Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Death Penalty Argumentative Essay

Good Essays
499 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
Abolish Death Penalty Although death penalty is a fair punishment, I am against it because it is another form of murder which is an inhumane act. Death penalty is capital punishment wherein a criminal proven guilty of a major crime is sentenced to death by the government. I am against the death penalty and can prove in my essay that abolishing it would be a better choice. Death penalty decreases crime for the reason that people fear nothing more than death (Van Den Haag, 1983). By executing criminals, the people are protected from future crimes. Although it is a logical reason, there is no credible evidence that the death penalty decreases crimes (ACLU, 2007). States that practice death penalty do not lower crime rates compared to states which have only life time imprisonment as the highest form of punishment. Both punishments show the same results as thoroughly researched by the social science research in America (ACLU, 2007). Crimes interfere with the peace and order of a society (Budziszewski, 2004). Appropriate punishment which is just and equitable can restore the peace and order. Making the criminal pay for the crime with an equivalent punishment is acceptable. But killing a person who killed another person is just making the violent act again in another form (Schroth, 2008). In terms of cost, death penalty costs more than life time imprisonment. A person sentenced to death pays more because of more trials, resulting to more fees. Capital punishment requires more trials because a life will be taken away (Dieter, 2007). The death penalty also risks an innocent life being sentenced to death. Some who agree with the death penalty says that everybody makes mistakes and the death penalty should not be abolished for that reason (Stewart, 2008). Since life is the greatest thing that can be taken away from a person, one innocent life must not suffer death in place of the true criminal. When life is at hand, risking it is not an option (Feingold, 2000). Lastly, death penalty is morally accepted because it is a way of justice for the victims. The society would gain back its peace and order when the criminals are never to be seen in this earth again (Fein, 2008). On the contrary, killing is a sin; there is no doubt about it. Humans become inhumane and immoral when they take away another human life. Death penalty is immoral also for the fact that it is not fair for everybody. Criminals who are rich can buy their way out of their punishment (Stevenson, 2004). The death penalty should be abolished and should never be an option of punishment. Life time imprisonment without patrol can be equivalent and satisfying way of punishment for the criminals. In conclusion, life time imprisonment should be the highest form of punishment instead of death.

Reference
ACLU. (Apr. 9, 2007). The death penalty: Questions and answers. ACLU.org. Retrieved March 16, 2012, from http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=002000.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is assumed to deter crime. Yet, Sstudies in 2012 decisively showed that murder is 30% more likely to occur in states implementing the death penalty.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Crime is a major problem in our world today. Some people in our country live in fear that they will be the next victim of a crime; they could be robbed, raped, or even murdered. There are so many theories on how to stop crime. One of the theories is the use of the death penalty as a deterrent. There are a lot of issues that surround that idea that make the use of the death penalty just as bad as the accused committing murder. It is very contradictive, inconsistent, and unethical. Although some people believe that the death penalty deters crime, there are many arguments against it. For example, the costs are extremely high, racism is involved, and there are innocent people on death row to list a few.…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, there are serious economic consequences. Various state governments estimate that a single death penalty case, from the point of arrest to execution costs $1 million to $7 million per case. The million dollars spent on capital punishment cuts into resources for other community interests, such as schools, hospitals, public safety and…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Opponents of the capital punishment also claim that the whole principle of the death penalty is overshadowed by the proven risk of executing innocent people and that the avoidable killing of such people can never be justified. And according to Amnesty International, there were more than 400 known cases of wrongful convictions for capital offenses in the U.S. between 1900 and 1991. These facts will of course make a good standing point for the opponents of the capital punishment but its supporters argue that these problems are caused not by the principle itself but its failed implementation and that the opponents use such cases to cloud the real issue.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Innocent people that are found guilty for a crime and are executed as a result will suffer an infinite loss of welfare, leading to a fall in the level of optimal capital punishment (Cameron 1989). Not only this but it adds a cost to society as people will pay more to prove themselves innocent as the real offenders will gain because their expected probability of punishment will decrease; this is know as the innocence externality theory (Cameron 1989). Since the turn of the century it has been found that at least 23 people have been wrongfully executed (Giarratano 1991) with the possibility of more that are unknown, all of which will not be able to receive compensation in exchange for the wrongful doing. These mistakes have happened due to reasons including misleading and suppressed evidence, untrustworthy confessions, perjury, mistaken eyewitnesses, or an incompetent defence counsel (Giarratano 1998). Many of these mistakes could have been corrected with a longer execution delay, but legislation believed that lowering this delay has more of a positive impact on social costs and was therefore decreased in 1996 as stated above (Shepherd 1004). Even though capital punishment can decrease the crime rate, the risk of executing even one innocent person should be a large enough reason to consider implementing other forms of strict…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty uses an unnecessary amount of America’s budget. The amount of money we spend on the death penalty could be put to better use. “Death penalty cases are much more expensive than other criminal cases and cost more than imprisonment for life with no possibility of parole. A study in Kansas indicated that a capital trial costs $116,700 more than an ordinary…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    final exam

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This report is solely for your information, and is not to be used for any other purpose, nor to be distributed to…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death penalty is the punish meant of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime and there are twenty-two countries in the world that still impose the death penalty for capital crimes, the United states is one of them. If you are charged with capital homicide, and the jury of twelve of your peers proclaims, “We find the defendant guilty as charged”(Condenaststore). Then it is simple, you are going to forfeit your life, so abolishing the death penalty or there’s no coming back from the grave.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But does murder solve murders? According to multiple scientific studies, they don’t. In fact, in states without the death penalty, the crime rate is lower than the states that do. North Carolina’s crime rates dropped almost immediately after executions stopped. In a 2008 survey, criminologists and police chiefs around the country ranked the use of the death penalty at the bottom of a list of effective crime fighting tools. They said that more law enforcement resources were the most needed tool for reducing violent…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O 'Connor said in a speech in 2001 to a group of women lawyers in Minnesota "the system may well be allowing some innocent defendants to be executed” (“Innocence”). It has been said that if capital punishment disappears in the United States it won’t be because voters and politicians no longer want to execute the guilty (Douthat 7). It will be because they 're afraid of executing the innocent (Douthat 7). "A government that cannot guarantee the absolute accuracy of its proceedings should not take to itself the power of taking a human life," said Senator Martin Looney, referring to the Tillman case (Williams 55-56). While interviewing certain people about this issue there was a statement made by a person that really caught my attention she said “...The death penalty should not be a closure to a family because another person is being killed, when God should be the one making that decision. Remember, two wrongs don’t make a…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a method that the justice system uses to punish wrong doers for centuries, but as of late has become a hot issue of debate. There are many reasons that surround the debate of the death penalty one of them being due to the harshness of the punishment itself. People against the death penalty argue that the death penalty is a violation of the 8th amendment due to it being a cruel and an unusual punishment. Others argue that it is not. Some argue if the cost of the death penalty is worth it while others argue that it is. Although both have their own views, in the end, the death penalty is nonetheless a useless tool for safety.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deterrent Death Penalty

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The authors, Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L Akers, Professors of Sociology, Center for Studies in Criminology and Law, University of Florida, explains that America’s top criminologist has demonstrated that the death penalty does little to reduce rates of criminal violence. They used statistics gathered over the years about the death penalty and deterrent effects and used those to ask questions to criminologist, general public, and police chiefs. By using many expert opinions they seem unbiased. These statistics would help support one of the lack of deterrent effect of the death penalty.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays