In this case study I will examine the forensic evidence (limited to the main ballistic evidence), that was presented in the criminal trials and the forensic evidence that was introduced by the prosecution.…
Introduction:Dna evidence has been known for many years in crime scenes.Dna evidence was first discovered in 1986.Dna evidence can find anyone by finding blood,skin cells,hair,saliva,and semen.Dna evidence can be good at finding people 95% at a time,because of the cells in the dna.…
2. Forensic science has been increasingly used by the criminal justice system because of its growing accessibility. Technological advances over the last hundred years have made methods such as finger printing, blood and DNA analysis, and other forms of identification much easier for forensic scientists to perform, thus paving the way for the development of this field. Similarly, there has been an increased popularity for…
Technology is rapidly changing every aspect of the criminal justice system as computers make possible the streamlining of many procedures, shortening their time span and increasing their accuracy. Techniques used in the collection, processing and storage of evidence benefit from these recent developments.…
In the criminal justice investigation process forensic science and the scientific method are used. The collecting of the evidence is a very important procedure and should be done with…
Houck, M. M., & Siegal, J. A. (2010). Fundamentals of Forensic Science (2 ed.). Burlington: Elsevier.…
References: * Byrd, M. (2001). Crime Scene Evidence: A Guide to the Recovery and Collection of Physical…
Often times lines become blurred regarding inductions and deductive reasoning as they apply to forensic sciences. Inductions are described by Thornton (1997b, p. 13) as an inference that is derived by specific observations to a generalization, or an assumption that may not always be valid. On the other hand, a deductive reasoning is defined as a forensics-evidence-based, process-oriented method of investigative reasoning based off of the behavioral patterns of a particular offender (Turvey, 1999). Historically, forensic scientists have failed to recognize the importance of inductions and deductive reasoning as a critical process in conducting investigations. Thus resulting in a hypothesis being falsely categorized as a deductive conclusion; when in fact it remains nothing more than a statement until supported by follow on testing (Thornton & Kirk, 1997).…
This took place in Englewood, Colorado in 1993. The girl was kidnapped from her apartment complex, where she was eating pizza with other children in the parking lot. The police had put out a giant search for her. The search included policemen, fire workers, and scent-tracking dogs. Her body was found four days after the kidnapping, about fourteen miles away from her home. They examined her body and they found someone else’s fingerprint on her underwear. It belonged to her neighbor, Nick Stofer. At the time, they didn’t have the right technology to solve the case using just a fingerprint. Since they didn’t have any other evidence, Nick Stofer was never arrested. Over time, the police department had started using DNA technology in criminal cases. Eighteen years later, they reopened the case and matched the DNA they found on Alie Berrelez’s underwear, to Nick Stofer. However, he was not arrested because he had died ten years prior. (ABCNEWS).This case shows that DNA technology in crimes is best way of solving cases. If it was not for the technology, the case would forever be unsolved. Also, many other cases may have gone unsolved because of the lack of DNA technology. This is why DNA technology in crimes should be more…
“The CSI Effect is a recent phenomenon that can be attributed to the influence of mass media. The term started appearing in legal lexicon in 2003; roughly 3 years after the show and its spin-offs became wildly popular options for the American public” (Heinrick 59). This so called “CSI Effect”, is creating major controversy in the courtroom. There is such a large different between what the media depicts and real forensic science that jurors now believe that they are more educated than prosecutors themselves. It is becoming extremely important that attorneys, judges, and anyone else involved in a case to be aware that jurors are expecting great things in regards to forensic evidence. If the “CSI Effect” is ignored within the courtroom, there is no telling what will happen. The guilty may be let free or the innocent could be wrongfully accused of something they didn’t do. In addition to the “CSI Effect”, another similar effect that has been formed because of CSI-type shows is the “Tech Effect”. The “Tech Effect” is very similar to the “CSI Effect” and is defined as a mentality in which jurors “hold higher expectations for forensic evidence because of the actual development in forensic technology” (Cole & Dioso-Villa 1345). Both the “CSI Effect” and the “Tech Effect” affirm that reality crime shows are changing the minds of its viewers, while some forensic accomplishments have been…
The search for physical evidence at a crime scene must be done thoroughly and followed by the protocol. How the criminalist will decide to execute the crime-scene investigation depends on the size and the locale of the area, as well as on the actions of the suspect(s) and victim(s) at the scene. It must be considered that physical evidence can be anything, from a massive object to a microscopic trace, however, some evidence are clearly visible but others need to be examined in the laboratory in order to be detected. Physical evidence must be processed in a way so as to prevent any change from happening between the time that was collected on the crime scene and the time it is received by the laboratory. When collecting physical evidence from a scene, any criminalist must be aware of the fact that recovery of one type of evidence can destroy another.…
A type of procedure that is most commonly presented in trials is DNA profiling. DNA profiling is a type of identification testing. The testing uses DNA samples taken from suspects or the crime scene to generate a person’s profile. A match can therefore statistically prove the likelihood of that sample’s relation to the suspect or crime…
Forensics is the application of science to find clues and solve crimes. There are many areas of forensics such as: forensic toxicology, genetic fingerprinting, and forensic pathology. Most of the forensic scientists are investigators that pick up clues at the crime scene. Criminals usually leave behind evidence that allow an investigator to track them (MegaEssays, 2011). This all contributes to the criminalistics aspects of forensics. Criminalistics is the recognition, identification, and the evaluation of physical evidence by applying the laws of science and natural science (WriteWork, 2004). They identify physical evidence and find its origin. Criminalistics differs greatly from the criminology aspect of forensic because criminology deals with the relationship between the criminal and society. It comes up with theories to explain how society functions with crime; it is possible for individuals to understand some different stances on how crime is created in a society and how a society may influence an individual's decision to commit a particular crime (ArticlesBase, 2010). In today’s society there are many TV shows which capture and get into the minds of its viewers. They reel you in, in…
The use of DNA technology has increased the probability of finding the culprit and also prevents further crimes. Compared to the past, with DNA technology, today “more than twice as many suspects are[were] identified, twice as many suspects are[were] arrested and more than twice as many cases are accepted for prosecution” (Ritter, 2008). This is because of higher availability of DNA sources and uniqueness of DNA. Between two people, 99.9…
To explain how criminal law works, here is one recent Supreme Court case that is calling the attention of many people. In 2009, the police of Maryland arrest Alonzo Jay King, for first- and second-degree assault. During the arrest, Maryland police were authorized to collect King’s DNA. When the results comeback, surprise King's DNA "matched a prior set of DNA data collected in a separate 2003 rape case that remained unsolved" (Cowen & Park, 2007).…