Preview

The Existence Of Dichotomy In 'Shooting An Elephant'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
538 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Existence Of Dichotomy In 'Shooting An Elephant'
Choices are decisions people make every second of everyday. People have the choice of whom they accept as normal through comparisons of what they look like and also by their own behaviors. People who act and look like each other and with similar values often times are more likely to accept individuals of the same kind. Whether it is the difference between race, religion, or even political views, to tell an individual to accept everyone for their differences is merely impossible. Thus, the existence of dichotomy will always be.
People tend to choose their accepted social counterparts based on what they have in common with one another. For example, the Burmese villagers in, “Shooting an Elephant” viewed the foreigner as an outsider because
…show more content…

He wants nothing more than to be accepted by the villagers he lives amongst. Circumstances arise that cause him to feel overwhelming pressure to do something he feels is not right. However, he feels that in order to gain a little respect and be on better terms with the villagers, the foreigner feels he must do what the villagers expect to happen. The foreigner makes his final decision based off of the pressure he receives from the crowd of on looking villagers. However, only half of the Burmese in the village agrees that the choice he makes is morally right. Therefore, only half of the Burmese villagers side with the foreigner creating yet another perspective towards him.
The perspective on what tastes good and what doesn’t creates a powerful dichotomy that is applied towards food. Cultures prioritize certain types of food and tastes. For instance, Americans have dogs for pets and would think of it absurd to eat their pets for food. However, on the other hand, Indonesians view dogs as a means of food. Indonesians raise dogs the same way Americans raise cows and pigs. Neither culture is right nor wrong for each one has different perspectives on what is considered acceptable to eat and what is


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period after Orwell shot the elephant and when he wrote his essay upon the…

    • 520 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    You should always do what your conscience tells you to do. People always try and make decisions based on other people. In George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” essay Orwell did not want to shoot the elephant and knew it was not right, but did it just because of other people. If he would have trusted his conscience and had not shot the elephant he would never felt shameful.…

    • 81 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    While reading the essay Shooting an Elephant, first published in 1936 by Eric Blair under the pen name of George Orwell, one gets captivated by the intricate web of rhetoric that Blair weaves throughout the piece.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    George Orwell is well known, even though he died in 1950. He was British and an ex-cop. George Orwell is a very prominent author. He is known for a few of his books, written for a variety of purposes. However, this specific essay, “Shooting an Elephant”, is written to inform of us. He phrases this essay more as a narrative, which makes it not rhetorically effective. George Orwell uses great imagery and his syntax makes it simple for even high schoolers to read through his works.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The thesis of George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” is, “When the white man turns tyrant it is his own freedom that he destroys.” This sentence is found in paragraph 7, line 14. This is the thesis of the essay because it reflects on the fact that Orwell feels reluctant at first to shoot the elephant, because he sees how peaceful and harmless it is. But as the crowd behind him pressures him with their laughter and screams, he finally pulls the trigger, with out actually thinking, and he repeatedly shoots the elephant trying to kill it, in mad rampage. This scene reflects back to the part of the thesis, “it is his own freedom he destroys” because Orwell demonstrates losing his freedom to behave intelligently and morally. He doesn’t want to kill…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever wondered where your food comes from? The Omnivore’s Dilemma, written by Michael Pollan, digs deeper into this question. He explains the different food chains and argues that some are more wholesome and healthy than others. In this way, he solves “the omnivore’s dilemma”; when people can eat everything, what should they eat? Pollan proves that guidance is necessary in order to improve people’s eating habits by writing about healthful food choices from the past, how our senses are fooling us to make the wrong food choices, and how culture impacts the food on everyone’s plates.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In "Shooting an Elephant" The main characters biggest conflict was to shoot an elephant. This was something he did not and typically under the circumstances would not have done, but felt compelled and pressured to do so. If it weren't for the watching Indians this story may have turned out differently. He felt as if he had to do it, cause by not doing it would have been like him demonstrating his and his native country weakness. Being in a county that his native land had a lot of imperial influence, he could not let this happen.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1936, author George Orwell wrote an essay titled “Shooting an Elephant”. In the essay Orwell describes a scene of a British police officer who is stuck between having to shoot an elephant. The story takes place in Burma, India where then, they were under British imperialism. Imperialism is a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force. It humiliates the occupied people, reducing them to an inferior status in their own country. Analyzing Orwell’s work, I realize that Orwell feels Imperialism is not good for both the people subject to and the people of the imperial power. The fact that the main character of the story is an officer of the imperial government, but also in opposition to imperialism…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How each person views and behaves towards race is constructed through personal experience, institutions they take part in and cultural conditions. These different levels are intertwined, and the beliefs they…

    • 1943 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shooting An Elephant

    • 2676 Words
    • 11 Pages

    * George Orwell wrote this essay when England ruled Burma as a colony---much like it had ruled America during the colonial period. Colonialism occurred when many European nations simply took over countries because they believed their culture was superior to the native culture. The ideas of social darwinism, or survival of the strongest nations and/or people, played a large role in the domination and subjection of countries in Southeast Asia and Africa. So, what your teacher wants to you mention is how Orwell felt about being put in charge of this native population which does not like him or the country he represents. If you look at the first line of the essay, Orwell says this was the only times he was " important enough to be hated" so much. As you read further, you will find other examples of Orwell's dislike of colonialism, especially during his decision about whether or not to shoot the elephant.…

    • 2676 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People may view others as warm and inviting, or cold and distant, based on where they are from…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shooting an Elephant

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the biggest issues in governments is corruption. Corruption however, is an issue created by the individuals through how they choose to use their power, whether it is for the good of everyone or not. The struggle with doing what is right, and what people in power tell you to do, is one of the biggest elements in George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant.” The true story tells about George’s experiences policing during the British occupation of India with a rogue elephant and him killing it. Orwell uses detailed diction and imagery to paint the experience and use the image of the elephant as a symbol for the British Empire, and the need for the Barman citizens to remove their imperialistic oppressor.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way that we are naturally introduced to World we never constructed embraces the pre-determinacy of our social characters' shapes, and being to some degree wild. Specialists have closed after the nature-sustain debate that noticeable determinants in molding the social character are both hereditary and…

    • 46 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As a child, a person’s understanding on what culture similarities and differences are solely depends on his/hers family, friends, peers, literature, media, and etc. Learning to embrace diversity is hard but not impossible; in every society there are always difficulties in accepting other groups of people that don’t comply with the existent group’s way of life, and this is when the ability to accept and embrace play a role. Having the knowledge on how to perceive situations and surroundings is ones defensive mechanism that allows a person to know what to do in a certain situation. When faced with the unexpected, this knowledge based perception becomes what is known as bias.…

    • 3418 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethnocentrism

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On this earth, there are billions of people and we are separated by borders, oceans and vast masses of land. We are placed into groups based on our nationality, religion, race, class and even age but at the end of the day we are very much alike. Humans are all the same before birth and again the same after birth. What distinguishes us from each other are our qualities both internal and external ones. These differences among us lead to diversity and if not mistreated can bring about benefits to an individual such as better critical thinking and a broader perspective of the world. Nonetheless, this diversity can lead to discrimination, stereotype and even phobias.…

    • 756 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays