Preview

The Fundamental Attribution Error

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
509 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Fundamental Attribution Error
The fundamental attribution error plays a major role in our everyday lives. Until reading this section on the attribution error, I wasn't as aware of it as I am at this moment. Hopefully after you read the section and this short essay, you will be more conscious of this misattribution that happens right before your eyes, and you will be more aware when making attributions. The fundamental attribution error is the tendency for observers to underestimate situational influences and overestimate dispositional influences upon other's behavior. (Myers, 2008) In simple terms, when a person's behavior is unbecoming, we tend to automatically jump to a conclusion that the person has a bad behavior, they're rude, etc. Very seldom do we look at the situation that the person may be in, whether it's personal or work related. In every event there is always cause and effect. Many times in misattributions, the cause of a person's behavior is underestimated.

As an observer, I've noticed a soldier who never really said much at work, and always walked around looking sad. This soldier wouldn't really help out much either when it was time to do details or clean the office daily. I begin to think that this person was lazy and would look at the soldier with mean stares. When I learned of the soldier's situation, he was diagnosed as depressed, I begin to think of what may have caused the depression. War had a major affect on his behavior, and the way I perceived him was incorrect. I had overlooked his situational influence, and overestimated his dispositional influence. I apologized on the inside, and no longer looked at that person in that way.
This also changed my viewing of everyone else that I encountered. Instead of just making an attribution, I really tried to look below the surface to see what was the real problem. Attribution researchers have found a common problem with our attributions. (Myers, 2008, no page # needed here-102) When explaining

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    16 Lagasoline

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Write a proportion problem. Design the problem so that the solution is “Leslie would need 16 gal ofgasoline in order to travel 368 mi.”…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Man3240 Exam 2 Study Guide

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory describes how causes are attributed to past events. This may be dispositional (attributed to a person) or situational. In a single instance of an outcome, correspondent inference theory suggests diagnosis is based on choice, expectations and intent. Expected, freely chosen behaviour is considered to be dispositional, whereas unexpected, forced behaviour is attributed to situation. Attributing intent is simplest when considering behaviour with only one positive effect. When an outcome occurs numerous times, covariation theory describes possible cause attribution. This involves looking at cases where the suspected cause is present/absent and matching them to instances where the outcome is present/absent, utilising information on consensus (how others behave), distinctiveness (how the individual behaves in different circumstances) and consistency (how the individual has behaved in similar circumstances). Consistency should be high to make a good attribution judgement. When consensus and distinctiveness are also high, the attribution is likely to be situational whereas if consensus and distinctiveness are low, a dispositional attribution is likely.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitive Psych Study Guide

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Describe the difference between personal and situational attributions in explaining behavior. What is the Fundamental Attribution Error, and how is it related to these types of attributions?…

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Gerhardt, Deborah R., “The Rules of Attribution.” Practical Argument: A Text and Anthology. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011. 299-301. Print.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why did the person’s behavior change? Why do they act like they do? There are four significant ways that help to determine the reason or cause of problem behavior. The initial three approaches are natural causality, psychodynamic causality, and psychological causality (Kanwischer & Mehr, 2011). These three approaches come under the Intrapersonal aspect.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2011). Citing sources; avoiding plagiarism. In A Writer 's Reference (7th ed., pp. 448-451). Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin 's…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-Serving Bias

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How would you explain the similarities and differences between fundamental attribution error and self-serving bias to someone who was not familiar with the two concepts?…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s so easy to point a finger. It’s easy to put the blame on someone and make yourself believe that you are who you are because of the hurt this person has caused.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    psych

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    14. Fundamental attribution error: a bias toward overattributing the behavior of others to internal causes…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While figuring out what causes people to behave in the way that they do, we cannot forget the biases that may come along with it. We tend to make snap judgements of people, as the book says we have a “gut feeling.” However, going by these “gut feelings” we tend to choose one attribution over the other and they usually are not very nice attributions. For example, in class when asked to list reasons a person may be rude to you on the road, most of the reasons we came up with were that the person was an asshole or they were annoyed or what not. We tend to blame the person and not the situation. This is part of the Fundamental attribution error. While when talking about other people we often call them annoying or impatient. However, when…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cognitive Dissonance Paper

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The attribution theory attempts to explain how we attach meaning to either our behavior or other people’s behavior. As explained by Malle (2011), the attribution theory examines how the social observer uses certain tiding to arrive at contributory clarifications for certain events. Attribution theory, therefore, is keen on examining how information is gathered and shared to shape a causal ruling. The first proponent of this theory, Heider believed that individuals are naïve psychologists who try to make sense out of the world around them. This theory was later taken up by various…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, researchers are more focused on “how people develop their own ideas about other people, that is attribution theory, and the ways these ideas are organized, that is called personal construct theory (Hartley113). The attribution theory, is set to explain how we perceive each other. Once we are able to master the attribution theory, we are able to understand why we perceive each other the way we do; this allows us to analyze what we will say and how we will say something in the future ahead of us, such as in perception checking. Attribution theory determines “how people decide the cause of other people’s actions and vice versa” (Hartley 116). When faced with hard times, it is important that we come to understand that “our perception of other people is inextricably bound up with our perception of the situation that we believe they are in” (Hartley…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychology Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the biases commonly seen in attribution, including the fundamental attribution error, the actor-observer effect. List the factors that may account for these biases.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays