Preview

The Failure Of The Provisional Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
152 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Failure Of The Provisional Government
The months of June and July of 1917 were marked by instability and turmoil. The February Revolution’s effects were still being felt throughout Russia, and various factions rushed to fill the political vacuum created by Tsar Nicholas II’s removal. The Provisional Government, established by the Duma immediately following the February Revolution, managed to function as Russia’s governing body despite constant challenges to its authority from all sides of the political spectrum. As the Provisional Government retained control, the local and regional Soviets, comprised mostly of workers, peasants, and soldiers, continued to grow in popularity as a means for Russia’s historically underrepresented majority to have their views heard. The relationship
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain why opposition to Russian Governments was so rarely successful throughout the period 1855-1964
    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Explain why opposition to Russian Governments was so rarely successful throughout the period 1855-1964

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why do some historians believe the Provisional Government was doomed from the beginning?
    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why do some historians believe the Provisional Government was doomed from the beginning?

    Historians may believe the Provisional Government was doomed because of a major problem with the provisional government which was the Dual Authority. The Provisional Government was made up of members of the old Duma that had refused to disband at the Tsars command. This meant that they were basically the same men that the Tsar had appointed before the revolution, so nothing had changed in that regard. Consequently, they had no goodwill from the public backing them up, so they would be judged purely on what the public could see happening. Furthermore, the Government had to share power with the Petrograd Soviet. This illegitimate relationship lessened the power of the Provisional Government existentially. Incidentally, it should be mentioned that the two factions were not necessarily hostile towards one another from the start, with some members being members of both groups at the same time. This combination of convenience however, could not last for long.Without a shred of a doubt, one of the biggest problems with the Provisional Government was the continuation of the war. The war was a lost cause by this stage and the Provisional Government would have wanted to pull out if it were a logical possibility, but in order to keep Russia afloat they needed to keep up the fight for the money that they were receiving from Britain and France. The loans that Russia had taken out from these countries while under the Tsarist regime had left Russia financially destroyed. The injections of money and supplies that the allies were providing Russia with because of their involvement in the war was the only thing keeping Russia stable. If Russia could have started to engage in peace talks, as suggested by Josef Stalin, then the Provisional Government could concentrate on sorting out the social and economic problems properly, but because of the desperate need for the war credits, this was not a viable solution. The effect of this choice to keep fighting is somewhat akin to watching a…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Who Was The Most Successful Russian Rulers From 1856-1964
    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Who Was The Most Successful Russian Rulers From 1856-1964

    The reforms and policies made during the last Tsarist years were not in the interests of the people but were made simply to maintain the power of the Tsar and his nobles. Most people would argue that during the years 1917-1964 there was more political freedom and less repression than in the Tsarist years. The provisional government did not meet the needs of the Russian people. They were an unstable and temporary government, and many people on the furthest parts of the Russian empire did not know about their existence. This provided them with many issues, such as trying to enforce democracy onto people they did not understand what democracy actually was. Many historians believe that at this point the people of Russia did not know themselves what form of government they wanted and due to the lack of education they did not know what form was best for them. In October 1917 came the Bolshevik revolutions. With their leader, Lenin, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and came into power. The leadership of Lenin was met with great approval from the people. Lenin promised political freedom unknown to them under the Tsars and Provisional government. In his rule…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881–1905?
    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881–1905?

    The question is focused on the challenges mounted to Tsarist rule in the given period, and the extent to which divisions among opposition groups contributed to their failure. Answers may consider the four main strands of opposition, their internal divisions and their intolerance of each other. A tradition of revolutionary activity was established by the Populists and their appeal to the peasants, though they were weakened by the assassination of Alexander II and the repression established by Alexander III. The Social Revolutionaries tried to gain support among both peasants and townspeople, but were divided between anarchists and revolutionaries. The Social Democrats split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks at the 1903 Congress, while the Liberals did not establish distinctive parties until after the 1905 Revolution. A simple description of some of the revolutionary parties will be marked within Levels 1 and 2, and progression will depend on the range and depth of relevant material.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917
    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Vladimir Lenin's Consolidation Of Power In 1917

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Their Own Downfall?
    • 1254 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Far Was the Provisional Government Responsible for Their Own Downfall?

    The Provisional Government was largely responsible for its downfall in 1917 for a number of reasons. Firstly, it could be argued that the Provisional Government was doomed to fall due to the nature of its existence. In the first Provisional Government led by Prince Lvov, it became apparent that it lacked legitimate authority because it was not an elected body. The Provisional Government was made up of former Duma members who had refused to disband at the Tsar’s demand. As such, they had no legitimate claim to the loyalty and obedience of the Russian people, which was a weakness that was contributory to its downfall in 1917.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall
    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How far was the Provisional Government responsible for its own downfall

    To a large extent I believe that the provisional government was responsible for its own downfall due to the fact that they had to share power with the soviets and their perilous decision to continue fighting in the First World War. Their decision to carry on fighting in the war was the most important due to lost support from the Russian people and more importantly, from the armed forces who they relied on to defend them. There are also other factors which contributed to the provisional government’s downfall such as the return of Lenin and the Kornilov affair which led to the success and rise of the Bolsheviks.…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why was the Bolshevik take over in Octo
    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why was the Bolshevik take over in Octo

    Furthermore, the Bolsheviks had no figure of leadership in Russia – Lenin had been exiled to Switzerland. Consequently, until Lenin’s return in April, the Bolsheviks were left to decide what the best decisions to make for the party were; they began to support the Provisional Government, believing the Marxist’s plan of achieving a Socialist community was being fulfilled. However, when Lenin returned to Russia, April 3rd 1917, he degraded the Provisional Government and the idea of supporting them, insisting that all power goes towards the Soviet. Lenin’s sudden change in Bolshevik ideals unsettled the party and it took time to resolve the drastic change. This move made the Bolsheviks legitimacy questionable due to the abrupt change in Bolshevik ideals.…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Whitlam Government
    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Whitlam Government

    The Whitlam Government (1972 – 1975) introduced many ideas that impacted on all the people of Australia. There may have been impediments that prevented the Whitlam Government from introducing new ideas, such as the Senate. Nevertheless in three years the Whitlam Government managed to win the hearts of many Australians. In their three year reign the Whitlam Government managed to create Medibank, establish firm relations with People's Republic of China, establish the Department of Aboriginal Affairs (Giving all Aboriginals a ‘voice'), obtained responsibility for tertiary education over from the states and eradicated tertiary fees, and establishing Supporting Mother's Benefit's. These were only a few of their achievements.…

    • 2370 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Articles of Confederation : an Ineffective Government
    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Articles of Confederation : an Ineffective Government

    Whoever said that the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an effective government was completely incorrect. The United States were not united under this government. The United States could not stand up for itself against other countries. Also, the United States were not stable economically under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation did not provide a good government for America.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Research Paper
    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Joseph Stalin Research Paper

    Let’s talk a little but about how Russia was before Stalin came into power and changed up the whole game for Russia. As soon as the Czar of Russia (Nicholas II) was kicked off his throne, Russia’s peasant population came strong and in numbers. These peasants all set up something that was called the Provisional Government. The Provisional Government was formed in Petrograd, and was led first by Prince Georgy L'vov and then by socialist Alexander Kerensky, a prominent…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Birth of the Republic
    • 1232 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Birth of the Republic

    During the Seven Year War against France, England encountered many expenses which lead to the nation falling into a great debt. This debt created many issues between the British government and its people. England's people felt as if the King was trying to rule over them and not take their own personal beliefs into consideration. The government tried to resolve the issues of their debt by creating new acts that would hopefully pay for the war expenses, the new territory of Canada and Mississippi, and its troops to defend as well as take care of their new land.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Royal Romanov Family
    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Royal Romanov Family

    The Liberals were not successful in gaining governmental acceptance of their ideas. However, when the Revolution was reignited in 1917, the Revolutionaries had more support and the determination to accomplish their goals. During this time, because of World War I, there was hardly any food or fuel, and hard winters made for hard times. Nicholas II then attempted to appease the people with the introduction of a Constitution and the Duma, a parliament which would give the people more of a say in government, but it was too little and too late. The mounting pressures of World War I, combined with years of injustice, toppled the rule of Tsar Nicholas II in March 1917. Forced to abdicate, he was replaced by a Provisional Government committed to continuing the…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Did the Bolsheviks Succeed in 1917? Essay Example
    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why Did the Bolsheviks Succeed in 1917? Essay Example

    After the abdication of the Tsar, it was decided that the Russian people should democratically elect a new Constituent Assembly. Until an election could be organised, the Provisional Government, made up partly of ex-Duma members, was placed in control of Russia.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Bolshevik Takeover
    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Bolshevik Takeover

    In March of 1917 in Russia, The Tsar, Nicholas II had little choice. The Great War (as it was known as at that time) had turned into a disaster, conditions at home were horrible, and the Menshevik government had forced Nicholas to abdicate He did this for himself and his son and gave the power to his brother. His brother gave up the power the next day because the country was in such disarray. After that, the Provisional Government took power. By November of 1917 in Russia, the Provisional Government was in complete collapse. In the meantime, the Bolshevik party, which was helped by German money, had built up an efficient party organisation, had a brilliant propaganda machine, and a powerful private army know as the Red Guards.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics