Preview

The Execution of King Charles 1

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Execution of King Charles 1
Cause and Effect Essay: The Execution of King Charles I

Similar to a recent promiscuous President of the United States, King Charles I was accused of dishonoring his political power and abusing his moral authority for personal satisfaction; however it is hard to imagine a modern leader being punished in the same way as King Charles I, who was sentenced to death by method of decapitation (Charles I, King. . . 147). Religion, money, a fierce trial, and the concept of absolute power were all contributing factors to the unfavorable verdict of King Charles I. Being convicted by the English Parliament subsequently led to the King 's violent execution in January of 1649 at Whitehall in England (Charles I: Regicide. . .29). The foremost cause of the execution of King Charles I was being convicted of treason by the English Parliament for deceiving his own people and tarnishing the ideal image of a king (Charles I: Regicide. . .29). People believed that the king should exhibit the utmost concern for the well-being of his people. Charles, on the other hand, was much more concerned with his own comforts and desires. The King 's attitude consequently led to his complete disregard of the rights of his people (29). Religious persecution was an undeniable contribution to the harsh sentencing of King Charles I. At one point in history, the King attempted to force his Episcopalian beliefs upon the Scots by implementing mandatory non-catholic scriptures in every service (United Kingdom). This infuriated the Scots, as well as most other Catholics in England; people began to flee the country in order to practice religion freely (Charles I, The Columbia Encyclopedia, 7803). Eventually, Charles and those who supported the Royalists went to war with the English Parliament. Even after losing a battle with the Parliamentary Forces in 1646 (which cost the English many casualties), the King refused to surrender. Some people believed that the royal defeat was a


Cited: "Charles I." The Columbia Encyclopedia. 6th ed. 2000: 7803. The Gale Group: Infotrac One File. Brown Lib., Virginia Western Comm. Coll., Roanoke, Va. 19 April 2005. "Charles I, King of England, Scotland, and Ireland (1600-1649)" The Harper Encyclopedia of Military Biography. 1992: 147. The Gale Group: Infotrac One File. Brown Lib., Virginia Western Comm. Coll., Roanoke, Va. 19 April 2005 "Charles I: Regicide and Republicanism" History Today. 1996: 29. The Gale Group: Infotrac One File. Brown Lib., Virginia Western Comm. Coll., Roanoke, Va. 19 April 2005 United Kingdom. History Learning Site. English Civil War. "Charles I" 19 April 2005
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To what extent do you believe with the view that it was Charles himself who caused the failures of the Personal Rule?
    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent do you believe with the view that it was Charles himself who caused the failures of the Personal Rule?

    When King Charles I dismissed Parliament in 1629, he was set on the idea of a personal rule without any help from Parliament. This he could manage, as long as he avoided war. His aim was to sort out the country's finances, and with the help of Strafford and Laud, impose a 'Policy of Thorough'. This policy was the idea of a fair and paternalistic government with no corruption. However, within 11 years, Charles' personal rule had failed and England was drifting into war. There are mixed opinions on whether this failure was solely due to the actions of the King, or those of third parties, for example, Strafford or Laud.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “Religion was more important than politics in the failure of King and Parliament to reach a settlement. 1646-1649”, Assess the validity of this statement.
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Religion was more important than politics in the failure of King and Parliament to reach a settlement. 1646-1649”, Assess the validity of this statement.

    In January 1649, King Charles I was executed after being charged with high treason due to political and religious reasons, some of which contributed to his refusal in accepting the peace settlements given to him by Parliament. Charles’ refusal to compromise was supported by the division that had emerged within Parliament on how to fight the civil war between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The main factors of the failure to reach a settlement were religion, politics, Charles’ intransigence, the New Model Army and the emergence of radical ideas; all of which eventually concluded to Charles’ execution.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    how far was buckingham influence on charles the main reason for personal rule
    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages

    how far was buckingham influence on charles the main reason for personal rule

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Far Was Charles Different from His Father in His Beliefs Character and Attitudes?
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Far Was Charles Different from His Father in His Beliefs Character and Attitudes?

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    King Charles I Research Paper
    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages

    King Charles I Research Paper

    Born in 1500, Charles I of Spain is the successor to the Habsburg dynasty ruled Austria and large parts of Europe during the Reformation as Emperor Charles V. On the side of his father, Philip of Burgundy, Maximilian Habsburg Austria Mary of Burgundy and. On the side of his mother, Joana "The Mad" of Castile, Ferdinand and Isabella's, who unified the crown of Aragon Spain and Castile. This made Charles the heir of many lands, which he started at the age of sixteen successor. Growing up in Burgundy in France, his first language is French and he was steeped in the foreign policy of political Burgundy. Adrian of Utrecht, who a short time would become pope in 1522 before he died a year later, as a member of his court. Between 1516 and the death of his father, Emperor in 1519, Charles inherited procedure duchies Austria, Carinthia, Moravia, Tyrol, and Styria; Netherlands along with France-Comte from…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of Eurasian Rulers
    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examples Of Eurasian Rulers

    Oliver Cromwell was a general for the Puritans during England's civil war. Cromwell captured Kin Charles for treason and had him executed. Cornwell now held power of England. He became a military dictator after ripping a constitution. Ireland then rebelled against him, so he sent an army to crush the rebels. 616,000 Irish died. After Cromwell's death the parliament appointed Charles II as ruler. Charles restored monarchy and brought back sports and theater.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Influence Of Charles's Personal Rule
    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Influence Of Charles's Personal Rule

    feelings to the Monarch in the courts but Charles had no interested in them so made the public…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Reign of Terror DBQ
    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Reign of Terror DBQ

    “The King’s blood flowed and cries of joy from eight thousand armed men struck my ears.” A man that witnessed the guillotining of King Louis XVI was left with this graphic image of a memorable event leading to the Reign of Terror. The Reign of Terror, otherwise known as the French Revolution, was an attempt to form a new government in France. The citizens of France fought against their government and made a new government led by Maximilen de Robespierre. This new government executed large numbers of individuals whom were “enemies” of the Revolution. This government went so far to preserve their vision of liberty and equality. France was violently demanding “Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity”. Was it necessary to murder 30,000 by guillotining them in the middle of town square for everyone to witness? Did the 2,750 people sentenced to death without any evidence deserve their fate? The Reign of Terror was not justified because of the reaction towards external threats, the treatment of internal threats, and the malevolent methods used by this new government to carry-out their vision of a perfect government.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    DBQ: Reign of Terror
    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DBQ: Reign of Terror

    “The execution of Louis XVI marked the beginning of the 18 month period of the French Revolution that has come to be called ‘The Reign of Terror’”(49). It was led by no other than Robespierre, in an attempt to start a new government, which proceeded to execute large numbers of people. The 18 months was a blood pouring event during the French Revolution. These events were unnecessary and the whole Reign of Terror was unjustified because it was a sin to kill, they went against what other through and what was right, and they went beyond what was necessary.…

    • 656 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Deposition Of Richard III Analysis
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Deposition Of Richard III Analysis

    In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Elizabethan Government
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Elizabethan Government

    Crime and punishment was dealt with harshly in the Elizabethan era. The Queen administered death sentences for high treason. "The most important courts were probably the Great Session (or Assizes), held twice a year in each county, and the Quarter Sessions Court, held four times a year (Thomas)." People were tortured for important information (Mahabal).…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crime In Elizabethan England
    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Crime In Elizabethan England

    They were normally punishable by death, usually by hanging, removal of the internal organs, beheading, or dismemberment. Treason was like committing a sin against God since the monarch was said to be God’s representative down on earth. The only hope someone convicted of murder or treason had was to beg for a royal pardon, which were rarely ever granted.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment In The Colonial Era
    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Capital Punishment In The Colonial Era

    During the late 1600s in Salem Village, Massachusetts, a strange hysteria took over the town as people began to be accused of witchcraft by a group of young girls. The girls started a paranoia that would eventually cause the execution of 19 “witches.” These witches were accused by the girls using spectral evidence, which are testimonies of dreams and visions. They were executed in public hangings between the years of 1692 and 1693. “The court later deemed the trials unlawful” because the type of evidence lead to the death of innocent people (“Salem Witch Trials,” 2001, para.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Three Executions
    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Three Executions

    An execution is the carrying out of a sentence of death on a condemned person; the killing of someone as a political act. Execution of criminals and political opponents has been used by nearly all societies—both to punish crime and to suppress political dissent. This paper examines three executions: the execution of Mary Queen of Scots in 1587, the execution of Joan of Arc in 1431, and the execution of John Wayne Gacy in 1994. In history books, all three executions represent the sentence of death on a condemned person. However, one difference is that the methods of execution, the public perception of execution, and requirements to earn a death sentence have changed dramatically from 1431 to 1994. Mary Queen of Scots was charged with “treason”…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Caused The English Civil War Essay
    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What Caused The English Civil War Essay

    They also wanted to take control of the army but of course Charles refused because the Parliament were just asking for too much but they took control of his army anyway! This was a long term problem because it shows that the Parliament didn’t listen to the king at all. The importance of this was quite important because even though the Parliament weren’t very helpful, they could have been during the eleven years’ time of Personal Rule. The Parliament set up a whole list of demands called the Grand Remonstrance which said what they should be in charge of such as how Charles’ children should be educated and that he had to call a Parliament at least every three years!…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics