Preview

THE FAULT IN OUR STARS

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
THE FAULT IN OUR STARS
Who would have thought that a book about cancer kids would go on to become so popular?
Written by John Green, the book feels unflinchingly honest without being gruelling, and has buckets of humour and romance.
When popular books get adapted, there’s always the fear that you’re about to watch your favourite story get brutally cannibalised in front of a global audience of millions.
But The Fault In Our Stars has been giving nothing but positive vibes to its fans, with the trailer being one of the most liked videos on YouTube. So how does the film measure up to the book?
A lot of the dialogue is lifted word-for-word from the novel
Firstly, I’m not sure if I’ve ever seen a more faithful book-to-film adaptation. A lot of the dialogue is lifted word-for-word from the book, and some of Hazel’s narration is transferred into a voiceover so that her inner voice and observations about cancer aren’t lost.
The dialogue that isn’t directly taken from the book remains true to the characters and authentically teenage – perhaps even more so than the book.
Some story is trimmed and condensed, but hardly anything is cut altogether. Of all the characters, Isaac suffers the most, although, on the whole, the cuts benefit the film.
Isaac’s story is a little more light-hearted in the film than in the book, presumably because the filmmakers didn’t want the audience thinking too much about the awful reality of going blind.
The film opts instead to focus almost entirely on the love story, which is not only understandable but sensible.
The cast are great across the board. Nat Wolff brings much-needed humour as Isaac. Laura Dern and Sam Trammell do good work as Hazel’s parents, roles that are reined in slightly from the books.
Willem Dafoe is spot-on as the unrepentantly awful Peter Van Houten, thankfully denied any sort of schmaltzy redemption during the translation to film.
Ansel Elgort and Shailene Woodley play the star-crossed lovers
The film rests on the shoulders of Ansel Elgort and –

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thomas C. Foster indicates in “How to Read Literature Like a Professor” that usually when a blind person shows up in a piece of literature, he can see into the spirit and divine world, and can see things that the hero of the story is unable to see. While I don’t believe love is spiritual, I do believe that it takes a special eye to see it. In “The Fault in Our Stars” by John Green, Augustus’ best friend Isaac is losing his eyesight to cancer, and essentially going blind. Even though Isaac is losing his eyesight, he is still able to see and understand the complex relationship that Hazel and Augustus share with one another, and he can clearly see the enormous amounts of love that they have for each other just by being with them. I feel that Isaac…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A few things that I really like about this novel that I really like are that the author writes with a…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yet in the book things go a little bit different. For example the fishing trip, in the film this is an event for the patients yet in the book McMurphy high jacked the bus and took the men fishing. This gives an entirely different…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The book is amazing, but it is lacking in the use of descriptive words. It seems dull in some points of this book. It is all around a good book in many other ways though. It shows Cole's…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the movie, some of the characters differentiate from the book. For example, in the movie Daisy admits her love for…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Book to movie adaptations are very common to find now of days. Some examples are: Hunger Games, Divergent, Paper Town, ect. All book to movie adaptations have many differences, but also many similarities. One of the popular book to movie adaptation is Divergent by Veronica Roth. As Divergent started to climb to the best sellers list, the possibility for a movie was almost undeniable. Soon enough a movie was announced, and sold out box offices all over the world. There were many similarities, and many differences in this book to movie adaptation.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ransom Of Red Chief

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page

    I enjoyed this book and liked the movie and the book both.they both were a lot alike and I didn't realy notice the difference untll I looked harder.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking for Alibrandi

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some of the characters in the film are how they are portrayed in the book, whereas many are quite different. In the book Ivy Lloyd (Poison Ivy) is Josie’s arch enemy and Carly is just someone who is mentioned in chapter 8, whereas in the movie Ivy and Carly have been blended into the same character. The fights between Josie and Ivy have been omitted and they don’t reconcile their differences at the end. Also in the book Josie has three friends, Anna, Sera and Lee but in the movie Lee has been blended into both Sera and Anna. In the book Lee has a different point of view and brings more to the group of friends. Other characters such as Josie (Pia Miranda), John Barton (Matthew Newton) and Michael Andretti (Anthony LaPaglia) are well casted in these roles for the movie because they looked like they were described in the book. Christina, Josie’s mum, looked too much like Marcus Stanford in the movie and in the book was described to look more Italian. All in all the characters in the movie were very good interpretations of the characters in the book.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is concrete proof that an adaptation to a book can often become something hideous, just like in The Most Dangerous Game. If someone wants to make a good adaptation, many things should be taken into consideration. Some of these are: hire good actors, stick to the story, and don’t overdo the drama. Many directors are able to pull off adaptations. This original short novel was great, with lots of action and mystery. Then came along a few overconfident souls who decided they were good enough to remake Richard Connell’s…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They both are similar ,because they both talk about the same people and tell the same story.The book has several differences than the movie like dally dying instantly after being shot by the fuzz ,Johnny’s mom yelling at pony and two-bit those are just a couple of differences in the two there are several more though.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some actors acted and appeared entirely different in the movie than the book. The directing and special effects were okay in some scenes, but half-baked and lousy in others. Furthermore, the characters are developed far less in the film and many semi-important scenes in the novel are excluded in the film. Do not watch this movie unless you have read the novel (or even if you have read it). If you haven’t read the book and decide to watch the movie instead, you will fail to understand the complicated relationships between each character and between the Socs and Greasers and just think the movie is substandard and all aspects of the movie lacked in action, emotion, or just seemed like they were not well thought out. A 3.5/10 may seem harsh, but I was not pleased. Just go read the book instead. It had the potential to be a great film, but severely missed the…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Myrtle- I don't feel as if the actor of Karen Black did a great job or a terrible job in the attempt of the Fitzgerald portrayal. In the movie, she seems more of a crazy, and physco lady rather than an intimate and luring woman. Such as when she ate the blood off of her bloody hand in the move of The Great…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that the author, Dee Henderson, wrote this book very well. Henderson has an amazing way of showing the emotion f the characters she is portraying on her writings. I feel as though Henderson has a way of writing that warms your heart, making it seem like you are in…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Yellow Wallpaper

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The narrative point of view clearly differs between the story and the film. The original text is expressed through the first person point of view. While reading the short story there is a sense that charlotte is speaking directly to the reader, leading to a complete understanding of her thoughts and actions. There is a more focused look into the main character. The other characters in the story are simply mentioned through charlottes own thoughts. The film however, is scripted through the third person point of view. The viewer receives a general knowledge on all characters. Unlike the short story, the viewer is not able to get into charlottes mind. This is just one example of the distinct differences between the story and film.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Conspirator

    • 677 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Probably the most significant thing about this film is its cast. Robin Wright is wonderful in a very nicely observed performance as Surratt. It's a shame she's not given higher regard as an actress because she has a lot of talent. James McAvoy is also quite strong as her lawyer Frederick Aiken. The rest of the cast is overflowing with many notable names, even if some of them just show up for a scene or two then leave. Among them are Evan Rachel Wood, Tom Wilkinson, Kevin Kline,…

    • 677 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays