Preview

The Felons Right to Vote

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
640 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Felons Right to Vote
June 19, 2013

Should Felons have the right to vote?
Should Felons have the right to vote?

Our country was founded on democracy; it is what sets us apart as a nation. How can we consider ourselves a true democracy when we don’t let certain members of our society have the right to vote and participate in that democracy. Since the founding of our country most states in the U.S. have enacted laws disenfranchising felons and ex felons from voting. There are forty-six states and the District of Columbia that have laws that deprive inmates of the right to vote. Thirty- two of those states have laws that convicted felons may not vote while on parole, and in twenty -nine of these states offenders may not vote while on probation. There are fourteen states where ex offenders can be disenfranchised for life. 3.9 million Americans are estimated to have currently or permanently lost their ability to vote because of felony convictions. The U.S. Bureau of justice reports that two-thirds of released offenders are re-arrested within three years of released and it is suggested that those statistics are just those that have been caught committing a crime. While felons who have been convicted and are currently serving sentences or on parole should not have the right to vote. What of those who have served their time successfully? Have they not paid their debt to society? I am not suggesting that the moment an offender is released from custody or parole they should automatically be re-enfranchised they’re right to vote. I am, however, suggesting that after a certain credible amount of time without infractions, hasn’t that person proved that their interest have become aligned with that of an ordinary citizen. Studies from the University of Minnesota College of Liberal Arts show that the choice of roles is relative to functions of social relationships and role commitments. Symbolic interactionists emphasize adult work and family roles in explaining the transition away from crime.



References: Sentencingproject.org Oxfordjournals.org socsci.umn.edu

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    For most people, the idea slavery and the loss of freedom, along with basic human rights, ended with the abolishment of slavery and the following civil rights movement. However, authors John Irwin and Michelle Alexander bring light to the startling present day horrors that convicted criminals face as they journey through America’s jail system. It appears that criminals no longer are simply punished for the duration of their sentence, but for the rest of their lives as well.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “When They Get Out” by Sasha Abramsky cries out to the general public for the change in corrections that the convicted are unable to do. Abramsky leaves nothing to chance in his war on the prison systems for the awakening of the American society to an ever growing problem. Therefore, Abramsky commissions an argument with real uncensored facts. In spite of how incarceration envisions reforming the convicted, Abramsky argues that the prison system corrupts prisoners into worse criminal behaviors. Throughout his essay, Abramsky vehemently questions the true motive of the continuously expanding correctional system. As Abramsky blatantly brandishes the numerous faults of corrections, he splits the purpose of corrections into two separate motives,…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roughly, about thirty percent of the US adult population is a convicted felon. Forty-eight of fifty states restrict these criminals' voting rights; that is the equivalent to millions of unheard voices. Even though many say that offenders should not be trusted with political matters, they are still human beings and they deserve their unalienable rights. They are human beings, regardless of the crime they have committed and like everyone else, they deserve to improve their lifestyle. For this reason, and many others, the US government should remove voting restrictions on convicted felons.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revoking convicted felon’s rights to vote has been an issue at hand in politics since the beginning of our nation. Edward Fesser published an article in the magazine titled City Journal called “Should Felons Vote?” In the article he is arguing against the views of Democrats and their motives for restoring convicted felons voting rights. He says their motives are to expand their chances in winning an election. Edward Fesser’s argument is weak because he fails to provide substantial evidence supporting his arguments on the disenfranchisement of felons.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think a convicted felon should have the right to vote after they spend their sentence in prison and finish with parole. I will give you three reasons why they should. My first reason is they are citizens like us and they might not be guilty. My second reason is ever though there not out and free they do watch TV to see what’s going on. My final reason is if it was polices officer or a famous person they still are aloud. The next paragraph I will tell you about my first reason.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the law, everyone is entitled to vote, to be specific, the age of 18 and above. I believe felons should be allowed to vote because people make mistakes. There are many people who want to live right, they can’t because they are being kept down, the situation they’re in leads them to be in a bad place. For example, if a person commits theft, it’s most likely they’re poor. He/she steals because they are desperate for what they don’t have; basic needs or necessities of life. I believe felons should be allowed to vote, even if they are criminals, they deserve a second chance, it is not fair to take away their right to vote. This is as if like taking away their freedom of speech. Everyone has a voice and it should stand out, even if…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal justice stakeholders affected by various social, political, economic, and institutional forces throughout the last five decades have implemented policies that have increased reliance on incarceration and its punitive purpose. In contemporary criminal justice reform efforts to scale back mass incarceration, some of the most active stakeholders have been this year’s presidential candidates, the for-profit prison industry, and community-based organizations.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Felons

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This large group of people would sway the votes for the worse. “In 2010 an estimated 5.85 million people in the United States (2.5% of the nation's voting age population, excluding DC) could not vote due to a felony conviction”(Number). A group as large as this could possibly turn the tide for elections. If all of these criminals were in California which is the most populous state, they would make up about 7% of that state. What kind of examples would this set for children if the United States restored this right to vote? “In 2004, one in every 31 adults [U.S.] was under correctional supervision, compared to one in 88 in 1980.”(Votes). Numbers like these are shocking and mortifying. Take into account that this means that the same people who have killed, raped, or robbed someone could have the fate of America resting in their hands.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Voting is a duty that must be fulfilled by every citizen at some point in their lives. Voting gives the citizens of the U.S. a chance to express themselves through an anonymous voice. There are a few restrictions on voting, which include age, citizenship, and in some states weather you’re a convicted felon. I believe that it is unfair that some states make it so felons can’t vote. I really believe felons should be allowed to vote simply because everyone makes mistakes, and some felons have to rejoin society eventually.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many of the prisoners being democrats, this takes away from all their votes with a mass of the people not being allowed to vote. A good example of this could be the election in 2004 with George Bush, a republican, who was able to win the presidential election with influence from his brother in Florida to get him an extra electoral vote which counts more than the popular vote. Felon’s rights are already limited with many restrictions being put on them due to the government not having any trust over them and still see them as criminals. A list of restrictions including traveling abroad, owning a gun, many employment opportunities as well as other privileges citizens are able to use such as applying for grants, living in public housing, SSI and food stamps. If a felon is a parent as well, their parental rights are diminished because in any case the judge will award the other parent custody due to the conviction. With all this, this conviction will be on the person’s personal…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The number of Americans who cannot vote because they have been convicted of a felon continues to rise. According to the National institute of justice about a quarter of felons are in prison, but the rest have completed their sentences and are on probation or parole. The only reason not to let them vote is to stigmatize them or to continue punishing them. Voting would help ex felons re-engage with society by showing them that they have equal importance in the society, for example ,it shows that their opinion is just as important as anyone else's. Also, this may not always be a good thing. Not all ex felons can be trusted and not all ex felons judgment and credibility can be trusted.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay discusses my reflection on whether or not felons should have the right to vote. A felon is defined as a person who has been convicted of a felony, which is a crime punishable by death or a term in state or federal prison. A felony is a serious crime usually punishable by imprisonment or death. Convicted felons should not be allowed to vote. Many Americans were not allowed to vote these past elections. It wasn’t because they didn’t pay taxes or were mentally incompetent or underage. The reason why they can’t vote is because they are convicted felons. Once someone has committed a serious crime or felony, they have shown that they are not trustworthy enough to vote. Because they disobeyed the law, they should not have the obligation to vote. If one is sent to prison, they have agreed that most of their rights have been taken. Prison is meant to be a punishment and one of their punishments is their loss of freedom and democratic rights for their time of their sentence. Convicted felons have also demonstrated poor judgment and should not be trusted with a vote. The main point of a prison sentence to show the offender and society that criminal behavior results in loss of freedom and most of the rights that freedom has to offer. Therefore felons should not be allowed to vote. Although some people believe that felons should be allowed to vote at any circumstance but I believe that if they are felons they have already lost that opportunity because they have decided to make the choice to participate in criminal activities. If the felon is not willing to follow the law himself, then they should not demand the right to vote. In California, felons serving time in prison or county jail are denied their right to vote. According to The Sentencing Project, 5.3 million Americans were unable to vote in 2008 due to a felony conviction. Unfortunately, statistics show that this number is expected to rise to 6 million.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In, “Beyond the Prison Bubble,” published in the Wilson Quarterly in the winter 2011, Joan Petersilia shows different choices about the imprisonment systems. The United States has the highest incarceration rate of any free nation (para.1). The crime rate over a thirty year span had grown by five times since 1960 to 1990. There are more people of color or Hispanics in federal and state institutions then there are of any other nationality. The prison system is growing more than ever; the growth in twenty years has been about 21 new prisons. Mass imprisonment has reduced crime but, has not helped the inmate to gradually return back to society with skills or education. But the offenders leaving prison now are more likely to have fairly long criminal records, lengthy histories of alcohol and drug abuse, significant periods of unemployment and homelessness, and physical or mental disability (par.12).…

    • 259 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has become conventional today to dismiss the good in criminals. Collateral consequences are the result of this common ideal, intended to further punish criminals after prison. The American Bar Association’s National Inventory of Collateral Consequences catalogs over one thousand collateral consequences of conviction in Washington state alone, ranging from felon disenfranchisement to ineligibility for medical care and food stamps. The consequences of conviction set ex-criminals up for failure, and eventual recidivism. Although considered to ensure community safety, collateral consequences should not be imposed on ex-felons due to their detrimental effects on individuals and society and inability to recognize rehabilitation.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Voting Controversy

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe that this is a tough question to answer. I feel that this is one of those questions where I am able to see understand and level with both sides. In the end, however; I do believe that voting is a privilege. Although many people do not believe it and choose to argue otherwise; your vote DOES matter. I believe that by voting you are doing your duty as an American citizen. By being in prison, you are getting this voice you have taken away. This chance you have to help make the change you desire for your country is taken away. I do feel as if this is unfair, but at the same time I understand where some people can see that prisoners do not deserve to use their voice. If someone is to break the law, go against rules that our country made,…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays