Preview

The Division Of Labor In The United States

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
764 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Division Of Labor In The United States
Dictionary.com defines the division of labor as, a production process in which a worker or group of workers is assigned a specialized task in order to increase efficiency. Using information researched in textbooks and online resources, this essay will explain the importance of the division of labor and the importance it has to a capitalist economy like that of the United States. Another speculation that will be covered is how the division of labor can lead to more efficient production.

Division of Labor
Division of labor is basically when a whole process of mass production is broken up into smaller more manageable fragments. These fragments are then assigned to a person or group of people to complete their portion of the whole production
…show more content…
This is because when a task is broken down into many segments, more detail can be paid to that specific segmented task. Alongside of better attention to detail, the task can be done quicker and in a larger quantity. Therefore better quality, bulk production, and less man-hours during production equating to less a worker has to be compensated. A more in-depth observation is to look at the cost to train one person to do five tasks in comparison to the cost to train five people to do one specific task (Smith, 1904). An employer would spend more time and money to train that one person then having to compensate that person for the accrued knowledge and extra work. However, the company could spend less time and money training five workers to do the same task at a higher rate of production due to the segmented production. Although the person trained to do many has the knowledge to compete, one could not compete with five people trained individually to complete each task separately. The time it takes for that one to complete the production cycle, four or more items can be produced at a fraction of the cost. In some cases, it may be more beneficial to have a highly and multi skilled worker than having many specifically and singularly skilled …show more content…
An example of specialization is plant workers such as General Motors. The workers there have specific jobs on an assembly line in which they perform these repetitive production tasks to guarantee quality and speedy production of a vehicle. An example of division of labor would be that of a dairy farmer that specifically yields milk as a product. Although the farmer could produce and sell milk cheese and butter, the specialization of producing milk is more beneficial to that farmers talents. Foregoing the opportunity cost of producing many milk products to only producing milk. In which the milk could be sold to companies that produce the latter while earning the farmer a double profit for both the milk as an end product and the milk as a ingredient to be further

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    ECO 106 LO2 Homework

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. What are the advantages of using capital in the production process? What is meant by the term “division of labor”? What are the advantages of specialization in the use of human and material…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. According to Durkheim, what are the primary causes of the division of labor in general?…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another one of Smith’s ideas was the “division of labor”. Smith was saying to divide labor amongst the workers, instead of have each laborer working individually. The example Smith used was a pin factory. He said that there would be more output of pins if every worker was delegated a specific part, instead of having individual workers work on one pin alone. It is like an assembly line. And of course, with a division of labor there will be differences…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx, Weber and Durkheim would undoubtedly have three very different views on this division of labour based on their reflection of society. For instance, Marx would see this division as a societal conflict, the core personnel are the oppressor, they usually belong to higher classes, they hold a position of power and make more profit from the product than the support personnel. The latter, in fact, tends to come from the lower classes, they are the oppressed, although greater in number, their labour is exploited, they can be easily replaced and are paid much less. This division is the natural result of capitalism, Marx would claim that the only solution to this inequality is the revolution.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    adam smith vs karl marx

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “THE GREATEST IMPROVEMENTS in the productive powers of labour, and the greater part of the skill, dexterity, and judgment, with which it is anywhere directed, or applied, seem to have been the effects of the division of labour”(Smith,10).Smith rapidly makes this concrete by giving the example of a pin factory where of course pins are being produced. He stresses just how much this work is divided up into different branches and operations and that no one person can come close of doing all that work themselves. It’s not just a matter of the one person not having enough time to do all those task but there are more fundamental factors operating. As professor Goshulak mentioned in lecture five, Adam Smith gives three main reasons why the division of Labour leads to greater productivity. The first is simply the increase in dexterity or learning in performing a particular operation (Goshulak). The second is the saving of time in passing one task to another, a worker who is specializing can concentrate on one task without having to deal with those switching cost. Finally the most dynamic effect perhaps even the most important is that the focused worker is more likely to invent and innovate and come up with new and better ways of performing the task.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quoting Michael Yates, “The subject matter of economics is the production and distribution of output…” (Yates, 2003). So what does this say to me? Simplifying, this says to me that Economics is a way of explaining the world. With studies dating as far back as Aristotle’s interest in the various forms of state, how can one ever fully understand the complexities of economic thought and how could one definition ever sum up the entirety of what economists endeavour to understand? (Meikle, Scott, 1995) The study of economics attempts to understand and to explain how and why the wealth of the world is produced, distributed, and consumed. It examines everything from global and local markets, class structures and wealth distribution, the role of government and politicians, supply and demand of products and services, the division of labour, and countless other factors that affect how and why the productions systems of the world economy function the way they do. Arguably, one of the most influential factors in defining the subject matter of economics is the division of labour. By influential I am not stating that I am of the opinion that the current distribution of labour it is positive factor to our current economic climate, just that it is an influential one. Although the famous theorist Adam Smith argued that economic growth, as a result of the productivity improvements gained, was rooted in the division of labour (Smith, 1776). He, among others, also came to acknowledge the many downsides of a deepening division of labour (Walker, 1886 Smith, 1776 Marx, 1847). Labour is distributed not only between countries and companies but also within each individual company. The wage disparity between middle and lower class and the wealth distribution between labourers and capitalists (business owners) that results from a deepening division of labour…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Due to the rapid developments of markets there was a significant improvement in productivity of businesses and as a result businesses began to analyse their production methods and altered these with the introduction of technology. The biggest change was the division of labour amongst the workforce, this is where production was broken down into a number of stages with workers only being responsible for a set task in their given production stage. Over time this also meant that those workers would specialise in their given task, becoming more skilled in their role and as a result increasing efficiency. (Wetherley, P…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Js Mills Conformity

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The wealth of a nation stems from its labor force (ability, quality, number), which is important because the more production there is; the more there is to trade. Smith shows his opposition to mercantilism that was existent when he was writing this text; however, he gives an account of a social dynamic that is deeply embedded in human nature. He develops the idea of the division of labor and how this particular partition can lead to the prosperity of a state by producing a surplus of goods and services that can later be exchanged in the economic market. It is also important because it brings to light the significance of individualism versus membership in a community; division of labor shows that it is most ethical for economic thought to focus on individual well-being. The division of labor in industries has lead to increased worker skill (dexterity), increased efficiency, and improved machinery.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Industrial Revolution, overshadowed the perception of craft as valuable with its machines and mass production. The advent of machines and capitalism drove out the need for the human hand in the manufacturing industry but technically skilled persons were still necessary to run the machines. The concept of division of labour was introduced as an innovative and efficient solution to manage multiple tasks simultaneously and as a way to increase productivity. Instead of depending on a small number of skilled craftsman to oversee the work from conception to completion, it was easier to divide the process of product making into different stages and training different individuals to perform specific tasks as required in the various stages of production.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the low-wage jobs are not required a high education background, in the real situation is you have to work more in order to make enough money to survive. We all want to have a “good job” that can pay you well and also enjoyable at work, but what job is the best option you want to have? In the book “Nickel and Dimed”, the writer Barbara Ehrenreich argued that a minimum-wage worker trying to survive with minimum wage jobs, but the paycheck is not enough for them to balance the expense in the U.S. But with a degree you can to find a job with better financial stability and working more meaningful and sustainable. You definitely need money, there’s no question about it. But if you have to spend 40 – 60 hours every weeks on your job, why not have a degree then get a better job?…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wealth of Nations

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages

    First, the division of labor creates specialized knowledge of a particular trade or task. It reduces every man's business to some one simple operation, and making this operation as the sole employment of a workman’s life. This, in turn, makes the laborers engaged in this task more dexterous, and therefore more productive.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Marx believes that division of labor is a natural process, one that arises near spontaneously. Marx believes that as a nation develops its labor inevitably also becomes more divided. “How far the productive forces of a nation are developed is shown most manifestly by the degree to which division of labor has been carried. Each new productive force…causes a further development of the division of labor” (Tucker, 150). This division is what he finds to be problematic because it separates man from doing what he truly desires to do. In a highly specialized society, every individual must contribute to a facet of the society’s collective production; however, this input may be very minimal (depending on the degree of specialization). To whit, “As soon as the distribution of labor comes into being, each man has a particular, exclusive sphere of activity” (160). Every man has his place and he is forced into it by the demands of society. However,…

    • 2363 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the writers believe that the division of labor is essentially the most important element to capitalism. However, if one delves into how both writers discuss this idea, one notices that they do in fact differ. Smith believes that the division of labor is a system that creates specializations as the division of labor produces productive efficiency ( Smith 7) in addition to promoting efficiency by: increasing skill, saving time and encouraging the development of new technology (Smith 11-13). Overall the argument put forward by Smith creates a utopian economic atmosphere.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -Division of labour is not a practice which is invented intentionally by human wisdom; it is rather a result of the inclination of human nature to exchange one thing for another.(17)…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Social Order?

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The division of labor is what creates the roles and hierarchy that exist in society. The group of capitalists were able to utilize the poor working class to their advantage, and Marx encouraged “to overthrow the existing order and substitute collective control of society by the people,” in order for the weaker majority to be free. (Turner, Pg. 73) Marx continues on with conflict by pointing out that “the members of different classes are enemies because they have opposing interests.” (Turner, Pg. 79)…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays