Preview

The European Court of Justice and the Supremacy of Ec Law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6873 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The European Court of Justice and the Supremacy of Ec Law
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND
THE SUPREMACY OF EC LAW

I. INTRODUCTION

In the making and promulgation of Community law, the European Court of
Justice (ECJ) plays a crucial role. Many of the fundamental doctrines of EC law are not to be found in the Treaties, or secondary EC legislation, but in the case law of the European Court.

No provision of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) contains an express term regulating the issue of the supremacy between the Community and the various national laws of the Member States. The only implied reference to the issue of supremacy is Article 10[1] of the TEU which imposes a duty on all Member States to adopt appropriate measures to ensure that the obligations of the Treaty are observed, together with an additional duty to abstain from all acts which might jeopardise the achievement of the objectives of the Treaty.

Article 10 states that:

“Member States shall take all appropriate measures, whether general or particular, to ensure fulfillment of the obligations arising out of this Treaty or resulting from action taken by the institutions of the Community. They shall facilitate the achievement of the Community’s tasks.

They shall abstain from any measure which could jeopardise the attainment of the objectives of this Treaty.”.

Thus, the principle of the supremacy of Community law over national law was first established by the European Court of Justice whose role is explicitly stated in Article 220[2] of the TEU:

“The Court of Justice shall ensure that in the interpretation and application of this Treaty the law is observed.”

Prior to an analysis of the doctrine of supremacy and the relevant case law and implementation of the doctrine, an introduction into the composition, structure and practices of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) will be followed.

THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

• Composition and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    With reference to case-law, and to the current situation in at least two Member States, explain and critically analyse this statement. What implications would the Member States’ reluctance to incorporate the doctrine of supremacy into their constitutional orders have for the consistency and effectiveness of EU law?…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    European Court of Justice- is the highest court in the EU. The Court was established in 1952 and is based in Luxembourg. 1 judge from each member country. Court of first Instance. Court of Appeal. President is Vassilios Skouris since 2003.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    this essay I will attempt to examine and analyse the effectiveness of international courts and…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The primacy together with the principles of direct effect and of uniform applicability are believed to constitute not only the foundation of effectiveness of the Community legal order but also play the role of the pillars of the unofficial European Constitution.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Enforcement of Eu Law

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages

    To answer this question I will firstly explain how EU law became incorporated within the member states I will then explain the various types of EU legislation's in circulation. This is important to define as the various types of methods will involve different enforcement procedures. Finally I will explain how EU law is enforced and the ways EU law will effect the member state and individual businesses. I will summarise my findings at the end of the essay, this will give details of all the key ideas I have ut across.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To some extent the EU has become a superstate due to federalist features that combine the member states of the European Union closer together. For Eurosceptic British who oppose the further integration between the states have defined the EU’s superstate to be a huge, centralized Brussels Bureaucracy limiting the sovereign authority of member states. This can be controversial as those in favour of the EU would prefer to grant some powers to a central body as they can achieve benefits in return for example the single market.…

    • 2737 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Topic: The subsidiarity principal in the European UnionContent:1.Introduction2.The origins and first manifestations of the principal of subsidiarity in the EC3.The subsidiarity principle itself- The Treaties of Maastricht and Amsterdam4.Case law and the European Court of Justice4.1.The Tobacco Advertising Case4.2.The Working Time Directive5.Evolution of the Principle in recent years- From Amsterdam until today6.Conclusion1.IntroductionSubsidiarity can be defined as:"the principle that a central authority should have a subsidiary function, performing only those tasks which cannot be performed effectively at a more immediate or local level."Within the European Union, it is the fundamental principle for defining the border line between EU and member state responsibilities. The principle is incorporated in the treaty of Maastricht, signed on 7 February 1992, among other guidelines that discipline the different profiles of the European integration process.…

    • 4654 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The European Communities Act 1972 has been enacted by the parliament and it’s sought to bring a voluntary end to parliamentary sovereignty or at least render it as secondary. This has made the EU law a definitive supremacy as the parliament can’t make any laws that are in way of the current EU law. This is shown in the case of Costa , where the European Court of Justice shows supremacy over the member states. On the other hand the Factortame i case shows that the parliament still has control over its…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Free Movement of Goods

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages

    As the raison d 'etre of the common market, the free movement of goods may be regarded as a fundamental freedom common to all states holding membership of the European Community. The role of the European Court of Justice as a decision-maker is critical in maintaining and ensuring that free movement can prevail between the United States of Europe. Its effectiveness in this capacity is determined by the outcome of cases where member state legislation is put to the test in terms of whether or not it breaches EC legislation for freedom of movement.…

    • 2567 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The courts held that 'as Community law now stands, the Community has no competence to accede to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.' A lot of logics and reasons were given for this conclusion, the most important one included the fact that under Article 3(b) of the EC Treaty, the nation and the community is to act within the scope and the extension of its capacity as defined by the provisions of the Treaty and nothing else. Moreover, the judges decided to grant the ECHR special community relevant status in previous case law , so this would be the most they would carry on going without being proclaimed legally binding. Craig and De Burca also complained that the ECJ and ECtHR should classify themselves as two separate and different legal entities watching over certain rights that would be relevant to their jurisdiction.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    animal testing

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    c. The European Union shall act within the limits of the competences conferred upon it by the Member States in the Treaties. Competences not conferred upon the Union in the Treaties remain with the Member States.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will analyze one of the most fundamental rules of law in criminal law, the Principle of Legality under the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found in Article 7 ECHR. “Nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege” (“no crime without law, no punishment without law”- NCSL), is often referred to as the Principle of Legality in many legal contexts. It is considered a human right and also at the heart of many national criminal legal systems. It is a crucial element of legal defense to a criminal prosecution in which no crime or punishment can exist without a legal ground. It is a guarantee of human liberty; it ensures the fairness and transparency of the judicial authority and it protects individuals from state abuse and unjust treatment. The principle of legality (“nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege”) is found in Article 7 of the ECHR and this paper will also examine the way in which the ECHR has developed the Principle of Legality to encompass three overlapping mechanisms which are: “…only the law can define a crime and prescribe a penalty; the prohibition on retrospective criminal law and the prohibition on the imposition of harsher penalties”.…

    • 2876 Words
    • 83 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Nowhere in the Treaties themselves is there any reference to the supremacy of European Union law, or its hierarchy with the national law of the Member States. Instead, this principle has evolved from the case law of the European Court of Justice. The case of Costa v ENEL established supremacy of EU law, concerning a conflict between several Treaty provisions and an Italian statute, which nationalised the electricity company in Italy. Therefore, the ECJ holds a view that the creation was jurisprudential, with various Member States relating in different ways to the decision. This was also followed by Internationale Handelsgesellschaft, as mentioned below, which went further than Costa by stating that even secondary EU law, such as regulations, were a higher form of law than the specific constitutions of Member States. Although this would not affect the UK as currently there is no written constitution, it does have significant effect on most of the other EU Member States.…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The researcher gives emphasis on substantive law rules, doctrines, concepts and judicial pronouncements. He organizes his study around legal propositions and judicial pronouncements on the legal propositions of the Courts, and other conventional legal materials, such as parliamentary debates, revealing the legislative intent, policy and history of the rule or doctrine.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays