Preview

The Idea Of Justice In Plato's The Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1259 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Idea Of Justice In Plato's The Republic
In The Republic by Plato, it revolves around the unknown concept of justice and throughout the book, attempts to illustrate what is justice with the soul-state analogy. This analogy presents Plato’s definition on justice by method of debate through a conversation between individuals to eliminate inconclusive premises, known as the Socratic method. Therefore, by assessing components of this analogy: myth of metals, tripartite of the human soul and different city-character pairs, it allows one to understand justice as a virtue for everyone, as an end to a means. The soul-state analogy is introduced in book two, however is developed in stages throughout the entire book. This analogy is created in reaction to Glaucon and Socrates’ debates on justice, …show more content…
Socrates concentrates on the individual’s soul, not body (591b). The soul is made up of three parts: appetite, reason and spirit (437c). The appetite part of the soul pertains to fulfilling pleasures and desires such as sex and luxuries, however, the reason may intervene on stopping these wants, as its function is to calculate what is best for the soul (439a-e). Thus lastly, the spirit pertains to feelings in anger, especially when reason fails to control it (441a-d). Socrates explains that the reason in the soul should dominate, in addition the spirit to follow and work in conjunction with reason and lastly the appetite to be checked by reason and spirit (441e-442c). This example can be exemplified to show an unhealthy soul of being ruled by appetite rather than reason and spirit. For example of the poet, Socrates explains that poetry is bad for the soul as it allows individuals to become too emotional and therefore, affects their reasoning calculations to function in the most just way possible (602a-e).
All in all, with justice identified in the city and soul, it allows one to understand how these two parallel each other in order understand Socrates’ idea of justice. Justice is harmony between the three parts of the soul, same as in relation to the classes of the city: each part doing its distinct function equally. The state and the soul relate as gold class corresponds with the reason, silver with spirit and bronze with appetite. Therefore, to contribute to a greater understanding of his justice, we must examine with examples of unjust cities and individual

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout Plato’s Republic, Socrates formulates an argument that is cohesive with the notion that one’s soul consists of three parts. He begins this argument by alluding to the fact that we need to determine whether or not the parts of our soul are similar, or different. “The same thing will not be willing to do or undergo opposites in the same part of itself, in relation to the same thing, at the same time,” this statement is an effective premise in his argument due to its unified applicability within the confines of ones soul. If ones…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is justice? Today, where it is common for people to only look out for themselves, justice is an extremely important tool. But what exactly is justice? What is right, what is wrong, and who decides that? To find an accurate definition, we as a society should not just focus on one opinion, but the views of many. Similar to how our society is today, the society in The Republic, lived the same, struggling to determine what the correct definition of justice was, and how to pursue the right answer. In the paper, I will be discussing all aspects of Plato’s Republic, including the Philosopher King and his nature, and justice in that time.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this paper we will show that Glaucon and Thrasymachus' positions on justice are entirely different. We argue that Thrasymachus despite his slippage and confusion between a traditional and immoralist definition of justice, is really intending to illustrate a political system ruled by a rational-minded and exploitative tyrant. On the other hand Glaucon clearly presents justice as a necessary evil originating out of a social contract constructed by the weak of society. He then challenges Socrates to prove to him that the life of a just man is better than the life of an unjust man.…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a man was not subjected to law or punishment would he choose to do what is considered just? In Plato’s The Republic, Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students, states a common view on justice. Justice is simply a lesser evil when compared to the two extremes which are suffering injustice without power to retaliate and doing injustice without suffering consequences. According to Glaucon, all men are inherently unjust, and only do what is just when forced to do so by law. This view of justice can be seen throughout history when leaders, like Nero, do unjust actions for their own personal gain simply because they are free from any consequences.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These experiences dictate who we are and what actions that we take. In this brief paper, I will explore the idea that the soul is a frame of reference that does not exist outside of our own individual experience, completely different from the mind and that it does not survive physical death.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is justice is a question that has plagued philosophers since the time of Plato when he wrote The Republic to present day. In the book, Plato uses the dialectic, between Socrates and other Athenians like Polemarchus, Cephalus, and Glacuon, to try and find the definition of justice. Through the voice of Glaucon, Plato defines justice as a compromise of sorts between advantage and fear, and injustice as the things that we wouldn’t…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his philosophy, Plato places a large emphasis on the importance of the idea of justice. This emphasis can be seen especially in his work ‘The Republic’ where, through his main character Socrates, he attempts to define the nature of justice and to justify this definition. One of the methods used by Socrates to strengthen or rather explain his argument on justice is through his famous city-soul analogy, where a comparison between a just city and a just soul/individual is made. Through this analogy, Socrates attempts to explain the nature of justice, how it is the virtue of the soul and is therefore intrinsically valuable to the individual, but it becomes apparent in the analysis and evaluation of the analogy that there may have been several purposes behind it. Inconsistencies within the analogy itself also raise questions to the validity in Plato’s definition and justification of justice.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates meets with some of his friends and begins discussing the meaning of justice and whether the just life is better than the unjust life. First, they contemplate the meaning of justice. Cephalus stated that justice is as simple as telling the truth and returning what you receive, Polemarchus stated that justice is giving each his due, and Thrasymachus stated that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Socrates proves each of them wrong and embarks on a discussion to find out what true justice is, and to find out whether the just man is truly happier than the unjust man, or vice versa.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between ¡§Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen¡¨ and ¡§Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society,¡¨ will help to position Plato¡¦s Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The position Thrasymachus takes on the definition of justice, as well as its importance in society, is one far differing from the opinions of the other interlocutors in the first book of Plato’s Republic. Embracing his role as a Sophist in Athenian society, Thrasymachus sets out to aggressively dispute Socrates’ opinion that justice is a beneficial and valuable aspect of life and the ideal society. Throughout the course of the dialogue, Thrasymachus formulates three major assertions regarding justice. These claims include his opinion that “justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger,” “it is just to obey the rulers,” and “justice is really the good of another […] and harmful to the one who obeys and serves.” Socrates continuously challenges these claims using what is now known as the “Socratic method” of questioning, while Thrasymachus works to defend his views. This paper seeks to argue the implausibility of Thrasymachus’ views through an analysis of his main claims regarding justice, as well as his view that injustice brings greater happiness.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The issue at hand is the consistency of the relationship between citizens and the law. It is in the common sense that laws should be upheld and citizens should obey them to maintain social order. However, in the instances that laws are unjust, obedience to them could result in harms to innocent citizens, the case which is brought up in Plato's works Crito and Apology, where Socrates was wrongfully accused of corrupting the youths of Athens and had to suffer the death sentence. Therefore, it is important to analyze the appropriate extend to which the 'rule of law' should be upheld in the cases that laws are unjust. This essay will analyze both extremes of the argument, those who insist on obeying the unjust rules and those who choose to disobey.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After Socrates explores the components of a just society, his reply to Glaucon is further explained by arguing for the soul’s division and also, more specifically, the account of the Tyrant. Plato has refuted each of Glaucon’s points in order to make Socrates reply more successful. The tyrannical man is the most unjustly man. He indulges in all his pleasures and sinks further into degeneracy (578a). Because of his desires and conflict to suffice his desires, he is left to resort to unjustly and immoral behavior (578c). Furthermore, Socrates also appeals to the rewards and consequences that one might find in the afterlife. Overall, Socrates description of the city being analogous to the individual soul, is what helps in making his reply successful. Plato’s reply though Socrates is the proposal to construct a city that will help determine what is justice in an individual case.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle on Gender

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As previously discussed from our lectures, Plato's idea of justice was concerned with an internal equality between the members of the classes present within the polis. This focused more on individualism in that one must only be concerned with his/her business and not minding other's problems. The justice that occurs in their society depends on the class to whom one belongs. However, Aristotle, his student, was more for all-encompassing justice aiming for the ultimate goal of the constitution.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the Republic, Socrates creates an imaginary city that is just known as Kallipolis in order to locate or find out what “justice” is. Justice is the last of the four virtues and can only be located once the other three virtues (wisdom, courage, and moderation) are found. To locate all of these virtues and ultimately justice, Socrates creates three classes in the city: craftsmen, guardians, and rulers. Wisdom is represented through the rulers, courage is represented through the guardians, and moderation and justice is represented by the city itself and how its citizens conduct themselves. To be more specific however moderation involves the mastery of desires and justice is represented through the citizens doing the one task they are best suited for. Let’s focus on the ruler’s however because Socrates gives them a special…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Plato

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Republic, by Plato discusses human morality and the difference between justice and injustice. Socrates is challenged by his peers to explain his views on the topic, which he claims that being just is the function of the soul. He is then confronted by more students who suggest that unjust humans have a better life than those who are just. To respond to this Socrates decides to create a city called Kallipollis in order to demonstrate why being just is beneficial to everyone in a society instead of just the weak. The Kallipolis is to be divided into three parts, the masses, the auxiliaries, and the rulers. These three separate sects will allow the city to run efficiently and to its highest potential. Each class will represent a different part…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays