Preview

The House of Lords is More Effective Than the House of Commons at Checking Government Power

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
709 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The House of Lords is More Effective Than the House of Commons at Checking Government Power
The House of Lords is now more effective than the House of Commons at checking government power.

Originally the House of Lords was one of three houses of parliaments, but after its merge with the House of Clergy it became equal to the House of Commons. This meant that neither party where more effective than the other at checking one another’s power as they were both equal, however after the House of Commons became an elected house, it healed most of the power, making the House of Lords the under dog. The powers of the House of Lords where then restrained further in 1911 due to the Parliament Act, which meant that the House of Lords could no longer, block a bill but only delay it for two years, later to be reduced to one year.
In 1958 another change commenced to the House of Lords meaning that all but 92 hereditary peers where removed. The life peerages act of 1958 then replaced the hereditary peers which gave the prime minister the right to appoint members of the upper house for life depending on if they have achieved something great within their life, or excel in the line of business that they are in such as sport, business, charity. However this had a more positive effect on the house regarding its checking powers because after this the House of Lords inflicted over 400 defeats on the labour and conservative governments including the prevention of anyone under 15 being placed in a secure college within young offenders detention centres, which could of led to their harm. However the House of Lords only has the power to block a bill for a year which means that the House of Lords can still proceed with a bill after this time such as the hunting act which the House of Lords blocked in 2004, however it still came into effect in February 2005.
Yet, the reformed House of Lords means that technically no party has a majority because during the days of hereditary peers the conservative party was hugely popular amongst the lords, however now there is no majority, with
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11

    They wasnted the Lords to never again block a measure passed by the House of Commons. Therefore in 1990 they drew up a bill to curb the power of the House of Lords by taking away the power to veto. Reform of the Lords was vital as the Conservatives were strongly opposed to Home Rule for Ireland, and would vote against any Home Rule Bill in the Lords. This was necessary as the Liberals had promised Home Rule to the Irish Nationalists, in return for their support, so reform of the Lords had to take place before Home Rule could be brought in. The 1910 Parliament Bill proposed that the House of Lords was to have the power to amend or reject those bills the speaker of the Commons certifies to be true money Bills. The Lords veto was abolished, but could delay it for no longer than two years. Also the maximum period between general elections was to be reduced from seven years to five to make parliament more accountable to electors. Although the Bill was not as radical as it could have been because it did not alter the composition of the Lord. The Bill would easily pass through the House of Commons but to curb the Lords’ power would have to be passed by the Lords themselves. Asquith planned to ask King Edward Vll to create 570 new peers, who would be willing to outvote the Conservative Lords and therefore ensure the parliament bill…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Alco Pops Enforcing a Ban for and Against
    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Alco Pops Enforcing a Ban for and Against

    On the other hand some of the rules and regulations that the House of Lords have are similar to the stages of the commons. After the bill has been completed all its stages in the commons, changes to the bill in the house of the lords will require an extra stage in the commons called, lords amendments considered. Therefore implementing the ban will offer the vote to disprove or approve of any alterations made by the lords. In…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Were The Liberal Government In The Years 1906-1914
    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain How Successful Were The Liberal Government In The Years 1906-1914

    The Liberals claimed that the Lords were the selfish rich who weren’t willing to help the country, whereas the Conservatives tried to appeal to the wealthy stating that this would lead to social revolution and that is was the duty of the House of Lords to block controversial policy that the public hadn’t voted on. The Liberals won with a 2 seat majority and the support of the Irish Nationalists who were hoping to obtain Home Rule through the Liberal government which led to the tax being passed. This Liberal win led to the second constitutional crisis where the Liberals pushed a bill which sought to remove the power of the House of Lords to veto bills and replace it with a power of suspensory veto, to delay a bill for 2 years – yet remove their power entirely to alter ‘money bills’. The Lords rejected this again which led to Asquith going to King Edward VII asking him to create more Liberal peers which he agreed to but died before he could bring this reality. His son King George V preferred a more consensual agreement between the two parties and this led to the 1910 constitutional conference where the conservatives offered to reform Lords powers, yet the Liberals rejected this and the conference ended in November which led to the second 1910 general…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    TMA 1 W200
    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    TMA 1 W200

    The most important source of English Law is Legislation; it is implemented by the queen in Parliament I.e. the House of Commons, the House of lord and the Monarch. As part of the UK elections, citizens permitted to vote will elect an association to represent the House of Commons. On the other hand the House of Lords are not elected members and do not represent. At present majority of the Lords are selected by the Monarch on the advice of the Prime Minister; however the House of Lords Appointments Commission assists with the vetting nominations.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 made the UK more democratic?
    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 made the UK more democratic?

    The house of lords is the upper chamber of the Uk’s bicameral parliament, Beginning in the the 11th century. The house of lords’ role in government is to work with the house of commons to; make laws, check and challenge the actions of government ( the house of lords has no veto power) and provide independent competence. Firstly, in 1999 the Labour party under Tony Blair as Prime Minister reformed the house of lords. For centuries the house of lords consisted of members that inherited their seats, the Act removed such right. The act reduced members of the house of lords from 1,330 members to 669 members and a proportion of the members that are ‘cross benchers’ members with no party affiliation. In order for this act to receive supported votes, Tony Blair and the labour party passed the Weatherill Amendment that put in place a deal that allowed 92 of the 669 members to remain heredity. The reforms in houses of lords progressive towards democracy due to the fact that Historically, members of the House of Lords have been the richest and most important landowners in the country, who would pass their peerages down through their family, which creates bias towards the wealthy. By…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Discuss To The Extent Which Party Contr
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss To The Extent Which Party Contr

    In the House of Commons there are many parties all fighting individually for control of the house, and to be in power and govern the land of the UK. To win the election and do this a party or coalition of parties needs a 326 majority to be able to form a government. This system creates a dominance in the house of commons if that majority is achieved sufficiently, as with Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997 where he had over a 150 seat majority, it is this kind of one party dominance I am going to be discussing in this essay and whether or not it limits parliaments main function to represent constituents and pass laws which benefit them.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate the Claim That the Senate Is Far More Powerful Than the House of Representatives
    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evaluate the Claim That the Senate Is Far More Powerful Than the House of Representatives

    Evaluate the claim that the Senate is far more powerful than the House of Representatives…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent does the PM dominate the political system in the UK?
    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages

    To what extent does the PM dominate the political system in the UK?

    There are arguments to support that the PM dominates the political system. The PM has the power to do many things that will affect the state of hers/his country and therefore has to carefully consider the choices they make. The pm has many powers that proves his/hers dominance like the power of patronage, choosing the cabinet ministers, the power of royal prerogative and so on. This all gives him more power than the rest of parliament. However there are arguments to support that the PMs Power is limited; The pm may be proved weak when it comes to pressure of events, scrutiny by House of lords and opposition, the current coalition est.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has the formation of a coalition altered the relationship between Parliament and government?
    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To what extent has the formation of a coalition altered the relationship between Parliament and government?

    Since 1945, there has been a single party majority government. Before the coalition, the government could control parliament due to its large majority, however we’ve seen a recent change in the relationship between the executive and legislature. The main issues that arise would be from the small majority of just 76 in the Commons, the lack of support from backbench MPs and fact that Cameron is the first Conservative Prime minister to not have a majority in the House of Lords. The Coalition of the Liberal Democrats and the Conservative party lacks both ideological and tribal unity, which would normally derive from a strong, single party majoritarian government. This provides Parliament with more opportunities to examine and scrutinize the government.…

    • 787 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ap Gov't
    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ap Gov't

    Most legislation originates in the Commons. The House of Lords may take a part in shaping legislation, but it cannot permanently block a bill passed by the Commons, and it has no authority over money bills. The crown need not assent to all legislation, but assent has not been withheld since 1707.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Are British Prime Ministers as powerful as sometimes claimed?
    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Are British Prime Ministers as powerful as sometimes claimed?

    It can be argued that Prime ministers are almost omnipotent in the political system in the UK, this is due to the shear variety of powers in-which the prime minister holds, and the prerogatives that are taken advantage by the prime minister. However, checks on powers in the UK means that the prime minister is not as power as they appear, moreover, they are not separable from the UK political system, henceforth, they are controlled and limited within the system they are part of, thus, more often than not, prime ministers are less powerful then sometimes claimed.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Uk Parliament Is Increasingly Dominated by the Executive
    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Uk Parliament Is Increasingly Dominated by the Executive

    The word parliament derives from a word loosely translated as ‘to talk’ or ‘to deliberate’. The UK Parliament consists officially of the two Houses of Parliament: the Lords and the Commons and the monarch, which by convention, delegates his or her authority to a group of ministers known as the executive. The role of parliament is mainly to legislate and to govern the United Kingdom through elected representatives. However the executive has a special role over the legislatures and it has been argued that the UK Parliament has become increasingly dominated by the executive.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How far was Britain a democracy by 1918?
    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How far was Britain a democracy by 1918?

    At the beginning of the time period, 1850, Britain was not democratic. There was not a lot of choice concerning the political parties, there were only two parties: The Liberals and the Conservatives. Woman did not have any right to vote and were considered second class citizens. In England and Wales only one million and five men could vote and some men could vote twice. The distribution of seats did not take into account the migration of Britain. The House of Lords (HOL) were aristocracy that were their because of their ancestry. MP’s were unpaid and had to own property so the poorer classes could not be MP’s and therefore opinions not heard. A democracy is one which has universal suffrage, equal distribution of seats, wide range of choice of parties that cover a wide range of issues, everyone has the right to be an MP and the HOL should be trusted members of the public. By the end of the time period, 1918, the majority of these had been overcome, lots of people had the right to vote, redistribution of seats made it more equal, there were now more than two parties, the property qualification in becoming an MP was abolished and they were paid salaries and the HOL lost the right to veto laws and hold them for two years, they could only hold them for one year.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    “Constitutional Reform Since 1997 Has Not Gone Far Enough” Discuss
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Constitutional Reform Since 1997 Has Not Gone Far Enough” Discuss

    In 1999 Labour reformed the House of Lords; Labour removed 600 hereditary peers and reduced it to only 92 hereditary Lords in the House of Lords. However, the labor government did propose a system of “elected peers”, where the public could choose peers to sit in the House of Lords. This proposal was never fully implemented into the UK constitution. Until this proposal is full entrenched it is argued that the Lords are not democratically legitimate as all policy making institutions must have legitimacy. Therefore, there is much that can be done towards constitutional reform.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To what extent has the location of sovereignty changed in recent years
    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To what extent has the location of sovereignty changed in recent years

    One factor which can be argued to of had the biggest effect in terms of changing where parliamentary sovereignty resides in recent years is the EU. The UK initially joined the EC in 1973 since then the EC has become the EU and has also become increasingly more powerful over the UK as time has passed, the EU could even be argued to be supreme over UK statues and the UK parliament. This is shown in the factortame case in which EU law took precedent over UK wishes, allowing Spanish fishing boats to fish in UK waters, this was the first time UK law was scrutinized and removed by courts due to EU law contradicting these laws. Furthermore, being part of the EU ultimately is a way of binding the UK governments successors partly due to the fact that if the UK left the EU there could be major…

    • 1577 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics