Intake: April 2013
Qeustion:
In the story titled Elephant, how does Raymond Carver focus on the elephant literally and figuratively? “The writing style of Raymond Carver’s short story entitled “Elephant” represent a simplistic, yet strong style of writing that is reminiscent of the great work of Earnest Hemmingway. There are several ways in which the writing style within Elephant harkens back to the stylistics of Hemmingway. Carver always goes straight to the point; like Hemmingway he focuses on describing the action and minimizes his analysis of that action. This is not saying that he does not analyse what his family is doing to him or what he is going through, but rather he presents his case simply and concisely so that the reader can naturally understand these feelings rather than having to engage in a long drawn out discussion of them, for example, “I didn’t hear from my former wife. I didn’t have to. We both knew how things stood there,”. Although not every American has such need and dependent family members, we all have experienced money problems with many of us knowing what it feels like to be taken advantage of.” Raymond carver: A critical Consideration of diction Raymond Carver utilizes many different literary devices to manipulate his short stories. Out of all the possible literary tools, I feel that his change of words is the most important in creating a “hook” that captures a reader. He tends to take a seemingly unimportant, commonplace event and turn it into a very interesting moment. There is a direct correlation between this diction and how these ordinary events become so intricate. He has been known to revise his stories many different times, and thus, has different versions of them. One of the main purposes of revising is to ascertain exactly the best language and words to emphasize a theme or point within a story. He uses these exact measures to ensure that he can maximize the impact of his stories. This heightened text often leaves ambiguous meanings and interpretations in his work. In Elephant, a man is driven to the end of his tether by his family who are always taking money from him. His brother first borrows some money form him and then says that he would pay their mother instead of giving the money back to the writer. Unfortunately, the brother only gives fifty dollars or either seventy five dollars in three months although he had borrowed five hundred dollars. The mother said that her younger son, Billy was in bad shape and he was not going to pay and he did not pay like she predicted. She also said that he was giving al the normal excuses that somebody would give when they have a commitment and she, the mother went checking in mail boxes for the cheque that should come every month. He sends his other a cheque every month because she guilt trips him about being alone and how nobody cares about her. He sends his daughter a cheque every month because her husband is a layabout slob and she’s afraid she won’t be able to feed the kids. The daughter was just evoking sympathy from her father so that the father will help. She says that she will work in the fish cannery or sell root beer from a vending stand beside the road. As a father, obviously he would not want his daughter to be doing jobs like that so, he sends money instead just to support her family. The daughter also adds on by saying that her children has been drawing pictures of swing sets and swimming pool at the motel that he stayed in when he visited them last year. This is because her children will only get to go out, eat good food and have maximum fun when their grandfather is there because he spends money on them. He sends his ex-wife a cheque every month to pay for his children. His former wife really did not care about what was going on. She didn’t have too. All she knew was that she would get her money the first of each month, even if it had to come all the way from Sydney. If she didn’t get it, she just has to pick up the phone and call her lawyer. He reaches a breaking point when he has to send his wastrel son a cheque every month because he’s off exploring America to ‘find’ himself. His son said that he would sell drugs in order to get money, but no father would allow that to happen so, he has no choice but to send money to his son. It is a complex story that peels back the layers of everyday life an experiences written in deceptively simple language. In the story Elephant, the figurative focus that the writer used was he compared his own family members to the white elephant. A white elephant means somebody who is a burden to you or somebody you have to keep even if you don’t want too. His family members are a gift from God that he has to keep even if he don’t want them because they are such burden to him. He works so hard to get the money and they borrow, ask and demand as they wish. First of all, a brother who requires loaning him some money and never pays back yet asks for more money later. As the writer taught, people who borrows money and does not pay back would not come back asking for more money but his brother did. Then coming in the list is his mother who is greedy. She wants the cheque no matter what happens and then his daughter who just evokes sympathy from him to get the money. Next, not forgetting his former wife who just wants the money every first of the month and does not care what happens. If she does not get the money she would call her lawyer. Last in the list is his son who is the first to go to college but he also demands for money from his father by emotional black mailing saying he would be a drug dealer in order to get some money. In a nut shell, Raymond Carver who works so hard to earn money is just being too nice to his family members by not being able to say no to a certain things is just being used up by his own family as the source of money. Those being the white elephants in his life are making him undergo stress that he has to work till he is old and he is not being able to get enough rest just because he has to give money to his family. He was very tired always after work that it took him awhile to even bend down and unlace his shoes and just too tired to even get up and switch on the TV.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Reading about Ahn Do 's childhood having to struggle with poverty generates sympathy towards him. Ahn talks about his job of pamphlet delivery at the age of fourteen to earn money and help his mother and the rest of his family out financially. Ahn mentions the hardship he went through during the job through first person point of view such as 'I slung the straps over my shoulders and it was lumpy and unbalanced ' carrying a forty kilogram worth of pamphlets in his old school bag and 'Ten p.m. that night we slumped into bed absolutely exhausted. We still had about third to go…I 'd never intended for my whole family to have to labour with me; the idea was for Mum to work less…sitting at a table madly trying to squeeze in my homework '. Through this technique, readers to how he felt, what happened to him and how it made him feel which invite the readers to respond with sympathy towards his problems with money at a young age.…
- 684 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Short story, The Painted door, by Sinclair Ross, follows the life of a woman and a man living on a quiet, secluded farm. The woman, Ann, is a very confused person who is seemed to be unsatisfied with her marriage. Her Husband, John, is a very hard working farmer who works his hardest so that he can provide for him and his wife. He enjoys the simpler things in life, yet his wife, Ann, cannot. Nothing is good enough for her. Her selfish ways are evident in her attitude toward the material things in her home environment and in the way she treats her husband. Through the heavy use of imagery in the story “The Painted door” Ross effectively shows how lonely Ann is.…
- 724 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Raymond Carver’s portrayal of the setting, the physical environment and the homes his characters inhabit completely correlate to a sentimental connection the characters have in their particular stories. Common themes of conflict, acceptance, and separation signify the characters struggle within the stories, more so relating to the differences with their significant others or their family. Carver’s use of household separation and the seasonal influence within the story “A Serious Talk” signifies the characters indifferences as the story progresses. As for the story “Popular Mechanics”, the setting helps foreshadow the relationship at the brink of a devastating occurrence/interpretation. Furthermore, this paper will identify the significance…
- 119 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
The narrator in Carver's "Cathedral" changes his point of viewat the end of the story. In the story, the man is seen with his wife, but has some arguments between each other. The following paragraphs will include the original thinking of the narrator, what is the key point for him to change, and how does he change at the end of the story.…
- 401 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
By constructing a theme of transformation, Carver is able to identify with his audience. People in everyday life change and evolve. They are all philosophically in search of a moral and meaningful life. In “Cathedral,” the narrator evolves from an indifferent, callous antihero into someone who is no longer restricted by the limitations he places on…
- 613 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the piece “At the edge of Poverty” David Shipler tells about the world of “the forgotten Americans”. The people who can’t save, can’t get a better job, and cannot move on to a better life. He shows us how hard it is to be someone like that, to be on the edge of poverty. He brings us to a different level of understanding of what these people go though and how they are almost are stuck in society, only to dream for a better future. In this well written piece, Shipler does a wonderful job of grabbing and keeping the attention of the reader with many techniques. He uses metaphors, pathos, dramatically short sentences, imagery and many more techniques. Shipler does, though, have two of his best techniques that he uses to really make this piece…
- 1048 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The purpose of this short story is to make the reader feel indignant and angry with the husband and compassion and sympathy for the wife. Brush uses diction and imagery to invoke these emotions in the reader.…
- 408 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Raymond Carver, Jr. was an American short story author and poet. He was born in 1938 and died in 1988. He was married twice, struggled with drugs and alcoholism, and was an unsuccessful writer early on in his career. It was not until his publication of “Cathedral” that he gained success. Carver even believed that “Cathedral was a watershed in his career, in its shift towards a more optimistic and confidently poetic style” (Arciniegas). “Cathedral” starts out slow, spending most of the short story on the back story of the narrator’s wife and a blind man. The story progresses with the three characters doing mostly everyday things, eating, talking, and drinking. While this happens, the narrator’s ideas of the blind are challenged little by…
- 1294 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
2. Choose an essay which puts across a strong personal belief in a clear and convincing manor.…
- 865 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Raymond Carver is probably best known for his minimalist style. A lot of his stories followed this style of writing. He was dedicated to his short stories and was even quoted as saying he was “hooked on writing short stories” (Carver, Maturity: Cathedral 2). One of the reasons he wrote short stories and used his minimalist style was because of his life. He had other jobs so he worked a lot of the time and wrote in his spare time which made writing short stories more feasible, not to mention he liked writing them. His minimalist style was impressed upon him by editors of the papers he wrote for who demanded it. Carver’s form of minimalism is a unique one which grew throughout his literary career and no works better show that then “The Bath” and the later version “A Small Good Thing.” Both stories have the same central plot and most of the details remain the same, but the way Carver tells each story is dramatically different. His earlier stories use this same minimalist style but we see a change and even growth in his writing as he moves away from minimalism and embraces description.…
- 828 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
DISCUSS ORWELL'S USE OF PERSUASIVE TOOLS SUCH AS, SYMBOLISM, METAPHORS AND IRONY IN THIS ESSAY AND EXPLAIN HOW HE USES EACH OF THESE TO CONVEY HIS ARGUMENT OR MESSAGE…
- 840 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A “worldview” is a way of thinking about what is real and true. It is a term that describes a total way of viewing the world around you and the framework from which we view reality and make sense of life and the world. A "worldview" is a term that describes a complete way of viewing the world around you A world view is an arrangement of beliefs which we hold about the basic make-up of our world. In order to have a world view, one needs to be religious. A person’s basic beliefs, practices, and association are seen through the eyes of a worldview.…
- 1213 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The story that my evaluation will be based on is Shooting an Elephant written in 1936. The author George Orwell was born in 1903 in India to a British officer raised in England. He attended Eton College, which introduced him to England's middle and upper classes. He was denied a scholarship, which led him to become a police officer for the Indian Imperial in 1922. He served in Burma until resigning in 1927 due to the lack of respect for the justice of British Imperialism in Burma and India. He was now determined to become a writer, so at the brink of poverty he began to pay close attention to social outcasts and laborers. This led him to write Down and Out in Paris and London (1933) during the Spanish Civil War. He embodied his hate for totalitarian system in his book Animal Farm (1945). George Orwell fell to the disease of tuberculosis at forty-seven, but not before he released many works. He wrote six novels, three documentary works, over seven hundred reviews and newspaper articles, and a volume of essays (1149). This particular story was very interesting and found it to hold a lot of truth. Shooting an Elephant is about an English man that was a police officer in Burman, who was hated for his race and felt it almost impossible to do his job. He had to deal with a lot of hatred and disrespect, but yet he was expected to do what the town's people asked of him when they asked. When the elephant got loose the first person the sub-inspector at the opposite end of the town called was the main character, who was to be nameless throughout the entire story. He wanted him to go do something about the loose elephant because the mahout (the keeper and driver of an elephant) was away and no one else could handle a situation such as this. The main character grabbed his 44 rifle and set out to find the elephant. The purpose of the gun was not to kill the elephant but to just scare it with the noise. Little did the officer know the act of grabbing the gun to just scare the…
- 1383 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
In George Orwell 's dialogue Shooting an Elephant, he accentuates the grave aversion that he has for being a police officer in Moulmein. The author uses many literary devices to depict his controversy with killing the elephant or not, such as foreshadowing, and speaking in first person, and appealing to pathos. The main element used in this dialogue is conflict, Orwell shows how he contemplates on whether to shoot the elephant or not. The literary elements that Orwell presents all help convey the point of showing how conflicted he is with himself, a theme that is well portrayed here is Man vs. Himself as well as Man vs. Society.…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the essay “Shooting an Elephant” George Orwell argues that, “when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys.” Free will is indestructible; an example of Orwell’s destruction of freedom but preservation of free will is given in his essay. Humans can always exercise their free will when making decisions. However, when their decisions come in conflict with the laws set by a higher power, they might face consequences based on how they choose to use their free will. According to Orwell his freedom was destroyed when he took on the role of the tyrant. A crisis arose in which he was faced with a hard decision to make. When Orwell came upon the elephant it was clear to him that it had calmed down and that the elephant would cause no more harm to anyone. Orwell was faced with a decision: he could either shoot the beast or wait until his master came to get him. However, this decision was made much more complicated. Two thousand Burmans who, as Orwell said, “were watching me as they would watch a conjurer about to perform a magic trick. They did not like me, but with the magical rifle in my hands I was momentarily worth watching.” Although the Burmans were all underneath him and subject to him, he was very concerned about what they thought he should do. He was so concerned in fact he concluded that he had to do as they wished of him. His freedom to choose whether or not to kill the elephant had been destroyed by himself. How was Orwell able to destroy his own freedom? Orwell explains: “I perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy… the condition of his rule that he shall spend his life in trying to impress the “natives,” and so in every crisis he has got to do what the “natives” expect of him. He wears a mask, and his face grows to fit it. I had got to shoot the elephant.” Orwell’s free will, however, was…
- 467 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays