Preview

The Giving Pledge

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
927 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Giving Pledge
A – The Giving Pledge
1)

The giving pledge is a growing trend among rich families and individuals in America. It includes that the rich people, who want to join the trend have to donate at least half of their wealth to charity. The people who make the pledge, have all that in common, that even though they give away half of their fortune, they still have more money than they can spend in a lifetime.

In text two “My Philanthropic Pledge” Warren Buffet writes subjectively about the trend, and the reasons why he has make the pledge. He advocates the pledge, and encourages other wealthy people to do the same. One major argue he uses is that even though the supporters have to give away half of the fortune, it doesn’t necessarily means they have to change their lifestyle, but they can change thousands of people’s lifestyles for the better. It can mean life or dead for the poor and suffering, while it means little or big yacht for the rich. All in all, the attitude is very positive about the pledge, and as I wrote before, does Buffet advocate the trend with examples from his own life. He is the founder of “The Giving Pledge” and has self agreed to donate 99% of his fortune to charity.

The attitude and tone is very different in text tree “The rich want a better world? Try paying fair wages and tax” written by Peter Wilby. Just by reading the headline you can sense the aggressive tone, and know how Peter Wilby sees the trend. He stands as an opponent to the pledge. One of his points is that “the poor is written out of their own story” – he thinks that the poor have no influence on what the money the wealthy ones have donated is used on, and what the money really should go to, to help them as much as possible. Another main argue he uses is, that to make permanent change in developing countries, the initiative and alteration has to come from the inside – in other words, there has to be a form for revolution, to make the changes permanent.

He also accentuates

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Quote “Constructively changing the ways the poor are presented in every aspect of life is one progressive intervention that can challenge everyone to look at the face of poverty and not turn away.”…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why the pledge of allegiance should be revised, by Gwen Wilde, is a very well written essay that the reader would most likely deem convincing. Gwen Wilde states that the Pledge in its latest from simply requires all Americans to say the phrase “one nation, under God,” when many Americans do not believe in God. She uses many different writing strategies to get her point across in a very precise and appropriate manner. Although there are some minor problems, this analysis will explain how Gwen Wilde uses certain writing strategies that are able to back her argument with a very convincing approach.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are a lot of wealthy people in the world and not many are as charitable as Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie stated that “a man who dies rich dies disgraced”, with this saying you can get a sense of who he was as a person not just a business man (doc.8). Carnegie donated at least $100,000,000 a year of his money to education (doc.9). Carnegie donated $10,000,000 to the Carnegie peace endowment to hasten the abolition of war; he also…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1) Singer says that all affluent people have a moral obligation to give their money to…

    • 1804 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe Andrews has set up her essay well, her title alerting the reader of the topic, having an attention-grabbing sentence in the first paragraph starting with common phrases as “poor but honest”, and having a sense of her audience, taking account of how her readers feel about her arguments. However, I do think that she has made some problematic assumptions, lack of ethos, and not tying her arguments together to make them relevant throughout the essay. All of her arguments are completely opinionated, as she states in paragraph one and six that her statements are of “her own feeling” and “admittedly based on no evidence.” She demonstrates this in the first paragraph by first questioning the all-to common phrases “the deserving poor” and “poor but honest.” Phrases that Andrews associates when thinking about “the poor.”…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Gwen Wilde’s essay, “Why the Pledge of Allegiance Should Be Revised,” the author strongly believes that the pledge of allegiance should only be used for the sole purpose of patriotism. She includes in the essay the original pledge of allegiance, which was published in 1892 and did not include the words “under God.” In 1923, the pledge was revised for the first time replacing the original words, “my flag” with “the flag of the united states,” only to be revised the following year to “the flag of the United States of America.” In 1942 the US congress officially sanctioned the pledge. Finally, In 1954 President Dwight D. Eisenhower approved the addition of the words “under God” to the pledge of allegiance, which brings us to the authors argument of why the pledge should be revised.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethos Pathos Logos

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This public service announcement is a response to the need for change, regarding the distribution of wealth in the U.S. “The latest data shows that roughly 75 percent of the financial wealth in America is held in the hands of the top 10 percent of households. Or to invert this, 25 percent of all US wealth is divided up amongst the bottom 90 percent of the population.” (MyBudget360, 2013). Why should only 10% of Americans deserve 75% of the wealth? America is a country where everyone, whether you’re rich or poor, black or white, protestant or catholic, and democrat or republican there is supposed to be an equal chance to prosper and an equal voice in how this country is run. We are all supposed to be treated equally, yet only an elite, wealthy few are afforded privileges due to their financial status. In my view, the rich are in power and influence the most change, and it’s usually to help them become even richer.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading “As a Weapon in The Hands of The Restless Poor” one can feel motivated to help those in need. Earl Shorris appeals to emotion when he talks about creating a program to start to make a difference in the lives of the less fortunate. He starts out the story to say he is writing a book which makes him an author which is an example of ethos because he seems reliable. Shorris then states that the poor have been “Cheated” which is substantially true because the rich were given the opportunity to succeed more as someone who is poor and cannot even afford to feed themselves. In order to help the less fortunate out he has to create a program to help the poor succeed. After a Rhetorical analysis of “As a Weapon in The Hands of The Restless Poor” by Earl Shorris one can conclude that most people take for granted even the little things in life, if one were to open their eyes and see there are many people who do not have a dollar to their name, and we have so much that we tend to lose focus on helping the less fortunate succeed in the world we live in today.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Gwen Wildes essay, “why the pledge should be revised,” Wilde stroungly believes that the pledge of allegiance should only be used for the sole purpose of patriotism. In wildes essay she states many facts of the original pledge. Wilde states that the first original pledge, issued in 1892, read as I Pledge Allegiance To My Flag, And To The Republic For which It Stands; One Nation Indivisible, With Liberity and Justice for all.” In her essay she included that in 1923 “My Flag” was changed to “The Flag Of The United States,’ as a way to show patriotism to the United states. Wilde then included in 1954 the words “under god,’ were included. The two words “Under God,’ infiuatues wilde, as she says “In my view, the addition of the words “under god” is inappropriate. Wilde also adds that though many of Americans are Christian, or do believe in God, why should those of another belief or nonbelievers have to say “Under God” when it does not concide with their beliefs. “It is a commendable patriotic observance,” stated by Chief Justice Rehnquist. Wilde argues that the pledge should not be connected with religion in any way. Wilde believes that the pledge in itself should just simply state patriotism, or the respect of the flag. However, it should not have the ability to force americans to announce their religious standings. I feel as if the information Gwen wilde had given is well said. It is most certain that she took the time and done inclusive amounts of research on this topic before she wrote this essay. I also feel that her argument was consistent; she had many different fact to back her beliefs up. In the essay Wilde did not sway on her reasoning, she stuck with one side of the argument, providing much information needed to make a valid point, such as quotes from the supreme court, and the original pledge itself, along with how the changes come…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My choice of writing for the Rogerian essay is on the topic of the Pledge of Allegiance in School. “In a decision that stunned the nation, a federal appeals court in June ruled that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is unconstitutional because the pledge contains the words "under God" “ (Chmielewski). The banning of the Pledge of Allegiance is a very large controversial topic because one side believes that while the foundation of our country is religion, the other side believes that the reciting of the Pledge of Allegiance is an infringement on our First Amendment right. The Pledge of Allegiance began in 1892. It was a way of showing a sense of celebration for being an American. Since 1892…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People may abolish their government in the event that, their rights are violated by the government. When the government how to much power and the people no longer feel safe, then we may take action and alter or abolish the government.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Unbreakable Oath

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Oaths are sworn in court and other legal situations to ensure and promote honesty and responsibility for one’s statements and actions. In the short story Hrafnkel’s Saga, Hrafnkel swore an oath that he promised not to break – an oath that he made as a chieftain, a priest, and ultimately, a man. In Iceland, where the saga takes place, oaths are not to be broken or altered. In fact, oral laws are just as established as written laws (Wen). Hrafnkel is not guilty of Einar’s death because he kept a holy oath with Frey, and because there were logical and legal reasons why Einar had to be killed. Without Einar’s careless actions, he would not have faced death.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gospel of Wealth?

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie wrote an essay called the “Gospel of Wealth” in 1889. It describes his idea of the responsibility of philanthropy (the love of man) by the people that acquired their wealth on their own, in their own generation. Carnegie believes that most heirs of large fortunes waste all of their money on personal desires rather than either using the money wisely or keeping it and adding more to it. He even believed that giving large sums of you money to charity was no good. How could you be sure that every penny of that donation was going to something good if you weren’t running the organization yourself? However, if the donation to charity were used to help set these people back on track, instead of just temporarily providing for them, then he would gladly give to charity because tis would benefit them and it would benefit the whole community in the end.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pledge of allegiance was written in 1892 as "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." This was the first and original pledge of allegiance, later in 1954 the phrase “under god” was recommended by president Eisenhower to be added to the pledge and congress agreed. This decision gave us the pledge to be said for the next 63 years and counting. It is the belief by many people that the phrase “under god” should not be included in the pledge, there are facts to support this argument such as not all Americans believe in a god or believe in more than one god. There are also the supporters of the phrase whom argue my than ¾ of Americans do believe in god, as well as the pledge is not something one is forced to say (Anyone can choose not to stand and/or say the pledge). The facts supporting the phrase simply outweigh the opposing arguments.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Income Inequality

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the essay “The Gospel of Wealth” Andrew Carnegie says that the rich should invest their money to do good for the public (396). He argues that the rich should do something with their money instead of put it to waste when they die. Many people tend to not enjoy their money; they save until one day they realize it is too late. Carnegie believes that this money should be put into good instead of waste. One way that Carnegie mentions that the rich should do is charity. He used the example of a free public library in New York City to support his argument. A public library helps families and children economically, and educationally. If the children get the education they need they have better opportunities and less chance of living in poverty in the near future. Carnegie tries to convince us that; if the rich invest money into improving the community then there will be a slight chance of less poverty. I agree, but it also depends on the person. Some people take advantage of the help they are getting from government or even from higher class society. Carnegie idea could work but it may also backfire and make things worse. If the poor start to rely on the rich to help them with their problems, they may not do anything about it because they know there will be someone to “bail” them out of trouble. This is a bad thing because people would not want to start making effort to start doing better. A great example in America today is unemployment. Today the citizens receive unemployment money if they are layed or fired. Carnegie might say many people take advantage of…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics