The Controversy Of Banning Teenagers
“Why are you doing this to us? This isn’t fair! Teenagers aren’t the only people who can be loud and obnoxious! Why don’t you ban your loud customers and not just teenagers?” While teenagers have a reputation for being rude and noisy, that doesn’t mean it’s true for all of them. The same can also be said about how adults behave in public places. Restaurants, like Munchy’s downtown near Springfield
High School, feel that banning their adolescent customers during lunchtime would help to resolve their financial problems. However, businesses should not have the right to ban teenagers because teenagers are still customers and the ban is based on
Stereotypes.
Teenagers should not be discriminated from any restaurant or store because they are paying …show more content…
Due to their reckless behaviour towards everyone and anything it does oppose a problem for everyone else. Banning teenagers seems as the logical answer for Mr.Jones but is it really effective?It’s true that not all students go to the mall with money to spend. They would rather stay at the mall then go home or back to class.The kids who don’t buy today may buy something the next time they visit.While there are many teenagers who are loud and messy, there are just as many teenagers who are quiet and respectful. The same can be said about business people.Source 3, Para 3 “Business people who spend more money on their lunches and need a peaceful break from their busy days can finally go back to their restaurant without having the fear of noisy and rude high school interrupting their quiet time.There’s a grain of truth to every stereotype, but you can’t always judge people in that way.Teenagers represent potential customers and not all of them conform to the typical stereotype, therefore businesses shouldn’t ban teenage customers from their …show more content…
The perspective of the restaurant owner, Mr. Jones, on his teenage customers is unfair and stereotypical meaning his ban on student customers is going to be ineffective. Therefore, let’s show Mr. Jones that his teenage customers are just as influential as his adult customers by boycotting Munchy’s restaurant from November 18 to 25,
High School, feel that banning their adolescent customers during lunchtime would help to resolve their financial problems. However, businesses should not have the right to ban teenagers because teenagers are still customers and the ban is based on
Stereotypes.
Teenagers should not be discriminated from any restaurant or store because they are paying …show more content…
Due to their reckless behaviour towards everyone and anything it does oppose a problem for everyone else. Banning teenagers seems as the logical answer for Mr.Jones but is it really effective?It’s true that not all students go to the mall with money to spend. They would rather stay at the mall then go home or back to class.The kids who don’t buy today may buy something the next time they visit.While there are many teenagers who are loud and messy, there are just as many teenagers who are quiet and respectful. The same can be said about business people.Source 3, Para 3 “Business people who spend more money on their lunches and need a peaceful break from their busy days can finally go back to their restaurant without having the fear of noisy and rude high school interrupting their quiet time.There’s a grain of truth to every stereotype, but you can’t always judge people in that way.Teenagers represent potential customers and not all of them conform to the typical stereotype, therefore businesses shouldn’t ban teenage customers from their …show more content…
The perspective of the restaurant owner, Mr. Jones, on his teenage customers is unfair and stereotypical meaning his ban on student customers is going to be ineffective. Therefore, let’s show Mr. Jones that his teenage customers are just as influential as his adult customers by boycotting Munchy’s restaurant from November 18 to 25,