment, it took a little more than just one draft to be able to ratify it. The states that didn’t ratify the constitution at first definitely choice right compared to the states that agreed first. The states that didn’t ratify in the beginning chose wisely for with first ratifying there would not have been things such as. The reason is if they would have immediately agreed on the first draft of the constitution there would not have been any base rights that the citizens would have. 1“...the document lacked a legitimate Bill of Rights which would protect the rights of States and…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Three-Fifths Compromise

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The ratification of the United States Constitution depended on the agreement of the North and the South, and the issue of slavery was a major obstruction to this agreement. Each state’s representation was determined by the number of person’s residing in that state. The North did not want to count the slaves as part of this number because it would mean less representation for them in the government. Their argument was that since slaves were considered property, they should be equated with other chattel property, like cattle and mules. The South, on the other hand, was determined to count slaves into their population due to the high proportion of slaves in the southern region of the country. Without the support of the South, the ratification of the Constitution was doubtful, so the 3/5 Compromise was written. Article 1, section 2 of the Constitution states that “population for the purposes of representation and taxation would be determined by adding the whole number of free people, including indentured servants, plus 3/5 of all slaves”. This was also called The Enumeration Clause.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays