Preview

The Goals of Sentencing in the Criminal Justice System

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1734 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Goals of Sentencing in the Criminal Justice System
The Goals of Sentencing in the Criminal Justice System
By: Brian Ouellette

Criminal Justice
CCJ 1020
Mr. Leonardo Cadogan

Abstract

In the United States there is no standard when it comes to punishment and sentencing. This area of the criminal justice system is in a constant state of change. Sentencing practices and goals are always being closely examined. From "getting tough on crime" to more rehabilitative approaches, the views and goals of sentencing are always being corrected.

Since time began, there was crime and with crime came the need to punish criminals. How criminals were punished and the methods behind the punishment changed throughout the times. Standards of punishment moved from banishment and fines to torture and “blood feuds” (Siegel & Senna, 2005). A more organized system of punishment came with the formation of Common Law, which was brought over to the United States from England. With the development of a system, there was a move away from physical punishment toward methods more acceptably used today in the United States. Today there are many things the criminal justice system plans to do by introducing punishments and sentences. Goals of punishment have moved from satisfying the victim, as in early days, to more of a broad scale. There are theories on how punishment and sentencing may serve to reduce crime as a whole. General and specific deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, retribution, and restoration are just some of these goals. According to Barlow, general deterrence is the idea that, "people refrain from crime because they fear the punishment that others have received" (2000). This means that one might be deterred from committing a crime if he or she knows it carries a harsh punishment. This points out that many criminals do not take the time to consider punishment. Many of them do not believe they will be the one to get caught. Also, general deterrence


References: Schmalleger, Frank (2012) Criminal justice: A brief introduction 9th edition Barlow, H.D. (2000). Criminal justice in America Lubitz, R.L., & Ross, T.W. (2001, June). Sentencing guidelines: Reflections on the Future Siegel, L.J., & Senna, J.J. (2005). Introduction to criminal justice: 10th edition Tonry, M. (1999, September). Reconsidering indeterminate and structured sentencing
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cja234 Week 3
    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cja234 Week 3

    The Department of Corrections has continuously changed their goals and objectives throughout the history of corrections. The continuous changes to policies have many contributing factors beginning with the Attorney General, Governors, and appointed directors of the incarceration establishments. With changing laws, new problems arising and changing political stand points based on campaign agendas prisons themselves have been forced to adapt. When asked what the objectives of punishment are here in the U.S., my first thought would be that the goal of punishment would be to enforce society’s laws and ensure the public’s safety. Punishment is also used as a deterrent in the hope it will persuade possible future offenders against committing criminal acts. The objectives of punishment vary between the state and the federal objectives on corrections.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Should Mandatory Sentencing Be Introduced in Australia?
    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should Mandatory Sentencing Be Introduced in Australia?

    The sentencing system should not be altered, for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right of an offender to a fair trial. Furthermore, set and compulsory sentencing ignores personal circumstances, which in some cases could make all the difference. With these aggravating factors, hardening the system of law will not bring any advantages to society.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing The State And Federal Objectives Of Sentencing
    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing The State And Federal Objectives Of Sentencing

    In this paper the topics that will be discussed will be what are the state and federal objectives of punishment? How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? With support for that answer, what is the determinate and indeterminate sentencing? As well as which sentencing model that is felt the most appropriate? With an explanation as to why and examples will be provided.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Deterrence Model: Fear Of Preventing Crime
    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Deterrence Model: Fear Of Preventing Crime

    The deterrence model is the idea that the fear of punishment will prevent criminals or potential criminals from committing a crime. There are two different types of deterrence, which are general and specific. General deterrence is the preventing crime among the general population. The general public includes only those who have not committed a crime before. Specific deterrence is trying to prevent a specific group of people or specific person from committing a crime in the future. The deterrence model has been noted to not be effective. The deterrence model is half way effective because it does put fear in some people, but it does not exemplify all the many reasons people commit crimes. Many criminals or potential criminals may fear being…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Crj 316 Criminal Sentencing Research Paper
    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Crj 316 Criminal Sentencing Research Paper

    Sentences for crimes committed have been handed down for as long as there have been crimes to commit. There are many factors to be considered by the judge tasked with sentencing in a criminal case, including an offender’s criminal history and actual involvement in the commission of the offense. First-time offenders may be grated leniency in sentencing, but it can be argued that such a practice is contrary to the nature of punishment and detracts from the effects of the crime on the victims. Punishment serves three general purposes that serve to benefit the victim, the public, and the offender: retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper
    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper

    Earlier responses to crime were to be brutal, which included torture, humiliation, mutilation, and branding. These kinds of punishments often attempted to relate the punishment to the crime, as close as possible. The first response to crime incorporated linking criminal acts to sin and developing strict punishments. Throughout the years, this thought process has changed into a more humane system. The reason for corrections to is to protect the society but also to provide rehabilitation to these individuals. Punishments for criminals now include main objectives that widely differ from the first believed aspects of punishments. Punishments now embrace objectives pertaining to deterrence, incarceration, rehabilitation, retribution and restitution.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Five Goals Of Contemporary Sentencing
    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Five Goals Of Contemporary Sentencing

    Assorted sentencing philosophies continue to permeate state-level judicial systems. Each state has governed its own laws, and making changes of the statutes are not likely. There is a huge variation from one state to another in the laws and procedures that control the imposition of criminal sanctions.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    The complexities of human nature, emotions, thought, morals and ethics have been debated for centuries, and the dilemma of sentencing another human to a form of corporal punishment, incarceration or death, requires a firm foundation in the laws of the land, tempered by years of study and dedication to the law one has sworn to uphold. The several reasons for sentencing of a crime is: Revenge, for an actual or perceived need for vengeance on a violation, usually one that is very personal and emotional in nature. Incapacitation, which is to prevent the criminal from repeating crimes against society by placing them into a correctional facility on a long term or permanent basis. Restoration, is a form of sentencing when the convening authority is attempting to protect the victims by helping them to feel safe and secure. Deterrence is a sentence where the courts attempt to prevent the subject of a crime from offending again. Retribution, which is probably the oldest reason for sentencing was utilized for equal punishment to the crime, drawing from the old adage “eye for an eye”. Lastly is the sentence of rehabilitation, which in societies modern view, the ideal and preferred sentence,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing
    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    Several different objectives exist in sentencing, including “deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution” (2012). Retribution is a sentencing objective that has proven to be the most effective in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Integral Role Sentencing Plays in the Criminal Justice Process
    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Integral Role Sentencing Plays in the Criminal Justice Process

    There are two forms of deterrence: General deterrence and specific deterrence. General deterrence is a basic principle that by punishing one criminal, others may be dissuaded from committing similar crimes. Specific deterrence is a principle that assumes an individual, after being punished, will not be likely to repeat that criminal offense again with the fear of receiving the same punishment.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Goals Of Sentencing
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Goals Of Sentencing

    The sentencing phase of the criminal justice process is where a guilty offender is sanctioned for his conduct. The goals of sentencing include retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation. Historically the primary goal has varied by criminal justice era and the crime committed. However, each sentencing goal has a specific purpose (Masters, et al., 2017). The sentencing goal of retribution is normally pursued in heinous crime cases. Its aim is to castigate the offender. In contrast, rehabilitation is a sentencing goal that seeks to correct offender conduct, by teaching offenders, skills that aid in the prevention of recidivism. On the other hand, the sentencing goal of deterrence seeks to discourage future criminality by way of…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    legal
    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages

    legal

    Gundy Case – warrants incorrectly filled out and arguably police actions were illegal which resulted in the death of David Gundy in 1989Candidates are being asked to evaluate the statement, not necessarily the criminal justice system. Yet the marking criteria requires candidates to “Comprehensively and accurately evaluate how sentencing and punishment attempts to balance the rights of victims, offenders and society”. Poor question.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Diplomatic Immunity In Criminal Justice
    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Diplomatic Immunity In Criminal Justice

    The purpose of deterrence is to dispirit people from committing crimes by setting a model of what the penalties of crime can be. A modern example would be putting up a tow away zone for people who park in a lot illegally. This sign lets violators know that if they park in the parking lot without authorization their vehicle will be towed away. The next goal of criminal law is to protect society from dangerous and harmful people. This is why law enforcement agencies are gainfully employed to ensure the safety of law abiding citizens. Law enforcement agencies respond to illegal acts and actively go after criminals to ensure the safety of citizens and society. This goal goes hand and hand with the third goal, which is punishing people who have committed crimes. Law enforcement arrest criminals and they are prosecuted in the courts. Prosecutors along with investigators gather evidence and have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime. Then a jury of peers that live in the community hears the case and vote on the guilt or innocence based on the evidence presented. The last goal is to rehabilitate and reform people who have committed crimes. By implementing punishment such as fines, community service and jail time, the government hopes that a criminal will learn from his mistakes and change his ways. The goal of criminal law is to ensure that innocent people are…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Is punishment always the right solutions to stop crime?
    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is punishment always the right solutions to stop crime?

    Punishments are meted out for three reasons – deterrence, retributivism, and incapacitation. The first, deterrence seeks to prevent future wrong doing. Retributivism is linked to notions of justice where crime must be met with an appropriate punishment. The last, incapacitation, seeks to protect society at large from criminals. This essay will examine whether punishment is always the right solution to stop crime, in light of the reasons for dishing out punishment to criminals. From the perspective of justice, punishment is the right solution to stop crime, as justice must be upheld in society. However, from a more pragmatic point of view, punishment may not always be the right way to stop crime as it is often ineffective. Instead of just meting out punishment, the right solutions should focus on educating and reforming the offenders as well as educating the general public for the sake of a better society in the future.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal minds
    • 458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    criminal minds

    Chapters 14 & 15: Robbery, Burglary, and Related Crimes: White Collar Crime, Cyber Crime, and Commercial Crime…

    • 458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics