The Egyptians’ view of the afterlife contrasts with the Mesopotamian’s view in that the Egyptians believed in the afterlife as a continuation of life on earth and the Mesopotamians believed life after death would be a miserable existence. The geographical location of the two civilizations may have influenced their views on the afterlife. The Egyptians were blessed with fertile land that came regularly, which was thought to be the work of the gods. This led the Egyptians to believe the gods were generous and helpful, which is expressed by the gods’ role in the afterlife as the providers or caretakers for the Egyptians’ souls. This belief is conveyed through the Egyptians reverence of the gods in saying, “Hail, O all ye gods of the House of Soul.” Conversely, the Mesopotamians were plagued with unpredictable, life-threatening floods that led them to believe the gods cared very little for the Mesopotamians, or the gods were trying to harm them, so the Mesopotamian’s afterlife would be miserable. The Mesopotamians wrote,“There is a house where people sit in darkness; dust is their food and clay their meat... They who had stood in the place of gods...now stood like servants,” expressing their fear that life after death would be a time of hardship and servitude. This fear of death was the reason for the Mesopotamian’s interest in immortality, opposed to the Egyptian’s readiness for death. The geographical location of the two early civilizations led to differing beliefs of what happens after death.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Egyptians believed that a body had to be properly prepared in order to live on in a similar way in the afterlife, more importantly, they thought the body had to be preserved. The Egyptians embalmed and mummified their dead to preserve them, the body needed to be accompanied by its Ba and Ka, the person’s dead spirit and the person’s life energy. It would also need familiar possessions to take with him/her.…
- 414 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Egyptian religion was polytheistic which meant that they believed in more than one god. They also thought how you acted in your life on earth will affect you in the after life. This is why many rulers were buried with a lot of their gold and precious items. Some of the kings and queens had servants killed and buried with them so they would be able to service them in the after…
- 1012 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Apart from the pyramid texts, the coffin texts from Duat reveal the contribution of religion shaping the Egyptian’s bureaucracy because they seem to represent a collection of funeral spells that were written on the coffins. The texts were reserved only for the royal family; however, they had elements that signified everyday desires such as (ADD THE ELEMENTS). The ordinary people who could pay for a coffin could access the funerary spells, barring the Pharaoh from having exclusive rights to life after death. The content of the coffin texts from Duat, unlike the pyramid texts that focused on the celestial realm, placed emphasis on the subterranean elements of life after death. The texts seemed to have given hope to everyone in the locality…
- 1083 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The Nile was an important part of their afterlife, too. In the Egyptian afterlife, a dead person had to have their heart weighed, and if the heart was the “right” weight, they could pass into the Field of Reeds (Doc. D). In the Field of Reeds, Egyptians would farm crops such emmer wheat and flax (which was weave into linen cloth) (Doc. D). There were also trees, date palms, and ornamental planets (Doc. D). The Nile, even in the afterlife, was the source for all this beauty and wonder. This proves how the Nile shaped the Egyptian view of the afterlife.…
- 625 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In parallel to most other civilizations of the time Mesopotamians worshiped a variety of different higher gods and goddesses who were thought to be in charge of various facets of everyday life. The Mesopotamians polytheism was a little different than others though-they thought of their gods and goddesses as the same as normal humans (foolish, selfish, angry etc.) except for the fact that they were immortal and supremely powerful. The Mesopotamian afterlife was also a bit more dark and dreary than that of later…
- 539 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Ancient Egypt and Ancient Mesopotamia had very different outlooks on life. The Mesopotamians viewed humankind as caught in an inherently disorderly world, and subject to whims of quarreling gods. By contrast, the Ancient Egyptians had a more cheerful and hopeful outlook on the world. Also, the Mesopotamians didn't have much hope of a good after life, while the Egyptians did. These different views were developed because of the different environments they were in. The Mesopotamians developed this outlook in a precarious, unpredictable, and violent environment, but the Egyptians were in a more stable, predictable, and beneficial environment. These things clearly show how different there outlooks on life were.…
- 338 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The different civilizations in Mesopotamia were not united by a single language or government; they did however have a common world view and a common belief system of polytheism. Mesopotamia’s gods and goddesses were associated with the forces of nature. The gods and goddesses of Mesopotamia shared characteristics with the climate such as fierce and capricious. With the division of labor came the development of social order. The social order prevailed around 2700 BCE. In the first civilizations each different class had certain responsibilities that contributed to the society. There is a theme of searching for immortality in Mesopotamian literature. This shows how the Mesopotamian people were on a journey to find the physical limits of human beings. The people could be described as insecure of their vulnerability.…
- 1446 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Egypt and Mesopotamia were both flourishing examples of civilization in their day, yet their worldview differed drastically: Mesopotamia had a negative outlook upon the world and life in general, whereas Egyptians had a much more positive worldview. The negative worldview of the Mesopotamians was most likely caused by the instability within their lives. For example, their two major rivers—The Tigris and The Euphrates—flooded wildly at unpredictable times, ruining crops and causing mass starvation. Being unable to know, each year, whether farms would be able to yield enough crops to feed the population definitely would have added to the negative attitude of the Mesopotamians. Another contributor to their negative worldview was how easy it was for armies to invade. Because there were no mountains or other natural barriers in place, marauding armies had no trouble marching across the flatlands of Mesopotamia in order to pillage and loot villages and farms outside of large cities. Mesopotamian commoners, who didn’t live within the protective walls of citadels, were often subject to the raids of roaming armies, and thus were unable to feel safe, adding further to a negative worldview. Another reason Mesopotamians had a negative worldview was their religion. They viewed the gods as bickering deities, who had no problem smiting down people and razing cities just for their silly whims. Furthermore, they believed that the afterlife was nothing more than a dreary world where souls would bide out eternity in. All of these factors contributed to Mesopotamians believing that the world was little more than a prison of suffering which would go on to lead to an endless existence of emptiness. In complete contrast to the Mesopotamians, the Egyptians had a far more stable lifestyle, and thus a much more positive worldview. Unlike the wild Tigris and Euphrates, the major river of…
- 572 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Mesopotamia and Egypt had similar religious beliefs. Mesopotamia was a polytheistic religion. They had gods like UR and Uruk. Egypt was also a polytheistic religion,with gods like Isis and Osiris. They created different gods which helped to explain why different things occurred. Like wheather and other natural events that happened. Both Ancient River Civilizations believed that their rulers were tied to the gods. Egyptians believed that once their pharaoh died, they will become a god. Mesopotamia and Egypt both believed in the afterlife. The Mesopotamian people believed that the dead souls went to the Land of No Return, and the Egyptians preserved the dead by mummification, because they believed that their spirit still lived even after death.…
- 391 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Egyptians believed that when a king died, his spiritual body returned to its original abode with the gods. The Egyptians felt it was their duty to worship the kings even after they left earth. By having festivals at the tombs, placing offerings of food in the grave of the dead to prevent them from returning, and praying for the welfare of the dead; they believed that their offerings helped the kings find their way to the gods above. “This happy result was partly by the performance of certain ceremonies which first wholly magical, but late, partly magical and partly religious” (3).…
- 535 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
They also believed that any nobility they had as a mortal was no longer recognized nor relevant. This meant that even the greatest rulers wouldn’t be recognized as a noble in front of the gods of death. Their ideas about afterlife wasn’t dependent on what they did while they were living that determined how their afterlife would be, it really didn’t matter what they did while they were living, everyone was going to the same place. Death for the Mesopotamian people was believed to be in the hands of the gods. The gods decided when and how a person would die and once that decision was made there was nothing they could do to prevent it. This was shown with the death of Endiku. The Gods made the decision that Endiku should die because of his actions with Gilgamesh. The gods had a lot of power it was kind of like their life was in their hands. They could also punish them if they did something that didn’t approve of or not doing what they were told to do. For example, Anu sending the bull after Gilgamesh because he didn’t want to date his daughter. It’s also…
- 500 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
1-The Mesopotamian’s believed in the afterlife and had a myth that they believed in known as “The Epic of Gilgamesh.”…
- 430 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout history different cultures the early stages of human development, the Mesopotamian and Egyptian cultures shared many of the same qualities and beliefs, but they also differed in many aspects. Found in prehistoric texts, there is a transition from ancient beliefs to more modern beliefs. In addition, the afterlife, along with relationships between gods and humans, responsibilities of rulers and hierarchy, and organized civilizations are all topics that provide differing viewpoints between the two civilizations.…
- 751 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
1. The Mesopotamian view of the afterlife was a place known as the land of no return. It was completely filled with darkness and the people there see no light. It is the house from which none who enters ever returns. Anyone who held a high name in the mortal world will serve the gods.…
- 1545 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Both Egypt and Mesopotamia believed in many gods. In Mesopotamia they had massive destruction of their crops and lands because of the flooding, they believed that their god had exceptional powers so they had to keep the gods satisfied. In order to maintain them they offered food to the gods. While in Egypt it was calm and mother earth was not acting up, Egyptians believed that their place was designed as some shelter in a world so chaotic. Egyptians believed in preserving their bodies in order to supply the important tools that they would need for their afterlife. Overall Egypt and Mesopotamia left their marks and thanks to them we are able to benefit from many things that they created as a…
- 471 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays