One of, if not the biggest, story of the year has been about former NSA employee Edward Snowden and his action of leaking classified information to the public about the NSA recoding and spying on U.S. Citizens. There are many arguments and opinions on both sides of the table. Some view Snowden as a hero, while others view him as a traitor, but one topic that has continued to be brought up in relation to the realization that the NSA has been spying on its own citizens has been whether or not the U.S. Government should become transparent. A transparent government, also known as an open government, is defined as “doctrine that all government business should be open to regulation and scrutiny by the public”. The though of being aware of all actions that the government makes sounds comforting at first, there are many disadvantages, ranging from economic to national security. One of the first and most obvious reasons against an open government it the security risks it would involve. When you have an open government, you allow for everyone to see how the inner working of important government agencies, from the Department of Defense and the Center for Disease Control, to the Food and Drug Administration. Even if you kept military secrets, such as tactics and nuclear storage sites, classified in an open government, you would still have to have the workings of budgetary goals exposed, which may not seem much, but you would be able to tell how much money was going to who, and notice and shifts in how much money is being funneled into a certain subset of government. Budget information alone would give a major clue into the weaker points of the department of defense. Even more, reports for any type of raid by any sort of law enforcement, federal or state, would be a matter of public record, which would give criminals and criminal organizations such as gangs and drug cartels insight not only into what kind of raid have been going on, but how those raids are conductive. There are also others who believe an open government would be the end all solution to political corruption in a government due to the fact that a government or persons of the government would be unable to hid where all the money comes from, and where all the money goes. There seems to be a naïve line of thought that people believe that all of our countries and unpopular decision come down to who simply has the most money. While money certainly has an impact, the fact is that people like to turn the sentiment into a scapegoat, bringing it out anytime a situation occurs that they are not in any sort of control over ends up with an outcome different than they desired. On the same lines of believing that all corruption would stop is the fact that the people of the U.S. Would control and influence the government out of fear than rational though. In the face of disaster, overreaction would be the norm, with the people wanting to react in a way that satisfies a impulse but may not be the best thing for the future. Take hurricane Katrina for example. In the aftermath of the tragedy, it would become apparent that there was not enough preparation or funding to FEMA. Information like this could very likely lead to anger and riots in the face of the death of millions, but when a country is in the middle of a tragedy, it is not the time to sit around and point fingers, its a time for action and to help stabilize the region. A careful investigation would have revealed the faults in the levees and the poor allocation of funds to FEMA, this would all happen in the aftermath, not during In conclusion, a transparent government is not the solution to the problems we face today. It would certainly make everyone feel better, for a while. It would be a permanent solution to a temporary problem that would certainly lead to much worse circumstances in the future.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
To ensure expressive, associational, and privacy rights are strengthened instead of being compromised by new technology is the goal of the Protecting Civil Liberties and protect the core democratic rights when corporate and government practices that rely on new technology that invades these rights. The government regularly tracks all calls of nearly every common American and spy on a large number of Americans’ international calls, text messages, and emails. Whistle blower Eric Snowden, a contractor with NSA, willfully and knowingly exposed the government’s most sensitive surveillance techniques without authorization and the most fundamental rights as individuals. The ACLU has been fighting for over 12 years to end government surveillance’s lack of oversight that allows it to invade the rights and lives of millions of Americans. When the case against mass surveillance reached the Supreme Court several years ago, was dismissed due to lack of sufficient evidence of the secret programs. Leading the way, the ACLU’s struggle to rein in the surveillance superstructure which strikes at the core of our privacy rights, freedom of speech and association will continue. ("ACLU: National…
- 1583 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
I. Introduction: Since the acknowledgment of abused power by the NSA by former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden, long debate about the constitutionality of the collection of private records of American citizens has ensued in the senate. As a result of this issue that has and can continue to transgress on the civil liberty of privacy by all persons and entities, The USA Freedom act has been created which seeks to limit and to regulate the power of US surveillance agencies to collect private information from third parties. The USA Freedom directly addresses issues that are included in the USA Patriot Act, an act that was created to combat and to create protection against the threat of terrorism, which was a fear that heightened in response to the 2001 September 11 attacks (Savage). While this bill proved necessary at the time, in the act, are provisions that overstep constitutional boundaries that go beyond the intention and framework of the original plan.…
- 3654 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The book by George Orwell brought to life this point and is relatable to high schools students due to this reading the curriculum. The book demonstrated what a totalitarian government would look like and what it would look like for the government to have the power of monitoring citizens and a day to day basis. As independent college students, freedom is desired and shuns in a way unnecessary restrictions and regulations. Having terrorism haunt our nation though, it subjects citizen’s caution and want to have more security, but it can be done in other fashions besides wiretapping. Presented examples of privacy issues that everyone deals with that could influence someone to not agree with the government having access to…
- 572 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Our phone calls, computer's browsing histories, social security, and zip code numbers are accessible by the government. Cameras record us on the daily, spying on our routines. Always being monitored…
- 774 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When George Orwell 's epic novel 1984 was published in 1949 it opened the public 's imagination to a future world, where privacy and freedom had no meaning. The year 1984 has come and gone and recent advances in technology have emerged. These new developments have empowered the government, and help to highlight the similarities between the American government and the government in 1984. Although many cannot even begin to accept the disturbing similarities shared between America 's government today and that of George Orwell 's 1984, they do exist. Today 's American government mirrors the government in 1984, because in both societies the government violates one 's basic right to privacy, and misleads their citizens into supporting their war efforts.…
- 810 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
America’s government can be defined as a federal republic. Federal meaning that individual states have a certain degree of power, but centrally there is a national government that has authority over them. In a republic, the people have the power to elect leaders who will govern according to the set of laws in the U.S Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Even though we have a set of codes and guidelines to help us run the government, with the recent government shut down it is obvious that the national government is doing something wrong.…
- 1557 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The thoughts of those looking into the affairs of the NSA think the government took a great idea, and honestly the only idea with today’s technological warfare, and got greedy with how much information they have collected and need to be watched very carefully. The most important information for any human being is the information we choose to keep private, it can be the most devastating information in the wrong hands and the United States Government is holding that exact information in bulk, with your name on a yellow folder.…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A country should always have the ability to lead public opinion and preserve social stability. In today’s world, the United States government still holds certain level of control over media and flow of information- in a more insidious way. Similar to those who doubted “safe for democracy” during World War I, Edward Snowden “has revealed a broken system of our Constitution, and he’s given us the opportunity to get it back, to retrieve our civil liberties, but more than that, to retrieve the separation of powers here on which our democracy depends.” (6)…
- 420 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
America should be aware of how much power the NSA holds. Many citizens use their cellular devices and the internet daily. If Edward Snowden did not release the information he knew, America would currently be a one-way mirror; the government could be watching us without us being aware of the situation. According to Geoffrey R. Stone, "Edward Snowden: "Hero or Traitor"?", explains how Edward Snowden had no authority…
- 845 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Edward Snowden was a hot topic in the news in 2013 after he released classified information from the National Security Agency (NSA) to the media. This leak contained information about global surveillance performed by the United States, which involved monitoring email, tracking cell phones, and logging phone calls. Not only did this action force him into asylum overseas to avoid arrest, but it ultimately caused an uproar in the media and amongst the American public. The controversy surrounding Snowden involves the rights of the public vs. the surveillance programs performed by the U.S. While many condemn Snowden for betraying the national security of his country, many applaud him for exposing the…
- 1168 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Privacy is Utterly Dead Peter Singer is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor at Princeton University and the University of Melbourne that studies Bioethics, Philosophy and Public Ethics. His essay “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” focuses on transparency and personal privacy. One can see after reading this essay, Singer is in favor of openness, but he also notes that the government misuses these technologies by having sousveillance and surveillance cameras. A person needs to understand how privacy, surveillance and sousveillance is defined to understand why he was in favor of openness.…
- 1306 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
All the countries establish in its political constitution and in its legislation, the duty of the government to look over the life of its citizens, protecting them from the risk: the internal threats (inside the proper country) and external (outside the country) That is why, it is admitted, and it is even required, that the government possess a structure of intelligence that resists the action of dangerous forces, however lately, it has been found that in order to get information that may be useful to protect citizens , the government itself reach private information from all its citizens as well. That is why this essay aims to point out the risks this action (spying) implies for all and aims to answer thereupon,” Why government should not spy on us.”…
- 806 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Today! ” the collection of Communication Information Data, Conducting and Investigation of Foreign Intelligence, Controlling of Money Laundering, Funding and Enhancing of National Border Security” (Doyle, 2002) have greatly concerned some groups like the American Civil Liberties, Citizens, and even the Private Sectors, because it might be intruding, and violation of the “American Peoples” constitutional rights. But even with these concerns and controversial issues, some say the country have been safe so far, because of the incertion of authority by the Patriot Act removing walls erected by President Clinton and allowing it to share information by the Homeland Security and Government Agencies and etc.…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Information or technological devices which fall into the wrong hands should be prevented at all cost. The government should begin screening their employees a bit better and accountability should be more visible. If the public is aware of officers who are punished for illegal wiretapping, using satellite surveillance for personal gain, or tampering with evidence stored on computers they would feel more confident that their rights are being safeguarded. The public must know the government will not allow agents to violate privacy without very good reasons and if caught they are…
- 1795 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
"Secrecy and a free, democratic government don't mix," President Harry Truman once said. Harry Truman understood the importance of an open government in a free society. Unfortunately, George W. Bush has a different outlook. From the first days of his administration, President Bush has taken steps to tighten the government's hold on information and limit public scrutiny of its activities. Expansive assertions of executive privilege, restrictive views of the Freedom of Information Act, increasing use of national security classification, stonewalling in response to congressional request for information all these were evident even before the September 11 attacks (At Issue: Has the Bush administration misused government secrecy?). Since then the clamps on information have only tightened. The purpose of this paper is to examine some methods used by the government and to provide some explanations why the government is keeping the American public uninformed.…
- 1363 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays