Justin Yates
ENG 1213
April 15, 2013
One man breaks free of the binding chains of society while the rest of the population draws contentment from the many adventures of select shadow puppets. Government in general is a powerful entity that relentlessly grasps the masses and subjects them to their every whim. Society is often unaware of these chains and is blindly forced into this manner of living. Henry David Thoreau’s “A Civil Disobedience” illustrates how most men have rendered their conscious useless by continuing to adhere to every aspect of their ruling entity. Paralleling Thoreau’s idea of a binding government we have Plato’s “An Allegory of the Cave” describing how men simply accept one reality, illustrated by their governors, and never seek out any other meaning. Henry David Thoreau and Plato fundamentally agree that people must live according to the scrutiny of their conscious. In order to live in this manner people must be willing to break their chains and disobey authority when they realize that it is wrong. There are three specific aspects these two individual’s focus on in their literary works: the problems with the level of control the government has of the governed, the necessity to break free of such control, and how only the individual has the power to break away. Throughout history the government has been the Supreme Being regarding the control of the people. They implement laws, control the media and determine where and how their people will live. Henry David Thoreau recognizes that the government has an overly substantial amount of control over the population and maintains that such control should be undesirable. He brings light to the fact that very few people are resisting such control and that “a minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority” (Thoreau 1056). Plato illustrates this control in “An Allegory of the Cave” by using his innate ability to construct vivid imagery. Representing the government, the puppet masters play countless stories along the cave wall and “the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows of the images,” but the viewers would fully believe that these images were the truth (Plato 1235). This not only represents the ability of the government to distort the truth through mass media control, but more importantly the ability to control the masses in general. In light of these circumstances, Plato believes that the people would be better off without the puppet masters while Thoreau maintains the same idea regarding the machine. Understanding the control in which the government has over the people brings both authors to the conclusion that the people must break free of these chains. Thoreau often provokes action in “A Civil Disobedience” believing that “unjust laws exist” and asks of the public, “shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once” (Thoreau 1055)? He urges the men to break free of the chains placed upon them and to take part in any form of a “peaceable revolution” (1056). Plato conveys a similar yearning for the men to break free by revealing his desire for them to see the true reality. He believes that once they have been exposed to the vivid reality that they “would rather suffer anything than entertain these false notions and live in this miserable manner” (Plato 1237). In conclusion, both Thoreau and Plato believe that men need to know the truth and experience reality. It is desirable to leave the dreary caves of lost consciousness and to attain a new life in the realms of reality. This can easily be done, however the ability to accomplish such a thing solely lies within each individual. They must dedicate themselves to the cause and realize that “action from principle, the perception and the performance of right, changes things and relations” and that their acts must be “essentially revolutionary” (Thoreau 1055). Plato compliments this sentiment in his belief “that the power and capacity of learning exists in the soul already” (Plato 1239). This particular statement is interpreted to mean that only a sole individual has the “power and capacity” to change their reality (1239). Thoreau and Plato share the same philosophy all people possess the ability to change the circumstances in their life. Everyone deserves to progress through life by use of their conscious and ability to manipulate their own perception. It is the lone individual whom possesses the ability to change the countless details that govern their life. In light of the previously stated facts, it can be determined that no set government can force anyone to fully live in the way that such a government wishes. Thoreau and Plato believe that all individuals should be able to think freely and live life the way they think is right, without the blinding veil of a higher power to distort their perception. So, both parties urge the people to push past the veils and destroy the chains that bind them. They urge the people to live well by blossoming in a reality of their making and to gladly embrace the freedom which was innately theirs to begin with.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Thoreau clarifies the government is corrupt and unreliable for the people. He uses similes to represent the corruption, and how easy it is for people to take advantage of the government for their own benefit. Thoreau states, "...the work of comparatively a few individuals use the standing government as their tool." Therefore, he is trying to represent the government by a tool that is useful and easy to attain by people. When the government is so easily taken advantage of by few people, it has…
- 237 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
“Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau warns its readers that we are at the mercy of our government and have no power as a minority that conforms to the majority, which represses our desire to resist the wrongs we believe in without the support of the masses. The place for an honorable, just man is within prison, which he explains through his personal experience. In part 1, Thoreau exposes how the government is without a conscience, susceptible to corruption for their own advantage, and are served not by men but by “machines” (5). We are left “to the mercy of chance” under the power of the majority. Part 2 explains that Thoreau didn’t believe in the voting system so would not pay poll tax, and was sent to jail only to find that he felt more…
- 204 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Thoreau begins his essay by arguing that the government intervenes too much and it would be better if they were not involved at all. He believes men are too absent minded and do whatever the government says without thinking about their morals. Those who listen and follow the government are not wise and do not trust their conscience.…
- 351 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
"He keeps casting conformity behind him". Henry David Thoreau was never one to conform to society's norms. It is very apparent that this entire play's main idea is nonconformity. That is the way Thoreau lived his life. Many transcendentalists speak of what they wish to live their life as, however, it was Thoreau who went further than just discussing Transcendentalism; he put it into practice when he refused to pay the poll tax that supported the war efforts. He lived in the way he viewed as correct, rather than the way society told him to live. For example, when he completely leaves society behind and goes into the woods to thrive on his own and when he went against the teaching methods of the time period and of religious views. He never wanted to be like anybody else, and this play reflects both his personality and beliefs. If he was told to do something that he seemed unfit or contradicting everything he believed in, then he just wouldn't do it.…
- 323 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
with an illuminating promise (Thoreau, “Economy,” 4) . The promise to have property (terra nullius), and in that property, is the tabula rasa of man’s new beginnings. Yet that liberty came at the further expense of aboriginal, black, and enviromental freedom. The flame from liberty’s chalice casts its lawful protection of those considered citizens, and in that, disavows certain men from that sense of having security: “[a] slave and prisoner of his own [private] opinion of himself” (4). The material consciousnesses of men sublates and alienates man from his/her self-development. The alienating practices of patriotism as a form of hegemonic social control estranged man from his neighbours. S/he must balance between the necessity of “commerce…
- 1240 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
In the book, Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr., the main character, Harrison is forced to submit to a controlling governmental system or fight for his beliefs. Harrison believes that he should be free to be his own person, rather than be controlled by an over powerful government. His parents, on the other hand, thinks that a controlling government is the right way to live. They believe if the government does not have control, then the society would go back to the dark ages which is a time where everyone was competing for everything and there was no social control. In Harrison Bergeron, the government controls every aspect of people’s lives. Harrison and the people can’t be who they want to be in life because of the government. The structure of this government resembles more of a dystopian society rather than a utopian society.…
- 530 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In his opening paragraph, he declares the bold and audacious statements: ‘[...] government is best which governs least [...]’ (lines 1-2) followed by, ‘[...] government is best which governs not at all [...]’ (line 4). Immediately the audience is—very clearly—exposed to his argument, which has an immense amount of force behind it. This is vital for Thoreau’s argument, as throughout his essay the audience hears a very strong and passionate voice, urging them to feel the same way about the topic, and that they too have been wronged by the government. Alongside Thoreau’s very forceful and powerful tone, a candid and critical tone is present. ‘This American government—what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity?’ (lines 18-20). This very prominent line denounces the American government’s rectitude, implying that its partiality has reached to the point where it is just a pattern, and continued to increasingly execute unequitable behaviour. Though his attitude sounds negative and pessimistic, Thoreau does make a petition for action from society with an encouraging tone. ‘[...] I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect, and that will be one step toward obtaining it...’ (lines 45-48). Here, Thoreau uses ethos, as he knows that every man (and woman) wants to be respected, which then builds motivation for the people to take action against the current unjust government instead of heeding to its indoctrinated…
- 1130 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
To be in full control of a man, dictators must not only enslave his body, but also destroy his mind. A man’s mind and the knowledge that a man has is his most powerful weapon. By depleting the mind of knowledge, a man cannot be in control of his own self and therefore is more easily conquered. In Anthem by Ayn Rand, the leaders and society in her book seek to accomplish control by choosing the jobs for the people, keeping the word “I” unknown, and maintaining a sense of unity from birth.…
- 608 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As we are watching the makings of this election season unfold in front of us, many of us are quick to defend or challenge any presidential candidate. It is during this crucial time that, not only do we get to see the politics that people hold dear, but also the the embodiment of the leader they want. Some people would say that they would rather have no leader instead of one of these candidates. However, leaders are a necessity, for any group, organization, or established, set society and community. In Common Sense, Thomas Paine states that “Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil”. He elaborates, saying that when we encounter miseries from a government, that we would normally encounter with the lack of one, “we furnish…
- 1145 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
It is very difficult to be able to advance in life if you are not allowed to think freely and become an individual. In the book Anthem, the author, Ayn Rand depicts her concept of mankind through a society where individualism is immoral. The main character, Equality 7-2521, struggles to remain a collectivist, he begins to question his society and defy their beliefs and rules. Equality 7-2521, successfully broke free from confinement when he came to the realization that "To be free, a man must be free of his brothers” (Pg 101). So, in order to become free and to be able to prosper in life you must work for yourself, toward individualism, not for the collective.…
- 1092 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In contrast to our present day society in which we are moving towards collectivism, Ayn Rand’s Anthem depicts a collectivist society which is disrupted by Prometheus, the protagonist, ensuing in the creation of a newfound individualistic society separate from the original civilization. “The will of the Council is above all things” (34) in Prometheus’ society; they dominate the people’s occupation, living situation, and the knowledge they have access to.…
- 448 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In Thoreau’s essay, “Resistance to Civil Government,” he responds to the Mexican-American War and slavery. Believing that the government is futile, he argues that those working for the government are machines following…
- 422 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Plato, in "The Republic," describes humanity's inability to escape the pit of darkness known as ignorance due to a limited perspective. Unfortunately, society is not fully aware of the limited perspective, because people choose the easier path; as a result, even when civilization is pointed towards two different paths- one towards knowledge and enlightenment and one towards a much easier decision- it chooses to remain in the darkness. The prisoners would rather allow their imaginations to cloud their judgment, causing a shadowy representation of reality, instead of thinking about new solutions; the ideal behind Plato's allegory is that society is unwilling to follow an opportunity as a result of the obstacles that surround the opportunity.…
- 346 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“When there is no more room in hell, the dead will walk the Earth (Romero, 1978). From shuffling corpses to gallons of fake blood, the 1978 "Dawn of the Dead" and its 2004 counterpart, demonstrate the vast difference in horror films of today and those of the 1970 's. While the original was a catalyst for a paradigm shift in the world of horror cinema, the 2004 remake is a bold reminder of how far the genre has come. While sharing a title and an overall basic plotline, the similarities stop there. Separated by more than two decades, these two films are a prime example of the speed at which technology and society are advancing.…
- 1136 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The relationship between individuals and society has been a topic of debates for generations. In these debates, individuality has been given various definitions which can be grossly summarised as “The aggregate of qualities and characteristics that distinguish one person or thing from others” (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/individuality). It has been also argued that “The irony of individuality is that sometimes it is a luxury that can only be achieved by contributing something special to the group. True individualists are often innovators.” (http://www.helium.com/items/1273481-thoughts-on-individuality). Interestingly, individuals may innovate by rebelling against societies, to the extent that the latter are a reflection of the ideology of the ruling parties. It follows that the act of standing up against the beliefs of a society or government is in itself a characteristic of individuality, one, however, that may prove very dangerous. This idea is encapsulated in Voltaire’s saying that “It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong”. Although some people believe that one should remain passive, as, according to Voltaire, it is dangerous to turn against a corrupt regime, Orwell’s “1984” and Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451” demonstrate that citizens should take action against oppression and violation of human rights.…
- 1070 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays