Preview

The Effect of Boer War on the British Control: African Empire

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1816 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Effect of Boer War on the British Control: African Empire
How far did the Boer War affect the British control of its African Empire?
The Boer War was fought between the British and white Dutch settlers in South Africa 1899-1902. It had many effects, and led to the growth of anti-imperialism within British politics and society, and highlighted the incompetence of the British military. It also resulted in the formation of the union of South Africa and to the formation of a Dominion in South Africa. The whole idea of imperialism had changed – the meaning of it went from being positive to negative. The war would turn attention away from social reform. As Lloyd George put it “Every shell fired amounted to the cost of a pension for an old person in Britain.”1 It re-focused priorities upon domestic issues. However Lloyd George could have been exaggerating the cost of the war as he was not in the government at the time but wanted to win votes. Zara Steiner said that the war was a catalyst in changing the way Britain looked at itself. For example, it led to reforms and the strengthening of the British navy, which would help Britain maintain its colonies in Africa. This fits alongside the increased popularity of Eugenics, which was belief that the human race needed to be protected from the “unfit” “degenerates”, and which while vile in tone did ultimately lead to the recruitment of healthier soldiers. Therefore there was still continuity. Andrew Marr said that the “British Empire still stood tall but was wobbling on a feet of clay”2 which implies that Britain still maintained its African empire but was weakened as a result of the Boer war. C.C Eldridge goes further. He says that the British Empire not only survived all the traumas produced by the Boer war but expanded as a result of its victory and became even more important for British trade and investment than it had ever been before. Between 1903 and 1914 British exports to the empire in Africa increased by 31 per cent.
It was a very costly war for Britain. They won through

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Source A is an extract from a book by Andrew Roberts, published in 1999. Its purpose is to inform people, but with the intention of selling copies. The source suggests the support for the Boer war was political; however it did not have the public’s backing. This caused national tension and the government’s decision to continue the war was deemed as a mishandling of the situation. “Church bells were rung, flags were flown, and school children were given a half day off school, stock exchange was suspended.” This shows the lack of support for the war as the public were elated to hear the news that soldiers were returning from home. Evidently, they supported Britain as a country to do well, but did not support the government’s ideas to resume the war. The reliability of the source however could be questioned, as the intention of the book is to sell copies, therefore it must be intriguing. As a result, the book may not be 100% factual in order to bring about some excitement in the book and so cannot be considered completely reliable.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1899, Britain became involved in a war, known as the Boer War, in South Africa, which was part of the British Empire at that time. As a result of Britain having a relatively small army, volunteer recruits were needed to increase the army size. However, the British Government became alarmed when almost 25% of the volunteers were rejected because there were physically unfit to serve in the armed forces. This figure was even higher among volunteers from the industrial cities. Politicians and the public…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, others have argued that rather than showing a positive reaction to progressive Liberalism, the result reflected an overwhelming rejection of Conservative policies. The main and perhaps one of the most damaging issue for the Conservatives was the Boer War; though it had originally benefited the Conservatives in 1900, promoting patriotism and helping them win the 1900 election, by 1906 there had been more deaths than Britain expected and it had been much more drawn out. The Boer War also helped unveil the poverty…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imperialism is a policy when a powerful nation seeks to take over a country economically, socially, and politically.(ch11sec1)During this period of time, 7 different European nations wanted to take over the different parts of Africa. European nations were able to take over these countries because of their military means and warfare skills. European nations wanted to take over Africa for their natural resources and raw materials.(ch11sec3-4)The seven European nations took over Africa for political, economic, and competitive reasons. These nations wanted to be superior than each other. Competition was the main reason why imperialism occurred in South Africa.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The British wanted the fertile soils, diamond mines, and gold deposits of South Africa, but the Zulu tribe stood in their way. The British sent 30,000 troops led by Lord Chelmsford to battle the Zulu nation. As a result, 15,000 Zulus died reducing them to a small quantity. In the final battle in 1899, the British completely wiped out the Zulus and their civilization. In effect, the rest of South Africa fell under British hands. Over in Kenya, the British fought and killed 12,000 Kenyans during the Mau Mau Rebellion, some of them died in confinement camps . A few thousands more were displaced or driven away from the country, leaving their people scattered in neighboring countries. Europeans didn't only bring troops over, they brought diseases too. Rinderpest, a European livestock disease killed off 90-95% of the live cattle in Africa and other grazing animals. The lack of grazing animals changed the landscape that made it easier for tsetse fly to nest. The tsetse flies spread a sleeping sickness that killed about 200,000 Ugandans from 1902-1906 . African tribes were very dependent on their livestock; as a result, tribes like the Maasai in Tanzania lost two thirds of their population. The livestock diseases also brought with it epizootic, a lung disease that hit many animals in South Africa . Other diseases from the Europeans that affected the continent greatly were smallpox and malaria because the Africans didn't have much immunity to them. Disease became a huge factor in the deaths of the African continent, both directly and indirectly; without livestock comes no food, which leads to starvation. However, these weren't the British's intentions. One of their main intentions of colonizing Africa was for their resources. Diamond mining was very profitable for the British in South Africa. They used slave labor force (the South Africans) to dig out the diamonds and left the higher and more important…

    • 1690 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Life in Africa isn’t what it seems, they have this driving force behind European imperialism. All in all European nations competed with one another for control within the nations. The driving force behind European imperialism in Africa was imports, exports, technology, and malaria.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A.J Balfour was an intelligent man yet lacked political skills causing him to make poorly judged decisions leading to a decrease in conservative’s votes. During the Boer War, 1898-1902, Balfour used Britain’s patriotism to help the Tories win the 1900 ‘Khati Election’. By doing this it allowed Britain to stay involved in the Boer war, not knowing that war would last 4 years and cost Britain over 210 million pounds. This highlighted to the British people how the Conservatives neglect poverty and social reform, and by 1902 it was officially reported by the army high command that nearly two-thirds of those who had volunteered to join the services failed to pass their basic medical test. This information was further supported by Charles Booth and Seebohn Rowntree’s research, as Booth published 17 volumes on the life and labour of London’s poor between 1889 and 1903. Rowntree set out to test Booth’s statistics in York and began his investigation in 1899. Their conclusions stated that 30% of the urban population would be classified as ‘poor’ and that about 20% might be classified as ‘very poor’ or as living in ‘primary poverty’. Booth and Rowntree’s research later proved that more than a quarter of the population lived below the subsistence level, highlighting that people where too malnourished and medically unfit to be accepted into the army. Subsequently the Conservatives lost nine seats in the general election 1900, whilst both liberal and labour gained seven and two seats.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits to Africa as a result of imperialism were plentiful. A primary document, “Does Colonization Pay”, details the many improvements made to the continent; Africa was home to innumerable, rich resources. As a result, Europe was able to utilize these as raw materials, and return the money to Africa. The money was also used to bring the people of Africa food supply, as well as other supplies that were much needed. Besides this, these nations created “roads, canals, railways, and telegraphs”, along with “schools and newspapers” (Document 1). As displayed by the information, imperialism was seen to have profound effects on Africa. Not only did they utilize the rich resources to supply economic gain to the continent, but also significantly developed the continent by providing means of transportation, education, and a source of news. Unfortunately, these benefits were not of significant value due to the immense oppression experienced by the people of Africa during the age of imperialism.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism has been around for many years. Throughout history, countries have extended their rule and government to other countries. During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, imperialism became an important issue in Africa. The Europeans began colonizing parts of Africa. These imperialistic movements had varying effects, some with positive repercussions, while other effects ended negatively.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boer war had effects on the soldiers on both sides of the war, the indigenous people of South Africa and the families of the Boer soldiers. The Boers were constantly shelling the British and this meant that the British soldiers could not move openly during the day and had to camp in insanitary dugouts rather than in the open, which accelerated the spread of disease in the British camp. Evidentially, this is a social impact and has affected South…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The explanation of why there is such a distinct difference between poor countries and wealthy countries lies in their geography and their access to guns, germs, and steel. The answer seems too simple to many people who disagree with Jared Diamond. However, it doesn’t change the fact that it all makes complete sense. The lines between successful civilizations and unsuccessful ones are all based on the resources the landscape provides. The New Guineans, Incas, and Africans never had the opportunity and resources to develop advanced technology like the Europeans and early middle easterners did. The New Guineans and Africans are immensely culturally diverse and highly adaptable people. So it wouldn’t be hard to assume that they are also among the…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the 20th century approached, more and more countries wanted more and more power. At the end of the 19th century, the Belgian King Leopold sent emissaries to the African Congo to establish trade. This single act caused France, Belgium, Great Britain, Germany, Spain, Italy and Portugal to go over to Africa and do the same. However, the European countries did not just establish trade, they invaded the African territory and took control over it. This became known as the Imperialist Scramble for Africa.1…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered about European Imperialism in Africa? Well wonder no longer. The three main effects that they hoped to achieve were Economic Value, Political Competition, and Cultural Attitude.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism In Africa

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How has the scramble for Africa affected Africans? Europeans have always been known to take over many territories. For example, the British have expanded their empire to Australia, Asia, and even the Americas. Although these changes have made what the world is today, nothing has changed more than Africa. Before Colonialism occurred, Africa traded with other parts of the world for centuries (RP #1). In the nineteenth century, the Europeans started to notice that Africa could be a “gold mine” for their own economy. As more Europeans started to invade Africa, much of Imperialism took place. The two main reasons for Imperialism and Colonialism in Africa were for trade and territorial control.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are several reasons why the European nations competed with each other to gain colonies in Africa. They all wanted to gain power and prestige. The more territory that they were able to control in Africa the more powerful and important they thought they could become. Africa was tremendously rich in natural resources, which could be brought to Europe and turned into manufactured goods. Europeans also needed markets for their manufactured goods. These goods could be sold in Africa for large profits. Often a European nation would take over territory in Africa simply to prevent another European country from taking it.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics