Kevin Lane Keller, Susan E Heckler, Michael J Houston. Journal of Marketing. Chicago:Jan 1998. Vol. 62, Iss. 1, p. 48-57 (9 pp.) |
Abstract (Summary)A study reports the results of a laboratory experiment examining the effects of the meaningfulness of brand names on recall of advertising. Findings indicate that a brand name explicitly conveying a product benefit leads to higher recall of an advertising benefit claim consistent in meaning with the brand name compared with a nonsuggestive brand name. Conversely, a suggestive brand name leads to lower recall of a subsequently advertise benefit claim unrelated in product meaning compared with a nonsuggestive brand name. Implications of these findings for marketers with respect to advertising strategies and the optimal use of meaningful brand names in building and managing brand equity are discussed. Full Text (7137 words) |
Copyright American Marketing Association Jan 1998 [Headnote] | Kevin Lane Keller, Susan E. Heckler, & Michael J. Houston | [Headnote] | The authors report the results of a laboratory experiment examining the effects of the meaningfulness of brand names on recall of advertising. The findings indicate that a brand name explicitly conveying a product benefit (e.g., PicturePerfect televisions) leads to higher recall of an advertised benefit claim consistent in meaning with the brand name compared with a nonsuggestive brand name (e.g., Emporium televisions). Conversely, a suggestive brand name leads to lower recall of a subsequently advertised benefit claim unrelated in product meaning (e.g., superior sound) compared with a nonsuggestive brand name. The authors discuss implications of these findings for marketers with respect to advertising strategies and the optimal use of meaningful brand names in building and managing brand equity. |
Brand names come in many different forms-they can be based on real people,