What’s the first mean of execution you think of? A firing squad? An electric chair? Hanging? What about the guillotine? Can you imagine walking up to a platform, laying down on a bench with your head in a hole and within 7 seconds your life being over? The guillotine was created for a less gruesome execution. It both succeeded and failed to display humanitarian beliefs and the ideals of the French Revolution. The guillotine symbolized the ideas of the French Revolution (Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity). It did this by creating equality through the way people were executed.
A first example of how the guillotine symbolized equality is who was executed. No matter what social class you were in you were executed the same way. Before the guillotine, “the form of execution depended in part on a person's class” (http://www.historywiz.com/guillotine.htm). Now, it didn’t matter whether you were of high class or low class, if you broke a law you were put through fair punishment of execution by the guillotine. The Declaration of The Rights of Man states that, “men are born free and remain free and equal” (Declaration of The Rights of Man, article 1). The guillotine represents equality in that men stay equal all their lives, even through death.
Although the guillotine succeeded at creating a sense of equality, it failed to symbolize the ideals of the French Revolution. During the Reign of Terror the leader of the Committee of Public Safety, Max Robespierre, abused his use of the guillotine. He took his power too far and people like him became, “crazed for bloody justice” (The Guillotine Project paper, front). Because of him, “around 50,000 were killed, many of whom lost their heads to the guillotine” (faculty.fullerton.edu/nfitch/history110b/rev.html). Some of these people broke laws but many were just people who didn’t agree with Robespierre or were against the revolution (counter revolutionaries). Jean Paul Marat, for instance, wrote the “Friend of the People”, a newspaper stating ideas of the Committee for Public Safety and calling out counter revolutionaries. This went against the ideals of the revolution because it took away the liberty of the French people. When Robespierre killed the counter revolutionaries, he essentially took away the right of the people to believe what they wanted to believe. A major right he took away was the freedom of speech which states that, “the free communication of ideas and opinions is one of the most precious of the rights of man” (Declaration of The Rights of Man, article 11).
The guillotine although invented to be a humanitarian device, symbolized something entirely different. The guillotine was invented with humanitarian interests in mind but it became something much more. To the people it was a sign of bloody death and fair justice. To the leaders it was a sign of control and power over the people, not a sign peace. It did, however, display some examples of humanitarianism. A humanitarian device is anything, “having concern for or helping to improve the welfare and happiness of people” (Dictionary.com, humanitarian). The guillotine helped to improve the welfare of the people but not necessarily their happiness. When the guillotine was first invented, it was argued that, “this method was the only humane mode of execution which insured the condemned a swift and painless death” (boisdejustice.com, The History of The Guillotine). In that way, it makes it more forgiving. Even though many people were executed, it was a painless death that made the death sentence more peaceful and harmless. The guillotine, as a result, evoked images of both a nation striving for equality and a society desperate for violent bloody justice.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
“enemies” tried in the morning and guillotined in the afternoon. Robespierre justified his use of…
- 1340 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
First of all,the Jacobin leader ,Robespierre became very paranoid and killed thousands of people at the guillotine.That is to say because he and other people did not like the king so he killed anyone who he thought or heard was a supporter of the king or liked the king.Eventually he started killing anyone who he did not like or looked at him funny.As a result he was executine on jul.27,1794 after the committee of public safety placed him on the guillotine after killing around 40,000 people.Acording to the documents most of the…
- 342 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
After the revolution, the peasants made sure they were heard. They started killing nobles; the guillotine was made making the death sentence faster and cheaper. Thousands were killed with the guillotine including Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette, his wife. The time after this was known as the Reign of Terror, when Maximilien Robespierre took over. During this period of famine and panic, the peasants were finally heard and released from feudalism. This French Revolution changed a lot helping commoners, but not the other people. It actually created a bigger war killing thousands of people. The people were…
- 408 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Not only was the Reign of Terror a big part of the French Revolution but it was a very unjustified event, creating sins among the people. They treated the dead as heads and bodies of simple animals rather than thinking of them as once humans. “Carried it mockingly, upside down on a cart, offering it to passers-by to spit on”(59). The people then went against the churches abolishing holidays which were important to many people and their beliefs. They also killed thousands, “many of these people were guillotined”(63). They would cut the heads of criminals and even innocent without trial. The guillotine began very popular through these months, becoming the number one way of killing. “The guillotine became one of the most powerful symbols of the French Revolution… It had a sharp, angled blade, which dropped quickly on a guided track”(65). These months were very gruesome for the people of france and many families, to where no one felt safe. These murders were sins, killed without reason or trial making the Reign of Terror unjustified.…
- 656 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Reign of Terror began because of the growing suspicion of common people supporting the nobles, and the monarchy. The first victim of this historic era was King Louis XVI, and he was most certainly not the last. Nine months later, Queen Marie Antoinette was too executed by the guillotine. The people were bound to their homes in fear of being accused of committing an offence, leading to arrest or death. Police spies were present all over Paris arresting both guilty and innocent, executing them because of pure suspicion. Some individuals were imprisoned or executed for having been wealthy, or talking to other people outside of their homes. (Doc. 6) This event ended with the beheading of Robespierre, one of the founders of the Reign of Terror, because suspicion became too disorderly and was destroying France as a whole. This mark in French history had to occur in order to show the nobles and the monarchs that they ( the people) weren't going back to the old society, where they had no say and were under unruly law. The founders of the revolution had to instill fear to ensure that the government wouldn't revert back what once…
- 919 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Reign of Terror was a time when many people were getting executed by the guillotine for even the smallest of reasons. For example in Document 6 it talks about the impact that The Reign of Terror had on citizens in Paris in 1793. One thing is that it had people moving to the suburbs more because less people got executed from there because there were thought to be more hierarchies living out there. The Reign of Terror was led by Robespierre and the National Convention. He was thought to be protecting the French Revolution by creating this. After the French got rid of King Louis XIV and Queen Antoinette they had a leader from the Revolution become the monarch; his name was Napoleon. Another impact of the French Revolution and Napoleon’s reforms had on a nation outside France. The weakness of governments impacted the French Revolution and Napoleon’s reforms. Also, governments got overturned because people didn’t want an absolute monarchy.…
- 990 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Many were victims of mistaken identity or were falsely accused. The guillotine was the “engine” of the Terror. Members of the Convention soon turned on the Committee of Public Safety. Robespierre was arrested and executed.…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Reign of Terror started with the onset of the French Revolution, and during this period of time anyone thought to be an enemy of the revolution was executed. Document 6 shows a picture of a public execution occurring with thousands of people watching. The primary method of execution was by guillotine and during the Reign of Terror this gruesome contraption took the lives of over 16,000 people over the course of 9 months. The Reign of Terror finally ended with the execution of Robespierre in 1794. When Napoleon seized power in 1799, many citizens saw it as a good thing. They believed France needed a strong leader, and Napoleon filled that description well. Napoleon believed that “To have good soldiers, a nation must always be at war.” (Document 8). He was a very strong military leader, and he always looked to achieve more military conquests. He won lots of crucial battles for France and was remembered as a great war…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This revolutionary event in history is most noted for the execution of thousands of citizens under the influence of other rebellious acts that grew popularity at the time. Famously, Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette were included under the list as these were important figures that were deeply involved in French revolutions. Despite this tragedy, this event is often times considered a momentous occasion in French history as it exemplifies the claim that this became the turning point for the outspoken France citizens. In order to acknowledge components of the French Revolution, it is essential to recognize the involvements of previous revolutionary acts, main causes, significant outcomes, recovery or possible solutions, and impacts on modern society.…
- 782 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Reign of Terror was unjustified because their punishments were inhumane. Even the littlest thing could get you to be killed. If someone didn’t like you or suspected something bad about you, it could get you killed. Many politicians didn’t agree with the ideas of Robespierre, so he had them be decapitated. The town of Lyons didn’t approve of the National Convention’s authority so “revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads in five minutes (Doc.C).” It was a cruel way for Robespierre to get rid of them. The reign of Terror also took away the people's freedom. The people couldn’t really do anything without being watched or suspected of doing something against the government.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Hanging, Lethal Injection, Electrocution, Gas Chamber, and Firing Squad are the five methods of execution that were used in the United States. The most commonly used method today in the United States is lethal injection. Only 36 states in the US are authorized to carry out executions (Ecenbarger, 2010).…
- 331 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
20,000-40,000 people died from the guillotine alone. This loss adds to the evidence that people of France did not want the Reign of Terror, therefore it is not justified. The people of France might have been more okay with the Reign of Terror if it did not contradict France’s ideas of rights and actions. Originally it seemed that France was doing the right thing to hire spies in neighborhoods, also known as the “Committee of Public Safety” .However, the original idea of things being safer for citizens was soon shot down.…
- 553 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Why was beheading so influential for us today? The French wanted a more instant and innocent way to execute people, which is why they adopted the infamous guillotine to their arsenal of punishments. Making executions easier, faster, and less painful, less shameful and more plentiful than ever before. The French Revolution began in 1789, after years of French people being subjected to monarchical tyranny.…
- 1164 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
An execution is the carrying out of a sentence of death on a condemned person; the killing of someone as a political act. Execution of criminals and political opponents has been used by nearly all societies—both to punish crime and to suppress political dissent. This paper examines three executions: the execution of Mary Queen of Scots in 1587, the execution of Joan of Arc in 1431, and the execution of John Wayne Gacy in 1994. In history books, all three executions represent the sentence of death on a condemned person. However, one difference is that the methods of execution, the public perception of execution, and requirements to earn a death sentence have changed dramatically from 1431 to 1994. Mary Queen of Scots was charged with “treason”…
- 1594 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Sue, A. P. (1998, Jan 25). Pro-death penalty but chivalrous texans debate fate of karla faye tucker. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/408352096?accountid=32521…
- 294 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays