Preview

The Exclusionary Under The Fourth Amendment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
459 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Exclusionary Under The Fourth Amendment
Yes, I believe the exclusionary rule is required under the Fourth Amendment.

“In all cases, the search must be conducted when there is probable cause. If an officer fails to execute a warrant before probable cause has dissipated, then any resulting search is violative of the Fourth Amendment, and the fruits thereof are subject to the exclusionary rule. This is true even if the search is conducted within the period of time set by law” (Hall, 2014, p. 411)

The Fourth Amendment, or the Bill of Rights for that matter, is only applicable to the government and not private citizens. The exclusionary rule would not have any merits if a private citizen went into someone’s home and found evidence of a crime while searching it so long as the private


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    case study

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Decision: The search was unreasonable under the 4th and 14th amendments. In arresting officer may search only the area “within the immediate control" of the person arrested, meaning the area from which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence. Any other search of the surrounding area requires a search warrant.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheetum Case Summary

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment is intended to protect the security a man relies upon when he places himself or his property within a constitutionally protected area, be it his home or his office,…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exclusionary rules are included in the Fourth Amendment which is to protect citizens from illegal searches and seizure. As such, it prohibits police officers to use evidence…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Therefore, the Exclusionary Rule and fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was created as an important protection of the Fourth Amendment. This paper has discussed the Exclusionary Rule, fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, and the difference between the two. It has also discussed the civil liability that officers may be subject to for their mistakes and how they may be forgiven from liability if their mistake was objectively reasonable or if it was made in good faith. Lastly, the author has discussed the importance of obtaining a search warrant when available and how this seemingly simple procedural step will prevent the suppression of evidence, as well as, protect the officer and agency against any civil liability. Although many times officers’ conduct searches under the emergency exception of the warrant requirement, it is generally a lackadaisical excuse which can hardly be defended. In modern times with the inception of recent technology it has become quicker and easier to obtain search warrants, either telephonically or by electronic means. Therefore, it should be instilled in officers through academic and field training to always secure consent or a search warrant prior to conducting a search in order to protect themselves and the integrity of the…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt201 Unit 1 Amendment

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4th Amendment - Prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause as determined by a neutral judge or magistrate…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “[t]he right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (U.S. Const. amend. IV). When the Fourth Amendment rights of citizens are violated, the criminal justice system enforces the exclusionary rule, which seeks to discourage law enforcement officers from using improper or illegal investigative procedures. In Mapp v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that the exclusionary rule was…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1980 a high school teacher at a high school in New Jersey caught two girls smoking in one of the bathrooms. At that time students were allowed to smoke in some areas of the school but smoking in the bathroom was restricted. The teacher then proceeded to take them to the office where they met with the Assistant Vice Principal Theodore Choplick. T.L.O was one of the girls, she was a 14 year old freshman. T.L.O said that she had not been smoking but the second girl admitted that she had been smoking. Choplick then took T.L.O into his office and told her to let him see her purse. He opened the purse and found a pack of cigarettes, a package of cigarette rolling papers, a small amount of marijuana, a pipe, and some empty plastic bags. He also found a list of people who owed T.L.O money. Also contained within the letters was information that showed that T.L.O was selling marijuana. Choplick then called T.L.O’s mother as well as the police. When they arrived at the school Choplick gave the police…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement personnel. (US Const. amend. IV) Though the Amendment “forbids unreasonable searches and seizures, it does not provide a mechanism for prevention or a remedy.” (Jackson, 1996) After passage of the Fourth Amendment, courts began to make laws regarding the rule against unreasonable searches and seizures. The courts designed a rule known as the Exclusionary Rule, which provided a remedy for the violation of a suspect’s Fourth Amendment privileges:…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects three distinct rights. They are liberty, property and privacy. Taking into consideration along with research and survey, I believe that each of these rights are equally important. Together they provide for a complete and well-rounded way of life. Without liberty, our lives would be limited to what the establishment would allow and therefore, what privacy could we have without the right of choice. Property would have no value without the liberty to use it as I desire.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exclusionary Rule

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Exclusionary Rule was designed to exclude evidence obtained in violation of a criminal defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizures by law enforcement personnel. If the search of a criminal suspect is searched unreasonable, the evidence obtained in the search will be excluded from trial.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects the people’s safety and rights. It protects people because if a person gets searched with probable cause, a warrant, etc. and the police finds a weapon the person was planning to use to hurt someone, the well-being of the people around has been protected. As long as there is probable cause or a warrant to search, physical apprehension is acceptable.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page

    The justices held that evidence seized on the basis of a mistakenly issued search warrant could be introduced at trial. The exclusionary rule, argued the majority, is not a right but a remedy justified by its ability to deter illegal police conduct. In Leon, the costs of the exclusionary rule outweighed the benefits. The exclusionary rule is costly to society: Guilty defendants go unpunished and people lose respect for the law. The benefits of the exclusionary rule are uncertain: The rule cannot deter police in a case like Leon, where they act in good faith on a warrant issued by a…

    • 229 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court has held that a search or seizure of a dwelling may be constitutionally defective if police officers enter without prior notice. The Amendment allows the subject of the warrant an opportunity to challenge the lawful authority of the warrant or to prevent its defective execution, such as when the wrong address is targeted or the subject no longer resides at the address. Section 213 of the Patriot Act permits federal law enforcement officials to delay giving notice of the execution of a search warrant to the subject of the warrant, even until after it has been executed, if notification may have an adverse result. This section amends the catchall provision adding a new subsection which provides that the requisite notice of the issuance of any warrant may be delayed if the court has reasonable cause to believe that the immediate notification of execution of the warrant will have an adverse effect. The warrant need only provide for giving notice within a reasonable period of its execution, and the period may be extended for good…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    IV Amendment

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Constitution, through the Fourth Amendment, protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Fourth Amendment, however, is not a guarantee against all searches and seizures, but only those that are deemed unreasonable under the law. Whether a particular type of search is considered reasonable in the eyes of the law, is determined by balancing two important interests. On one side of the scale is the intrusion on an individual's Fourth Amendment rights. On the other side of the scale are legitimate government interests, such as public safety.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures is probably one of the most vital components of criminal procedure. It regulates the State and Federal governments. All government agencies are regulated by this amendment, including but not limited to the Secret Service, I.R.S., F.D.A. as well as State revenue services, such as local law enforcement, county Sheriffs as well as local and county municipal services.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays