How They Affected Their Lives In A Doll’s House and “Eveline,” Nora and Eveline confront unique circumstances that require vital decisions to be made. Pain, hatred, death of a parent, and dissatisfactions haunt the women’s thoughts and lives. The struggles the ladies face definitely become part of who they are as a person and how they put their thoughts together. Although each must act as a supporter, mother, care provider, and nurturer for their families, they realize how strenuous of a task it is and the need for individual satisfaction. Their lives are anything but normal, and although they have quite a lot in common, the differences in Eveline and Nora are obvious and surely come into play in. So, because Nora and Eveline both have troublesome life issues to overcome, they each must make drastic decisions that will affect their lives forever. In these stories Nora and Eveline confront seriously painful issues at home. In “A Doll’s House”, seemingly rebellious Nora Helmer is treated like a child, and not the responsible adult she puts on the façade of being. The source of this treatment is Torvald Helmer, Nora’s shallow and once sickly husband. Because it is obvious that Helmer sees Nora as an irresponsible teenager, Nora feels forced to lie to him about fickle situations only to later camouflage her lies. For example, toward the beginning of Act One, Nora tells Mrs. Linde that the previous winter, Nora had earned some extra money by locking herself up in a room and doing copying work. This is true unlike the story she told Helmer of her being locked up making Christmas tree ornaments. Nora’s lies eventually become a massive burden. Along with Nora, Eveline Hill also encounters agonizing domestic abuse in “Eveline.” From childhood to present time, Eveline’s father is presented as physically and emotionally abusive and disrespectful: “When they were growing up, he had never gone for her, like he used to go for Harry and Ernest, because she was a girl; but laterly he had begun to threaten her and say what he would do to her only for her dead mother’s sake” (Joyce 1169). Annoyed by the disrespect, Eveline considers moving from Ireland to Buenos Aires, Argentina with her fiance, Frank because she feels that once she moves “. . . in a distant unknown country, it would not be like that. Then she would be married. . . People would treat her with respect then”(Joyce 1169). This appears to be a fine idea at first but Eveline later realizes if she actually does move to be with Frank, her promise made to her deceased mother, to take care of her father and brothers, will be broken. Nora and Eveline may share similar obstacles of life, but they each have unique character traits that show through their decisions and how they react to these obstacles. Nora deals with being sneaky, just as a rebellious teenager. At the beginning of the play, she is seen eating out of a bag of macaroons. Later, Helmer asks her if she had gone to the candy store to get sweets. “You know I could never think of going against you” , Nora replies (Ibsen 1024; act 1). To the audience, this is obviously a lie. Not only is Nora deceitful, but she is also unmindful when it comes to the decisions she makes. At one time, Helmer was deathly ill and needed to be taken to the south to be healed. Nora decides to borrow two hundred, fifty pounds from Nils Krogstad, a lawyer who works at the bank with Helmer, to afford this trip to the south. This appears as a good idea, but is revealed to be a poor choice later in the play. Unlike Nora, Eveline is mature and thoughtful. Eveline obviously thinks highly of Frank: “Now, in a dusty fallen world, she hopes for salvation and thinks at first that the Messiah may indeed have arrived: Frank . . . ‘would take her in his arms, . . . He would save her’”(Hart1). Although Frank is so dear to her, Eveline keeps in mind that because of her mother’s death, she must act as a nurturer for her brothers and take care of her father. Therefore, she takes time to contemplate and consider the consequences before making this choice. The decisions made by both Nora and Eveline are vital and require much thought. As previously stated, Nora decided to borrow money from Krogstad for the trip to the south to save Helmer’s life. Not only did she simply borrow money, she forged her deceased father’s signature to get the money. This is a fatal crime and could cost Nora a lot, her life even. Eveline decides that moving to Argentina with Frank is not wise, and staying in Ireland with her family is the best choice. She realizes that if she had gone through with this plan, she would have proven herself to be disloyal to her family. Not only is she concerned with staying to take care of her father and brothers, Eveline finds herself “. . . unable to disregard the promise to fulfill her duty, ‘keep the home together,’ and inhabit Mrs. Hill’s own doomed role (including her nervous breakdown), Eveline is condemning herself to a life of Oedipal inhibition” (Trudell 1). Not only do the decisions of these ladies affect them individually, they affect their families as well. Though Nora’s choice seriously affects her family, the affect it has on Helmer is anything but serious: “The play depicts the father not only as absent but also as morally polluted” (Rosefeldt 1). Therefore, Helmer is worried about how he will be perceived after Nora’s lies are discovered by their peers, rather than the well being of his wife. This frustrates Nora, causing her to exhibit culturally abominable behavior. By the end of the play, Nora abandons her family: “ The woman’s eyes are opened; and instantly her doll’s dress is thrown off and her husband is left staring at her, helpless, bound thenceforth either to do without her. . . . fully recognizing that he is not a creature of one superior species. . . . Nora’s departure is no claptrap ‘Farewell for ever’, but a journey in search of self-respect and apprenticeship to life” (Shaw 1). Helmer is then left to realize “ ‘There are two kinds of spiritual law […] one in man and one in woman […] but the woman is judged in practical matters by man’s law.’ He emphasizes that his society ‘is exclusively a male society with laws written by men and with prosecutors and judges who judge women’s behavior from the male standpoint’”(Rosefeldt 2). Along with Nora, Eveline also makes an astonishing decision. She comes to the conclusion that Buenos Aires with Frank is an unwise decision to make. As Eveline and Frank are waiting to board the boat to leave, Eveline is in serious prayer because she is unaware of what was about to happen. Suddenly, Eveline is hit with reality and she holds on to a rail. Frank notices this and yells to Eveline to come with him. She refuses. This may upset Eveline but in the end it’s worth it. She can now return home to take care of her family and continue the promise made to her mother. Eveline will no longer have to worry with portraying disloyalty to her family and conscious common sense. The father’s also played important roles in the lives of these young women. Rosefeldt states, “The inherited pollution of the father also inscribes Nora’s behavior. Commenting on Nora’s carelessness about debt, helmer states that she is ‘exactly the way your father was’” (2). Not only does Nora’s father affect her life in such a strong way, but the abuse from Eveline’s father is one the main reasons Eveline contemplates moving at first. Nora is seemingly rich, with attractive clothes, a maid , and a husband that provides for the family and protects them. This may be how it is presented but Nora’s marriage and family are best said to be facades. She doesn’t have much to do with her children because she doesn’t want to pollute their morals, and she dresses to please Helmer who is actually the main source of her pain and anger. Eveline, on the other hand, is living in poverty. Although this is true, she appreciates everything she has and makes the best of it. Her father is abusive, but she never fails to provide for him as though he deserves it. The simple fact that she loves her family so much is the main cause of Eveline’s final decision to stay back home and Ireland. In conclusion, Nora Helmer and Eveline Hill are certainly similar, yet peculiar in their own way. Life surely is a struggle for two ladies, but they each seem to overcome the adversities they are confronted by.
Works Cited
Hart, Clive. “ ‘Eveline’: Overview.” Reference Guid to Short Fiction. Ed. Noelle Watson.
Detroit: St. James Press, 1994. Literature Resource Center. Web 22 Mar. 2011.
.
Trudell, Scott. “Critical Essay on ‘Eveline’”. Short Stories for Students. Ed. Ira Mark
Milne. Vol. 19. Detroit: Gale, 2004. Literature Resource Center. Web. 22 Feb.
2011. .
Rosefeldt, Paul. “Ibsen’s A Doll House. (Henrik Ibsen)(Critical Essay)”. The Explicator 61.2
(2003): 84+. Literature Resource Center. Web. 22 Feb. 2011. .
Shaw, Bernard. “Critical Essay on ‘Eveline’”. Twentieth-Century Literary Criticism. Vol. 8.
Detroit: Gale Research company Book Tower, 1897.
Joyce, James. A Doll’s House.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Third, both Marita and Kewauna paths to success was very far from easy; facing setback after setback. Both grow up in rough places such as Bronx and Chicago, those two places alone are failure just waiting to happen. Also, both struggled to make time for little things such as school work. Having financial problems, Marita’s parents didn’t make enough money so the government had to step in and feed her free meals at school, and on the other hand Kewauna didn’t have money to feed herself. Very obviously that the struggle is real.…
- 200 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
An ideal marriage consists of communication and honesty, but in A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen the Helmer marriage is quite the opposite. At the beginning of the play, Nora conformed to obeying her husband and she was naïve in hoping that her husband would sacrifice his reputation for her. She even forged a check to borrow money from the bank to help Helmer with his illness. She thought that this would be a good way to show her love and ability. Their weak marriage later revealed that Helmer never really understood her and he was ashamed that she had concealed this secret. This event awakened Nora’s true personality and she finally realized that their marriage was fake and weak. In the play A Doll’s House, Henrik Ibsen uses symbolism to portray how Nora is forced by societal norms to mask her true personality through her lies and secrecy, which shows her transition into an independent woman, further emphasising that self knowledge is needed for an authentic life.…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora Helmer is considered a childish young woman in the play. She lets her husband control her; she acts as if she doesn’t have a mind of her own When she around her husband she acts like she is afraid of him. Every time he tells her to do something like a little puppet she does it. She doesn’t have money of her own so she have to ask him for it .He is always being sarcastic towards her. The only reason he treats her like a child is because she lets him. Since he is the man of the house she follows his rules and order like she is one of his children. Nora let her husband tells her what to do, what to eat and what clothes to were. While her husband to busy controlling her, he doesn’t realized that Nora has a little conniving mind of her own.…
- 284 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A Doll’s House has several high points that lead up to what I’ve considered the most defining moment. When Torvald finally reads the letter Krogstad (a fellow schoolmate and an employee at the bank) wrote revealing that it was not from Nora’s father that she borrowed money, but from him, what follows was totally unexpected by me. It seems that the situation of her husband falling ill and the decisions she had to make in regards to that, forced her to grow. In the end, Nora makes a decision that she doesn’t want to be married to her husband Torvald any longer, and she tells him so. The line, “We’ve been married for eight years. Doesn’t it occur to you that this is the first time the two of us, you and I, husband and wife, have had a serious conversation?” (Isben 1879 p. 590) says Nora, licks at where she is going with this conversation between the two of them.…
- 815 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
This only seeks to reduce her place as a human being while further digging her into the belief that her existence is to be Torvalds eye candy and plaything. In the end, the stoic anger that has accumulated from Torvalds constant arrogance and belittlement boils over. Nora…
- 1095 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
A Dollhouse begins with an ordinary couple who seems neither to be extraordinary or plain. They have money, a nice house, and a family. Nora has money spending problems which is probably to overcompensate for her underlying feelings of misery, and Torbert is a loving husband but has no respect for Nora’s opinions and intellect because she is a women. With realism…
- 1555 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
In the play, A Doll House by Henrik Ibsen depicts a foolish, fragile, very self-centered young lady that rarely has to do anything for to help herself. Nora is cared for and lavished by her husband now that he has obtained a new position at the bank. She has no concerns but her appearance in society and the role of woman in a man's eye. Nora's husband believed that borrowing was not an option because it would lead to debts. Therefore, he was the one in control of money; this included making money and spending it. However, when Nora's husband turned ill, she realized that she had to develop her own individuality. Nora could no longer pretend to be someone that others would like her to be rather than being her true self.…
- 2027 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen, portrays a young married woman, Nora, who plays a dramatic role of deception and self-indulgence. The author creates a good understanding of a woman’s role by assuming Nora is an average housewife who does not work; her only job is to maintain the house and raise the children like a stereotypical woman that cannot work or help society. In reality, she is not an average housewife in that she has a hired maid who deals with the house and children. Although Ibsen focuses on these “housewife” attributes, Nora’s character is ambitious, naive, and somewhat cunning. She hides a dark secret from her husband that not only includes borrowing money, but also forgery. Nora’s choices were irrational; she handled the situations very poorly in this play by keeping everything a secret. The way that women were viewed in this time period created a barrier that she could not overcome. The decisions that had the potential to be good were otherwise molded into appalling ones. Women should have just as many rights as men and should not be discriminated by gender; but they should also accept consequences in the same way without a lesser or harsher punishment.…
- 3445 Words
- 14 Pages
Good Essays -
In A Dolls’ House the stories’ two main protagonists Nora and Torvald Helmer which is a married couple experiences many things while being married. And in most cases money brought forth the bulk of their problems, which eventually caused the relationship to split apart. However many people looked at the couples’ relationship from the exterior and thought it was legit. Another character in the play, Nora’s close friend Ms. Linde views the Helmers as a married couple who lives comfortable enough to afford things that she usually cannot. Even though the Helmers’ household is taken care of financially, it is in disarray due to lies, and deceit. On the outside it looks fine as Nora could be compared to a doll; looking nice and well kept together. In reality Nora has hid from her husband that she have been repaying a debt for years from when her and her husband took a trip to Italy. The reader also learns that Nora secretly forged the signature of her deceased father. Out of all the things that happened within the story Torvald eventually finds out about what’s been going on and is outraged. He calls Nora a hypocrite and a liar and complains that she has ruined his happiness. He declares that she will not be allowed to raise their children. And as a result the married couple are separated. The symbol “doll house” really help functions in the work of revealing the characters because it shows Nora as a doll who you would think is squeaky clean and flawless, but deep down inside is…
- 368 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
You must submit to your husband, you must let him talk first and wait to put your input in until he has gotten settled in the house, and you must be ready for whatever his needs are; the roles of women in the 1800’s. In the play A Doll’s House author Henrik Ibsen wrote about a married couple named Nora and Torvald their relationship from the start had readers very uncomfortable and feeling emotions towards their dynamics. Nora shows that she has a secret side by going behind Torvalds back and getting a loan, in doing so forging her dad's signature which in turn puts them secretly in debt that only Nora knows about. Through the play one goes through a whirlwind of how this secret plays out in the lives of other characters and how Torvald finding out about this lie shows his other side. Nora is very submissive to Torvald and Torvald loves his doll Nora.…
- 1102 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen was first performed in 1879 when European society strictly enforced male supremacy over women. The play consists of a middle class couple, Torvald and Nora Helmer, who seem to have the perfect marriage, three children, and a pending respectable income with the husband’s recent promotion to bank manager. Torvald treats Nora like a doll, manicuring and manipulating her looks and actions. Although his controlling demeanor is concealed by innocent nicknames and monetary allowances, the affects of his domination over his wife are eventually exposed. At the end of the play, Nora leaves in a haze of anguish after her husband fails to defend her when she is accused of legal fraud in a loan she had taken to save Torvald’s life. Some people say that Nora was right to leave and flee the control of her demeaning husband to seek her individuality, but many argue the contrary when considering what she left behind, what she could have demanded and changed at home, and what she would face as an independent woman defending herself in a 19th century, male biased society. Although some may assertively argue that Nora was right to leave her home, others suggest the she was not right to leave considering the abandonment of her children, the responsibility she could have demanded from her husband, and the prejudice against independent women in her society.…
- 1908 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
In A Doll House, written by Henrik Ibsen, Nora Helmer spends the entire play trying to keep a big secret from her husband, Torvald Helmer. This secret is that she borrowed money to pay for Torvald to get better, but she told her husband that she got the money from her father. After consulting her friend Kristine and lawyer Krogstad, Nora allowed Torvald to find out the truth, which leads to her leaving him and their children. Throughout the play, it is obvious that Nora has different characteristics, some of which are good and bad. In A Doll House, Nora shows the characteristics of being loving, deceitful, and selfish.…
- 838 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Nora is the main leading character of “A Doll House”. She seems to be a happy woman at the start of the play as she shows her affection towards Torvald. Like every woman she shows her excitement about the extra money of Torvald’s new job. She also enjoys the company of her children and friends. She does not seem to be unhappy with her life and relations.…
- 789 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
He makes her feel like a child by making her ask him for money and passing judgment when she asks for so much even though he does not know why. Nora lived a privileged life where she did not have any major struggles like Mrs. Linde did. This play is most likely called a Doll House because Nora felt like a doll in her home and in society that everyone else controlled what she did and said. After a while that takes a toll on a person and they feel like everything is crashing down. Thus, in the end Nora left to find herself, which was completely understandable yet at the same time not. She chose to leave a comfortable lifestyle with two wonderful children and a husband who took care of…
- 714 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The comparison in A Doll’s House is similar to Shakespeare’s Othello. In A Doll’s House Nora was also being dishonest, not trust worthy and was deceiving her husband as it pertains to their finances. Nora had forged her father’s signature to secure a loan to save her family and sick husband financially. Nora’s…
- 1570 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays