The Example Of Community Policing

The ideal idea of community policing is to bring law enforcement and the public it serves closer together to identify and address crime issues. But, it instead merely responds to emergency calls, and arresting criminals. I think that it is a relevant tool in society today, but only to an extent. We have officers out there day and night, protecting our streets and neighborhoods from burglary, theft, and robberies. Having Community Oriented Policing it not only helps the community, but it also helps the officer build that trust and it will, it could even be able to prevent any type of crime or even terrorist actions (Community-Oriented Policing (n.d.). After doing some more research outside of class on the background of COP and what its
This to me was something that struck me, this isn’t just based on the community in the officers, but it is something that expands even further than that. The usual role of the community and police is for example when something abnormal is happening the person in that area and our neighborhood calls the cops and reports it. A good example would be a group of men walking into an area such as apartments or a condo and they are having weird behavior (Community-Oriented Policing (n.d.). With everything going on in the news regarding police and any conduct in which they are involved in making it tough to call it. The way that people look at police officers now is that they’re the constant bad guy and they want to do nothing more than to just shoot us or beat us if we make a call or anything of the nature. I believe once we start to report the correct facts and information regarding these cases, then and only then we will have a better understanding. We as a community will want to reach out to the officers again and we will build a good sense of what it is to be a community. With the way the media portray everything it makes it difficult to really make a good judgement call as to If the COP is something that is really relevant or if it is
Furthermore, the exclusionary rule does prevent evidence which is gathered illegally to be used in any matter (How to Suppress Evidence - FindLaw. (n.d.). A good example of Find Law states, a murder weapon cannot be used at trial if police illegally searched a defendant’s home to recover it. The Exclusionary rule may also be triggered by police violations of the Fifth or Sixth Amendment (How to Suppress Evidence - FindLaw (n.d.). Under the Poisonous Tree Doctrine, any evidence or anything spoken could be eliminated from the case, specifically if there is an illegal search, which there is in the scenario we are writing about. All together, I think that there would be a twist in this and the suspect would be let go. The reason why would be the fact that the way the officers conducted, this would be wrong and they would be violating many rights of the person. The trial wouldn’t take long only because the evidence to all of this would most likely be thrown out on the count of the wrong doing of the officers. Unfortunately, this would be ashamed because there would have been compelling arguments if the search was done