Preview

The Death Penalty Justice For None Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1055 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Death Penalty Justice For None Analysis
1. The tittle “The Death Penalty: Justice for None” the author provokes a feeling to the readers of compassion and empathy making it seem like the death penalty is completely ignorant and wrong no matter what the consequence of the criminal is. The authors opinion about the death penalty is that the death penalty in the united states shouldn’t even be considered an option because it is cruel and unjust.

2. a) The author starts the essay with an illustration a short story to be specific she talks about how Lorenzo Norwood is mentally challenged, unstable and irresponsible. The writer makes you picture the scenario of how he went into a convenience store and ended up getting beat because he was a few cents short when trying to buy a bottle
…show more content…
The first method of proof I have noticed she uses very much is reference to authority. The author uses this in multiple paragraphs such as the death penalty information center, Bureau of justice statistics, sister Prejean author of the book “dead man walking”, supreme court justice Thurgood Marshall and a couple of others. This helps to make the essay seem more legitimate and people of authority agree so why aren’t we? The second method of proof she uses is statistics she uses a lot of research and cites many things mostly numerical like percentages for example “the south carried out 80% of the total executions”, “98 % of prosecutors responsible for death penalty…”, etc. This particular method supports her opinion because she is proving that pricier doesn’t always mean better. Heather is speaking of how the south carried out more executions but there was a bigger rate of murder down in the south. Finally, the last method of proof the author uses is use of comparison or contrast for example, she wrote, “if he had lived in Canada, western Europe, or most south American countries Lorenzo Norwood would have received a prison term” or “In Texas, a death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning a high-risk offender for forty years.” Using this methods of proof the author is brainwashing the readers into agreeing that the death penalty is costly and …show more content…
The first Persuasive technique Heather has used is definitely fright she includes many scary facts, and stories to keep us, the readers, interested and on side with her argument. For example, she talks about a man being executed via lethal injection and during the process the needle pooped out of his vein and they had to do it multiple times until he was finally out. This gruesome story convinces the readers that death penalty is sadistic. Second persuasive technique I believe would be figures of speech and rhetorical devices, she uses situational irony writing, “in the almost thirty years since Marshall made this pronouncement support for the death penalty has increased to an all-time high”. This makes it seem like the death penalty is just too much work and it would be a lot easier to just prison criminals. Another example could be allusion “television series like law and order” and there’s imagery as well “hunter coughed, gasped, and convulsed in adverse reaction to the lethal drugs”. The last persuasive technique I have noticed she uses is diction she sets a tone and mood of loss of faith in America, it’s a very pessimistic and negative tone. This makes the essay very biased only revealing one side of the story. She makes us the readers feel resentful, angry, irritated, abandoned, outrages and sympathetic throughout the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty is one of the controversial topics being widely discussed today. Anna Quindlen is one of many people who opposes the death penalty. She is a crime buff who has worked as a reporter for decades in some of the worst areas of New York. In her article, "Death Penalty's False Promise: An Eye for an Eye," she states how the death penalty and her have nothing in common. She claims that the killing of one human being as punishment for the killing of another makes no sense and is inherently immoral. She tries to relate to her readers by using imagery, stating her opinions, and by appealing to the emotions of her readers. Throughout her argument, she also uses many examples to back up her opinions. She gives examples of situations that appeal to her readers sentiments and makes them feel connected to the…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Paine DQs

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page

    8. In the third paragraph, Paine uses his own experience to argue a point. What point does he make in telling his readers about the tavernkeeper at Amboy?…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Earle’s argument for being against the death penalty is in a story format that persuades the reader to feel what he is feeling. The primary argument in this essay is that people change, and if the purpose of prison is rehabilitation, then rehabilitated prisoners on death row should be able to live. Earle’s argument is very emotional rather than having a lot of logic. He uses pathos to convey how the death penalty…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lori Ornellas argues why more states should enforce the death penalty using two linked premises to support her conclusion. First, she states that “Opponents…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is regarded as one of the United States' hottest topics. Those for and against it constantly debate over the various issues that capital punishment brings forth. This essay explains just a few of these topics and my view on the death penalty.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article “To Kill or Not to Kill” by Scott Turrow was written to examine the fairness and effectiveness of the capital punishment system. The author believes that it is important to address this issue because the current system is very flawed and cannot be trusted with consistent results, the author looked closely for the arguments of for and against the death penalty . In one of the first arguments that ambivalence in the death penalty is something that people have struggled through throughout the years, he uses statistics and percentages as well as emotional appeal to point people who are both for and against the death penalty in the same direction, As Turrow’s said “Many Americans question the system's over-all fairness and its ability…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay Death and Justice, Edward Koch argues in support of capital punishment, he believes it is just and it saves lives. He successfully delivers an argument laced with true and vivid examples of unforgettable murderous events. His intended audience consists of the opposing voters and readers of the New Republic, the political magazine that published his essay. Prior to reading Edward Koch’s essay I was sure that I would disagree but it became clear to me that he is right. There are seven commonly held views against the death penalty that Koch argues against in his essay. In what follows I discuss a few of his arguments and show that the death penalty is the most viable approach to deal with convicted murderers.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sitting down at his computer writing his argumentative essay about the death penalty, Kyle Gibson, the author of “Death penalty Repeal: It is Necessary to Use Capital Punishment in a Free World Image Credit: ilawyerblog.com” (Gibson, 2013), does a very good job stating his opinion about the death penalty and why he thinks it should be enforced, but does not seem credible doing so. Although he is very appealing to the people who are for the death penalty, he could have done a better job reaching out to those who are against the death penalty. It is important as a writer that he appeals to his audience in every way possible emotionally, statistically and credibly to persuade his readers into agreeing with his opinion. Although Kyle Gibson does a great job with Pathos, he could do a better job with bringing out Logos and Ethos in his editorial.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cost of the Death Penalty

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if any, that it has on deterrence. He closely examines the public's support of the death penalty and questions the morality of the death penalty. Finally, Costanzo provides his own resolution and alternative to the death penalty. Each of these items allows the reader an easy, and once again, neat view of how the death penalty can work against out society rather than for it.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    It’s so hard to say where I stand with the death penalty. There are those moments when a person commits a crime so heinous you’re in that state of mind of wanting the death penalty for them. But then you realize this is a human being. I truly do not believe in the death penalty. To me, I think executing someone for a various form of wrongdoing would not punish them. Instead I think that’s just taking them out of their misery. The punishment for doing something wrong that is, for that the person committing such an act, should not be killed but put through suffering by living in jail for the rest of their life. It’s tough, and honestly people have their opinions and it’s in their right to go with or without the death penalty. Capital punishment is one of life 's topics that leave many divided opinions due to its risqué nature. It has been a subject full of controversy for centuries and still continues to be discussed to this day. Throughout my piece I will explain the case that is pro Capital Punishment, as well as the contrasting side - the opposition.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans have for a long time been in favor of capital punishment for convicted murderers. In a 1981 Gallup Poll, two-thirds of Americans spoke their opinion for the Death Penalty (Radelet, Akers, 1996). These polls have determined that most Americans are very clear about the issue that the Death Penalty is justified punishment for murder. The justification suggests that murderers should be executed for the killing alone, murderers should suffer, and just…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ProCon.Org. (2009, January 1). Should the death penalty be used for retribution? Retrieved October 24, 2011, from http://deathpenatly.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001004: http://deathpenatly.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=001004…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty in general is very controversial on whether it should actually still take place or not. The “Death Penalty” by David Bruck was originally printed on May 20, 1985 in the New Republic. David Bruck is focusing on how to accomplish justice without using the electric chair or lynching. He uses ethos but mainly pathos appeal to argue his point. Frank Keating has a completely different idea on this matter. His article “Why I Support Capital Punishment” was published in 2000 by Human Events Publishing. He discusses all his opinions on why the death penalty should occur, while defending his state on capital punishment. To argue his opinions on executing someone he uses ethos and logos appeal. David Bruck’s claims are more effective than Frank Keating’s solely because he is able to appeal to the reader’s emotions.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays