The Effect of External Factors Upon Cardiovascular System and Its Controlling Mechanisms.
BMS 1515 Human Sciences - Reflective feedback/Feedforward Form – to be submitted with the final assignment Make this PAGE 1 of your assignment!!
NAME: HAIDER SHEIKH STUDENT NUMBER: M00398469
What did you understand from the lecturer’s feedback comments on your formative lab report?- title was not illustrative enough, just a mere two words. - Abstract was superficial, not focussed upon the subject area and lacked specificity. - Abstract did not have aims, the origin of experiment and the usage, the key results were missing and there were no significant data present. - Introduction is a short review not a paragraph on unfocussed research that is undirected. - Don’t give hypothesis as a personal opinion- good representation of results- NO analysis and part of discussion missing due to uploading error as the document fails to load. | What were the main areas for improvement?- Analysis- Introduction- Discussion- Abstract | How have you used the feedback to prepare and present your work and final submission?- I have spent much time on my abstract and made it directed and specific to the area topic I am doing my lab report in. - I have learned not to use hypothesis as a personal opinion but as a ‘theory’ that needs to be backed up by data.- I have spent time on analysis and discussion, trying to show it direction and also interrogated the results, just as requested by my lecturer. | How did you find receiving feedback without an attached grade?I found the review to be exceptionally detailed and to the point. The review was straightforward and harsh, which allowed me to see my mistakes and take them fully on board to enhance my work upto a 2:1 standard at least. The review also helped me to see how much I understood about writing reports and that my way was completely wrong in terms of approaching and interpreting my data. The biggest thing was that the review was true and to the point, and not sugar coated. Hopefully, I will use this review to enhance
NAME: HAIDER SHEIKH STUDENT NUMBER: M00398469
What did you understand from the lecturer’s feedback comments on your formative lab report?- title was not illustrative enough, just a mere two words. - Abstract was superficial, not focussed upon the subject area and lacked specificity. - Abstract did not have aims, the origin of experiment and the usage, the key results were missing and there were no significant data present. - Introduction is a short review not a paragraph on unfocussed research that is undirected. - Don’t give hypothesis as a personal opinion- good representation of results- NO analysis and part of discussion missing due to uploading error as the document fails to load. | What were the main areas for improvement?- Analysis- Introduction- Discussion- Abstract | How have you used the feedback to prepare and present your work and final submission?- I have spent much time on my abstract and made it directed and specific to the area topic I am doing my lab report in. - I have learned not to use hypothesis as a personal opinion but as a ‘theory’ that needs to be backed up by data.- I have spent time on analysis and discussion, trying to show it direction and also interrogated the results, just as requested by my lecturer. | How did you find receiving feedback without an attached grade?I found the review to be exceptionally detailed and to the point. The review was straightforward and harsh, which allowed me to see my mistakes and take them fully on board to enhance my work upto a 2:1 standard at least. The review also helped me to see how much I understood about writing reports and that my way was completely wrong in terms of approaching and interpreting my data. The biggest thing was that the review was true and to the point, and not sugar coated. Hopefully, I will use this review to enhance