Preview

The Emancipation of Serfs in 1861

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3297 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Emancipation of Serfs in 1861
What are the reasons for the failure of the Emancipation of Serfdom in 1861?
Abstract
The necessity of reforming society based on serfdom had not been new in XIX century. However the same way, a person with a cancer does not show symptoms of illness in the first stages, the same way it was not apparent that Russia had been economically and industrially “sick” until the defeat in the Crimean War. The most significant reform to remedy Russian backwardness was the Emancipation Edict, followed by a number of jurisdictional, educational and military reforms. The essay focuses on emancipation, as it was the most radical change, representative for the trends and problems in Russia. It discusses the causes why such promising reform proved to be inefficient and unsuccessful, and concludes that the emancipation of serfs was not only imposed by the circumstances exposed by the Crimean War, it was also voluntary reform of the Tsar and even the nobility. The failure laid in the dichotomy of this intention typical for the Russian elite; eager to improve quality of life of every Russian, they were never ready to make any concession on power or wealth. Carefully, but ill-thought Emancipation Edict, therefore had never had any chance of success.
I. The Importance of the Crimean War
When Alexander II became a tsar in 1855, it was obvious that his country would not survive without change. Russia had entered the Crimean War in 1854 with high hopes of victory. Two years later it suffered a heavy defeat at the hands of the Allied armies of France, Britain and Turkey. Unfortunately, the first and by far the most significant reform, the emancipation of the serfs, is often accredited to this defeat. It is a common view among historians, that Russia with its exposed backwardness, an incompetently led, poorly-provisioned, and disease-ridden expeditionary force, realized that its military, social, and economic systems were desperately outmoded, and therefore in the aftermath, they quickly



References: Lynch, M., The emancipation of the Russians serfs, 1861--a charter of freedom or an act of betrayal? History Review, 2001 Retrived on 10th of March, 2011, 2001 from http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-1237264/The-emancipation-of-the-Russians.html Seton-Watson, H. The Russian Empire, 1801-1917, The Oxford Hisotry of Europe, Oxford Univeristy Press, 1967 Moon, D., The abolition of serfdom in Russia, 1762-1907, Pearson Eduction Ltd, 2001 Chapman, T. Imperial Russia 1801-1905, Routledge Publication, 2001 Primary sources for the great reforms [ 3 ]. Seton-Watson, H. The Russian Empire, 1801-1917, The Oxford History of Europe, Oxford University Press, 1967 p. 334 [ 4 ] [ 5 ]. Chapman, T. Imperial Russia 1801-1905, Routledge Publication, 2001 p.84 [ 6 ] [ 9 ]. Lynch, M., The emancipation of the Russians serfs, 1861--a charter of freedom or an act of betrayal? History Review, 2001 [ 10 ] [ 11 ]. Moon, D., The abolition of serfdom in Russia, 1762-1907, Pearson Education Ltd, 2001 [ 12 ] [ 15 ]. Seton-Watson, H. The Russian Empire, 1801-1917, The Oxford History of Europe, Oxford University Press, 1967 [ 16 ] [ 17 ]. Mosse W. E., Alexander II and the Modernization of Russia, London: English Universities Press, 1958 p 33

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Crimean war had highlighted the inadequacies in the Russian military. An example of this would be the lack of war materiel, such as rifles. The Crimean conflict had gone from bad to worse for the Russian military. The largely serf conscript army of the Empire, was poorly trained and poorly disciplined, this led to a number of mass desertions from the battle grounds, with almost The siege of Sevastopol was a sad and crippling defeat for the Russian empire, losing more than a 5th of its forces in the region. Alexander saw this as a triumph for the free troops of Britain and France, and a humiliating defeat for his conscripted and enslaved army. The Crimean war had also led to the eventual realisation that technological inferiority on the side of the Russians led to their defeat, The minister, Dmitri Milyutin, is described as stating quite bluntly, that “Russia must modernise, and it must build railways”. This is also a reference to the multitude of supply problems endured by the military, due to the lack of sufficient infrastructure such as railways. This makes the Crimean war a contributing factor to the Emancipation of the serfs, which defined Alexander II as a reformer.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Huge changes came to Russia when the tsar Alexander II came to power. His reforms freed the serfs and industrialized the nation’s economy. In the past, Russian serfs were tied to the land and worked on the land for the land owners and received no pay. While they were permitted to have farms of their own, serfs had to work the lord’s land whenever called upon, even during times of harvest when their own crops need harvesting or tending. Due to Alexander II’s reforms, these serfs were freed. Once these serfs were freed, they either went into the city to look for work or out to the country to find land. Many also fled to surrounding societies to escape the Russian hardships of being a serf. Russian labor was also changed through Industrialization, also influenced by Alexander II’s reforms. Factories and railroads expanded and industries like coal, steel, and petroleum boomed. Serfs who were emancipated found easy work in factories that were booming. With new industries creating new jobs and plenty of freed serfs to take them, the Russian labor system greatly changed between 1750 and 1914.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first way the Russian state was more stable in 1881 was the increased freedom of the serfs. Serfdom was abolished in 1861, and although the serfs were not completely free, this was a major step for Russia, and helped them catch up to the western countries. This made the state more stable, because it briefly caused a decrease in the number of occasions of peasant unrest, which had been increasing before the decree was passed. It was hoped that the emancipation of the serfs would mean the peasants were free to leave the land they had been previously bound to, but there were many rules that came with the emancipation decree, which made it hard for the peasants to leave, and also to increase their wealth, due to one rule saying they must pay the landlords labour service of two years before they were truly free.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the defeat in the Crimean war Alexander II knew that he had to make new choices if he wanted Russia to get its reputation back, since it had lost its great martial power, which the country took pride in. Alexander II learned that the system that the country had been following all this time was not good enough and needed to change.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agriculture was a crucial area which needed to be reformed if Russia was to ever be modernised. At the root of the inherently backward Russia was the peasant workforce, who mainly worked in the agricultural sector, which left Russia a world away from other European Countries in terms of industry. ‘Out of the 60 million people in European Russia in 1855, 50 million were peasant serfs’1; this was a huge obstacle to modernisation as it limited. The goal of Emancipation was to release the peasants from the land that they were bound to in order to create an industrial workforce that would drive modernisation. The predominantly agricultural workforce would now work in factories thus changing Russia into an industrial juggernaut, which would be key in modernising Russia. The reform was also crucial as it was the first step in the deconstruction of the Ancien Regime within Russia. Emancipation was key in establishing support for the monarchy, ‘in other countries Serf emancipation took place as a consequence of social and organic change’2, this meant that in Russia the monarchy had…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Auty, Robert, and Dimitri Obolensky. 1976. "An Introduction to Russian History (Companion to Russian Studies;1)." Brisol, Great Britain : Cambridge University Press Ltd.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rainie

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Objectives: Student will be able to explain how Ivan III and later Russian rulers began to build a stronger Russian state by investigating the differences between Russia and western Europe. Student will be able to explain the emerging role of Peter the Great by researching Peter’s reforms and their impact on Russia.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dziewanowski, M. K. (2003). Russia in the twentieth century (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The social structure of 1800’s Russia was a rigid hierarchy. According to the 1879 census 82% of the population were peasants, 4% was the working class, 1.5% were the middle classes, and 12.5% were the upper classes. The peasants were small farmers that used outdated methods. They were mostly former serfs that were freed in the 1861 serf emancipation under Alexander II.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following Russia’s failure in the Crimean War, Alexander II saw the need to usher his country into the modern world through drastic measures, thus leading to his great reforms. The most significance changes were made between the years 1861-1871, in particularly, the social, political and military aspect of Tsarist Russia. The reforms implemented by the Tsar can be seen as Russia striving to emerge as a superpower amongst the West. There is historical controversy as the sources suggest that Alexander II used the reforms to strengthen autocracy and secure his position as Tsar; modernisation was merely a consequence to the events that took place within his regime. The interpretation that Alexander II’s reforms were for the benefit of the people…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some may argue that Emancipation was an ultimately successful endeavour as it brought about both fundamental and necessary change, and whilst it is true that there were various factors that ensured the development of Russia from a backward thinking and archaic nation that relied very much on what was -in flourishing western countries – a repressive and outdated feudal system, the ill-considered and very evidently selfish way in which this much needed reform was executed meant that despite some factors, from which the development and modernisation of Russia’s class system itself were enabled, for Alexander II were exactly the opposite of what he had been attempting to achieve, in increasing his chances of retaining power by preventing revolution and furthering Russia’s position within the world. For this reason it is difficult to claim Emancipation was a success in terms of what the clearly power-conscious Tsar set out to accomplish, when many of its key aspects were redundant and others provided a catalyst for consideration of concepts of political activism or further revolution, an unwanted and unanticipated advancement,…

    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: Bernstein, Laurie, and Robert Weinberg. Revolutionary Russia: A History In Documents. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Alexander II became the Tsar, Russia was in total disarray. Her once widely respected and feared army was humiliated on the battlefields in the Crimean Peninsula, 80% of the people were in poverty and illiterate. Russia was still stuck in the middle ages while the rest of Europe was steaming in through the Industrial Era. Alexander II saw this as a need for change, primarily in response to the Crimean War, however to be able to do this, he also had to change the Russian society, therefore in 1861 he abolished serfdom, becoming the most significant events in Imperial Russian history, giving him the name as the ‘Tsar Liberator’ (Watts, Peter, History Review, 2014). However, although Alexander II’s reforms did pave the way for a more educated,…

    • 1434 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and contrast the social and economic policies of Alexander II (1855-81) and Alexander III (1881-94) of Russia.…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As a result of the emancipation, over 75% of Russian citizens were given the opportunity of freedom and in his honour a monument was created at National Assembly Square to show how grateful the people were for the freedom. Clearly at this point in time, many believed that their leader was a liberator for the steps he had taken towards giving them their rights. However longer term, the Serfs started to see the negative effects of the emancipation. Many of those that chose to accept freedom quickly became aware of…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays