Preview

The Failure Of Into Thin Air By Jon Krakauer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
843 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Failure Of Into Thin Air By Jon Krakauer
In the past, many books have been written about the treacherous climb of mount Everest. One of the most well known stories documented on the climb was Into Thin Air, written by Jon Krakauer in 1997. The book is based off of the disaster on Everest in 1996, which became one of the most dangerous Everest expeditions of all time. At severe chilling climate, and extremely low amounts of oxygen, climbers of the 1996 Everest expedition were forced to make moral decisions, in which they must choose to save themselves, or choose to save others. Most climbers have tons of experience when it comes to climbs mountains. People such as Ian Woodall, and Lopsang Jangbu had to put their lives at risk during the expedition to choose to be either selfish, or …show more content…
Lopsang was a Nepalese Sherpa mountaineering guide, climber and porter. He was a Sherpa on the 1996 Everest expedition, and was part of Scott Fischer's team. Lopsang has plenty of experience on mountain climbing, considering that he has summited Everest four times. During the Everest climb in 1996, Lopsang portrayed many acts of selflessness, meaning he decided to help other members on his team when they got into life threatening situations. One example of Lopsang demonstrating selflessness during the climb was when he helped Sandy Pittman up the mountain. Sandy doesn’t have much climbing experience, so Lopsang decided to help her get up the mountain safely. Another example of Lopsang showing a selfless personality was the way he acted towards Scott Fischer. Lopsang was always looking out for Scott during the climb, especially when Scott was in trouble. This was extremely important because Scott was one of the best leader on the expedition considering that he was an experienced climber, and he knew what to do when things got hairy. I think Lopsang made a good choice on deciding to be selfless because as much as you want to get home alive, other climbers also want to get home to their families, and be known as the guy who summited …show more content…
Ian Woodall and Lopsang Jangbu both made opposite choices on choosing to be selfish, or selfless. If I was to pick one of these people to guide me to the top of Everest, I would choose Lopsang. I feel like this would be the better choice out of the two because if something went wrong, I would always have someone to rely on for help. Lopsang also had way more climbing experience than Ian, and would have a better understanding of how to reach success while climbing. I believe that Ian Woodall made a bad choice on being selfish because he didn’t really help others reach the summit, but rather helped himself. Having a selfless personality gains you a substantial amount of trust from others, and makes other people around you more confident for success. Therefore, if I was put in a situation like Lopsang or Ian, I would choose to be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The postcard in the beginning of the chapter causes the reader to wonder what led Chris to take a dangerous journey and if it did prove fatal. “It might be a very long time before I return South. If this adventure proves fatal and you don’t hear from me again…” (qtd in Krakauer 3)…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into The Wild Summary

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jon Krakauer, born in 1954, was introduced to mountaineering by his father at the young age of eight. Following his graduation from Hampshire College in 1976, Krakauer worked as a carpenter and commercial salmon fisherman to support himself. However, for the following two decades, Krakauer's life was dedicated to the serene yet thrillful ‘sport' of mountain climbing. In 1996, just four years after the death of Chris McCandless, Krakauer climbed Mt. Everest. However, a disastrous storm took the lives of many, including four out of the five teammates who summited with him. Krakauer's background as an investigative journalism combined with his skills as a born writer makes him an interesting writer. His work shows the tenacity of a journalist…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dams and levees weren’t enough to protect the 1,836 people who died in Hurricane Katrina, and yet officials relied yet again on these devices against Hurricane Harvey 12 years later. Years have passed, and still so-called “experts” believe that because the circumstances may have been slightly different than before, they had the upper hand against nature. Various natural disasters have proven again and again that no human has power over the environment, and again and again these lapses in judgement end in fatalities. In Jon Krakauer’s Into Thin Air, the word powerless demonstrates the idea that the driving power in the expedition does not reside with the team, but with nature and their surroundings. This concept should not only be applied to…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Into Thin Air by Jon Krakaeur, the author’s word choice of descriptive passages and vivid words help well understand his perspective. You see this whole story is written in perspective Jon Krakauer is a journalist by trade, and his motive for going on the Everest expedition is to write an article about the experience of climbing as part of a commercial expedition. The perspective is in the first person, but with a journalistic viewpoint. Krakauer often seems removed from the subject, describing events as objectively as possible, as one would expect in a journalistic article. For example, he is sometimes critical of his fellow climbers, even though elsewhere he describes…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    altitudes such as Everest. He was very honest and admitted when he made a mistake. Krakauer struggled climbing and faced many challenges once the storm arrived. I honestly do not think he was trained enough to be climbing Mt. Everest. As an author, he was very detailed and made sure he knew all the facts about the people in the novel. He was also very sympathetic and told about all the guilt he had from the expedition. Krakauer writes, “My actions or failure to act played a direct role in the death of Andy Harris.” (Krakauer 284). He is a very professional writer and really makes you feel a part of the story. His wording was impeccable and I feel like he did not leave out any details. I loved how he was a very honest person while writing which made me have a lot of respect towards him. I relate to his honesty and bluntness. I personally am a blunt person when it comes to telling the truth. I tell it how it is even if it is not the right way to say it. For Krakauer to be able to write this novel after all the stuff he experienced in this disaster is unbelievable. He witnessed some very tragic things and for him to sit down and write it all out shows how determined he was to get the truth out. I honestly believe that he told his part of the story to the best of his ability. I do not think that he could have made it up. He also knew that the other survivors would read this book and would know if he did not tell the story correctly. Since he seemed very loyal I do not think he would have tried to make himself seem different than his real self. If he had in anyway tried to claim that he had no regrets about the expedition and what happened then I would be hesitant of the type of…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jon Krakauer's Analysis

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    wife, Marcia, “long after falling in love with Billie, long after she gave birth to Chris” (Krakauer 121) before moving away from El Segundo.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into Thin Air is the book about the Mt. Everest disaster, the main character and narrator John Krakauer gets invited to come with Rob Hall’s expedition team, little did he know what he was getting him self into. The reader does not see alienation until almost the end of the book. Krakauer makes it to the top of the summit, keep in mind that he is the first one to reach the summit. Krakauer gets back to a camp before the nightfall, but other climbers were still up toward the summit or making the trek back to camp. Throughout the night is when the worst of the storm hits, when morning hits Krakauer finds himself all alone. Krakauer is almost non-existent in the rescue efforts, which affects his public image after the expedition comes…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The definition of selfless is “concerned with more of the needs and wishes of others than with one’s own, unselfish (google).” This is what Chris McCandless’s life consisted of, many individuals disagreed with Krakauer about Chris being selfless. Chris began an adventurous journey heading to the Alaskan wilderness, throughout his journey he stumbles upon numerous encounters. Encounters between meeting new people, place to place, and exploring more of the world, what was known to Chris McCandless as outstanding. “Happiness is only real when shared” (Krakauer 189), Chris learned this a little too late for his tremendous adventures.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1996 Mt. Everest Disaster

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1996, a number of expedition teams ascended Mount Everest. During May, a storm hit Everest, causing lives to be lost. This event is now known as the 1996 Mount Everest disaster, and it brought changes to mountain climbing. Numerous individuals wrote about the events that occurred during this climb. Among these individuals was Jon Krakauer, a writer and member of Rob Hall’s expedition team, who provided his account of the events in his book Into Thin Air: A Personal Account of the Mt. Everest Disaster. Krakauer’s book was met with criticism from other climbers and mountaineers. His credibility was questioned as well because of the effects that high altitudes have on the human body.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Into Thin Air

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the personal account novel Into Thin Air by Jon Krakauer, there are fierce qualities which has mainly transformed from whole climbers’ satisfactory. Loyalty and teamwork invent whole members on Everest to experience hardships. In spite of inexperienced clients’ limitation, guides keep on pushing themselves to achieve their purpose. Due to all members in this expedition participate with their full of passion and determination, guides reveals arrogance, even over clients’ limitation. Moreover, Hall’s knowledge about media players such as Jon Krakauer and Sandy Pittman cause lethal events.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    James Rachels

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages

    James Rachels argues against theories of selfishness that the psychological egoists maintain. He challenges the view that everyone always does what he or she wants by showing that we often dounpleasant tasks for the future pleasures or from obligation. Altruism is recognized as not acting in self interest. He also clears up the confusions that selfishness and self interest share the same meaning. *Psychological egoists argue that we always do what we want to do. Rachel says that is questionable and there are two classes of actions that are exceptions to the generalization. One is a set of actions we do not want to do but we do as a means toan end we want to achieve. For example, going to the dentist to fix a toothache or going to work everyday to get paid at the end of the month. The other set of actions are those which we do, not because we want to or because there is an end to achieve but because we feel obligation to do them. Rachel states for example, someone may do something because he or she has promised to do it and thus feels obligated, even though he or she does not want to do it. The second statement psychological egoists argue is that, to do what one wants to do is acting selfishly, therefore we always act selfishly. Rachels states this example, Smith wants to do something that will help his friend even if it means putting on hold his own enjoyments, and Rachel says that is what makes Smith unselfish. Rachel says the mere fact that I am acting on my wants does not mean I am acting selfishly; that depends on what it is that I want. If I want only my own good, and care nothing for others, then I am selfish; but if I also want to help other people, and if I act on that desire, then m y actions are not selfish.*The psychological egoism stance can ask then why Smith gets satisfaction from helping hisfriend and the answer is because he is selfish. But actually if we have a positive attitude towards reaching a goal, we get satisfaction from reaching the goal.…

    • 745 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Altruism is the opposite of egoism. Individuals who perform helpful acts for others do so purely for genuine concern and/or to increase the welfare of others (Fiske, 2012, pg. 347). People who perform altruism acts feel empathy, concern, and/or sympathy for another. People who act in an altruistic way see the world as benevolent (Fiske, 2012, pg. 347).…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egoism and Altruism

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages

    From my understanding is that nothing is done with out self-interested applied. So my example is harder to come up with now but I will give it a shoot. A boy is walking down the street and sees a group of boy in a circle. As he is getting closer to them he hears a dog yelping. He discovers the boys and kicking the small dog. He stops watches for a minute and decides to do something about it. He says something to the other boys which results are him getting beat up and then broken up with a neighbor yells she is calling the police. The boys being to scatter leaving the injured boy and dog behind. This boy was acting like characteristic of Altruism sacrificing himself for a defenseless animal. The virtue of bravery ,courage and compassion was what the boy was using to try to protect this dog. He was being selfish in the sense he was not looking out for his own self interest.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At stage two the individual is focused on satisfying ones interest but mores into considering the interest of other in stage three. Their goal of climbing the pass was important to him since he had previously failed because of pulmonary edema. He felt that he had satisfied his moral obligation with leaving the sadhu with the Stephen. Stephen tried to get the Japanese group to lend their horse to carry the sadhu down to the hut and he asked Passang to have him carried down but he could not allow the porters to use their energy because they needed it to get to the summit. Passang advised Stephen to not delay any longer and Stephen gave into the pressure of group ethics and ended at stage 3 fairness to the sadhu. He was hopeful that later climbers would come to the aid of the sadhu. That shows the bystander effect that someone else will do what we can’t. The bystander effect affected all the climbers. All of them assumed that the next group of climbers would help the sadhu…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, Rachels avers that by the fact that Smith decides not to go on a trip, just to stay behind and assist his sick friend, it means that he was not pushed by his personal interests in the concerned events. Had he been actuated and significantly influenced by self-directed motives, as expounded by the psychological egoism theory, it is obvious that Smith would have gone for the trip as opposed to aiding and abetting the sick friend. In this regard, James Rachels asserts that the position that all human actions and undertakings are self-motivated is not true due to the fact that some of them are based on voluntary acts. In Smith’s case, he volunteered to forgo the trip, just to attend to his best friend. Smith’s example indicates that people always do what they most want to do which refute the psychological…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays