Preview

The Gettier Problem Summary

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
997 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Gettier Problem Summary
First, I will describe how Goldman’s ideas affect the premise of the scientific method, in subjects such as the sciences and research. I will then elucidate upon how Goldman’s idea of causal connections could be used in everyday life situations, such as cooking or baking.
Summary:
According to Goldman, a more accurate proposed account of knowledge entails the idea that “S knows that p if and only if the fact p is causally connected in an ‘appropriate’ way with S’s believing p” (369). In order to fully comprehend the concept of an account of knowledge in its more accurate form, it is crucial to understand what the term appropriate refers to.
Goldman states that: “‘Appropriate’, knowledge-producing causal processes include the following: (1)
…show more content…
In the hard sciences, such as biology and chemistry, as well as other careers that apply research, the scientific method is considered the foundation for all bases of knowledge. In the Gettier problem, there are scenarios where it is possible that coincidences can occur, which may alter the process of obtaining the correct form of knowledge. In research as well as in the sciences, it could potentially be dangerous for any coincidences to occur in the results of an experiment. Therefore, a specific process known as the scientific method, is implemented in order to ensure that coincidences do not occur, and that there is a direct causal relationship between the variables. The scientific method involves steps such as “observing, forming a hypothesis, conducting the experiment and analyzing the conclusion of the experiment itself” (Strandgaard 2015). The experiment must be repeated multiple times to ascertain and verify the validity of the results. This is akin to Goldman’s idea, where he inserts a causal relationship into the premises, in order to validate the traditional analysis of knowledge. If the Gettier approach were to be used in these particular subjects, there would be no certain form of knowledge, and all research would be deemed as invalid and not …show more content…
Goldman strongly believes that ideas in knowledge must be connected in an appropriate manner such as through a causal chain, memory, perception, or a viable combination of those factors. He also mentions that these factors must be used as an additional requirement to the traditional analysis of knowledge. By utilizing this process, it is possible to avoid occurrences of epistemic luck and coincidences that could arise due to knowledge obtained by the Gettier problem. Goldman solves the Gettier problem by creating restrictions, which is heavily implemented in research fields as well as the sciences. These fields have a specific protocol, known as the scientific method, which involves testing and retesting, to verify the results of an experiment. This procedure creates the causal relationship that Goldman often uses. Goldman’s idea can also be used in the premise of baking, where a specific temperature and amount of time is crucial for yielding perfect results. This is contrasted to the Gettier Problem, where different temperatures and amounts of baking time can be used, with coincidentally decent results. Overall, Goldman’s idea of implementing a causal chain to create a more accurate proposed account of knowledge is extremely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the standard account, true belief is not sufficient for knowledge. It states that knowledge requires, not only that our beliefs be true, but that we have good reasons for believing them to be true. In standard account, knowledge is justified true belief.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not all scientific paradigms are correct. In order to understand, there must be experiments to prove whether a hypothesis is correct or incorrect.To prove whether a hypothesis is correct there must be physical evidence. In this lab will be looking at the different scientific paradigms to see if they are correct. In this lab we conducted a scientific test of astrological predictions, test for psychic abilities, test the conception that quartz has on curative properties, and formulate an experiment to test the conception that a good luck charm will affect the outcome of future events.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In John M. Berry’s speech, during the time of the influenza, his audience is the people in general, especially those curious about scientists and their work. The purpose is to prove to people that scientific research is very challenging. Furthermore, he discussed how scientists must accept uncertainty in order to find an answer to their experiment; it is very difficult for people to accept uncertainty. John M. Berry is able to characterize scientific research as challenging by showing all scientists must embrace uncertainty in the beginning of his speech, undergo tedious work towards the middle of his speech, and find the correct solution to their experiment at the end of his speech.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Science has evolved over the years. New machines have been invented over the past years which make it easier for scientist and their experiments. John M. Barry author of The Great Influenza specifically targets scientist and their research. He argues that a good scientist knows that there may be doubts, or that their assumptions may be proven wrong but they don’t stop trying.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this lesson, we begin a new unit on epistemology, which is the philosophical study of knowledge claims. In this first lesson on epistemology, Dew and Foreman discuss some of the basic issues raised in the study of epistemology and then discuss the nature of knowledge itself. They consider questions such as, “What do we mean when we say we know something?” “What exactly is knowledge?…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SCIE1000 Philosophy Essay

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In order to gain a thorough understanding of the topic being discussed, let me provide an introduction to inductivism, the issues raised by this method and the falsificationist account that aimed to solve these issues.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theory of knowledge; often provokes big questions on the meaning and justifications of conventional knowledge.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    unit 7

    • 3699 Words
    • 19 Pages

    the researcher has the opportunity to test and validate existing theories about how and why…

    • 3699 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The scientific method is a method for research and study that is applied to investigate observations and to bring answers to questions. Researchers can exploit the scientific method to hunt for cause and effect relationships. Stated plainly, researchers can plan a study so that changes to an entity of the study influence something else in the study to vary in an unpredictable or expected manner.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Patricia Bennar

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Although this idea may seem common sense, it is the basis for all of the work that Benner has produced. She sees that knowing how to do something is different than the theory of scientific event and often practical knowledge can be more important than the theoretical framework that has been taught. Practical knowledge can also be developed before the scientific theories can be born.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Experiments differ from other ways of acquiring knowledge in that they allow one to – determine cause and effect…

    • 1547 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientific Method - Grass

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Recognize a question or unexplained occurrence in the natural world; Develop a hypothesis, or educated guess, to explain the problem; Design and perform an experiment to test the hypothesis; analyze and interpret the data to reach a conclusion, and Share new knowledge.” (Raven, P. H., Berg, L. R., and Hassenzahl, D. M., 2008, Environment, 6th Edition., pages 15-16)…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causation and Correlation

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When differentiating between causation and correlation, it is extremely significant in systematic thought. These two notions get confused with one another whether it is a misinterpretation or having the aspiration to provide a reasonable description for scientific observations. As a result, it is crucial to have the understanding of the difference between the two concepts. In this writing I will compare and contrast the concepts of causation and correlation.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scientific Method

    • 4542 Words
    • 130 Pages

    Learning Goal: To understand how the scientific method can be used to search for explanations of nature. The scientific method is a procedure used to search for explanations of nature. The scientific method consists of making observations, formulating hypotheses, designing and carrying out experiments, and repeating this cycle. Observations can be either quantitative or qualitative. Quantitative observations are measurements consisting of both numbers and units, such as the observation that ice melts at . In contrast, qualitative observations are observations that do not rely on numbers or units, such as the observation that water is clear. A hypothesis is a tentative explanation of the observations. The hypothesis is not necessarily correct, but it puts the scientist's understanding of the observations into a form that can be tested through experimentation. Experiments are then performed to test the validity of the hypothesis. Experiments are observations preferably made under conditions in which the variable of interest is clearly distinguishable from any others. If the experiment shows that the hypothesis is incorrect, the hypothesis can be modified, and further experiments can be carried out to test the modified hypothesis. This cycle is repeated, continually refining the hypothesis. If a large set of observations follow a reproducible pattern, this pattern can be summarized in a law—a verbal or mathematical generalization of a phenomenon. For example, over the years people observed that every morning the sun rises in the east, and every night the sun sets in the west. These observations can be described in a law stating, "The sun always rises in the east and sets in the west." After a great deal of refinement, a hypothesis can lead to a theory. A theory is an explanation of why something happens. For example, Newton's theory of gravitation explains why objects tend to fall toward the Earth (as well as explaining the interactions between the Earth and the other…

    • 4542 Words
    • 130 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A scientist would initially observe and classify data. He would proceed to look for pattern in the data and formulate a hypothesis. Following this, the scientist would make a predication. The scientist would test this predictions through experiments. If the experimental results confirm the hypothesis, a scientific law has been discovered. The scientific method limits the influence of bias and prejudice in the experimenter. It provides an objective, standardized approach to conducting an experiment and, in doing…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays