The article then proceeds to talk about what it calls “The Illicit Trade in Antiquities” and how famous artwork is often stolen from dig sites and smuggled out of its country of origin.
The laws state that a piece of art that is found belongs to the country from which it was found, so the artwork that is smuggled out is often illegally sold. The evidence provided in this article helps make its argument strong. For example, the article talks about the sculpture of Hercules, and how the upper half was in a museum in Boston while the bottom half was dug up in Turkey, and the upper half of the sculpture was then believed to have belonged to Turkey (Art and The Truth: The Getty Kouros and Provenance). This proves that sometimes art truly does get stolen and smuggled out of its country of
origin. The article then takes one more flip back to the Getty Kouros, and now that the reader knows more about the forged and stolen art industry, it answers the main question of the article: Is the Getty Kouros real? After going into a bit of background about the piece, it goes on to discuss the scientific examination of the sculpture, and it is then determined that the Getty Kouros is in fact real. One problem I had with the article is the author seemed to put a bit too much of his personal bias and opinions into an article that should be factual and objective. When personal feelings are added and it is written by a subjective standpoint, it makes the reader question the validity of the article. However, overall the author did a great job with this article helping give the average reader insight into the world of art. The world of faking art will probably never be stopped, it can be considered a style of art all of its own to some people, however with technology advancing, it will become harder and harder to fake such masterpieces, leaving the causal art lovers, and the connoisseurs, to enjoy authentic pieces of art.