Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Ideas of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke

Good Essays
299 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Ideas of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both seventeenth century English thinkers and writers. Each had their own views the government’s role and human nature which were vastly different from one another. They expressed their ideas in their works, Hobbes’s Leviathan and Locke’s Two Treatises of Government.
Thomas Hobbes published Leviathan in 1651, two years after the end of the English Civil War. In it, he supported an absolute monarchy and claimed that people had no qualms about compromising basic morals. Since people had a wicked disposition, if they were left to their own devices, life would become as quoted “a solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” If people wished for a safe and reasonable life they would have to relinquish some of their freedom. In his opinion, a weak government could not ensure such a thing, therefore only a strong government could force submission and quell the chaos innate to man.
Locke believed that people had the basic principles needed for a civilized society, so they were entitled to natural rights such as life, liberty, and property. In 1690, he published Two Treatises of Government which said that a government existed to protect peoples’ rights. He opposed absolute monarchy and thought that the best type of government was the one with limited power. It also had to be approved by the people. He also put forward an idea that the people could remove the government from power if it didn’t fulfill its duties or did not respect people’s rights. These ideas had inspired those who lead revolutions in America and France.
Both Hobbes and Locke had seen the English Civil War with their own eyes, and yet had unlike opinions of the nature of humans and the function of the government. Their ideas were significant through the Enlightenment.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “In Two Treatise of Government,Locke argued that people formed governments to protect their natural rights.The best kind of government he said had limited power and was accepted by all citizens.”(Ellis and Esler 183)…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Hobbes, the need of an outright power, as a Sovereign, took after from the utter ruthlessness of the State of Nature. The State of Nature was totally grievous, thus objective men would will to submit themselves even to outright power with a specific end goal to escape it. For John Locke, 1632-1704, the State of Nature is an altogether different sort of spot, thus his contention concerning the social contract and the way of men's relationship to power are subsequently entirely distinctive. While Locke uses Hobbes' methodological gadget of the State of Nature, as do for all intents and purposes all social contract scholars, he utilizes it to a very distinctive end. Locke's contentions for the social contract, and for the privilege of residents…

    • 152 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Locke agrees with Hobbes that the purpose of government is to create order in society but contends that people are reasonable and would cooperate with each other and could rebel if ruler were tyrant. Ruler stays in power only as long as he has consent of those governed. He said people had natural rights, including right to life,…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first sight, Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government, seemed quite similar to Hobbes’s Leviathan. They both believed that a state of nature is a state that exist without government. They believe that men are created equal in this state, however Hobbes argues that because of self-preservation, man possessed the desire to control over other man. Locke, on the other hand, reasons with a more peaceful and pleasant place.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were to philosophers with opposing opinions on human nature and the state of nature. Locke saw humanity and life with optimism and community, whereas Hobbes only thought of humans as being capable of living a more violent, self-interested lifestyle which would lead to civil unrest. However, both can agree that in order for either way of life to achieve success there must be a sovereign.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Locke

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Both Hobbes and Locke shared similarities within their political theories; however their theories also had some major differences. Both men were responding to the crisis of the 17th century and they were highly influenced by the scientific revolution. Hobbes and Locke rejected all previous theories regarding human nature. They used the same methodology, and the men accepted an atomistic view of society. They believed that individuals were rational and were motivated by self-interest. Hobbes and Locke traced their theories from a state of nature to the social contract. They agreed that the legitimacy of the government rested on the consent of the governed. Together, both men rejected legitimate political authorities such as Divine Right of Kings, brute force, historical tradition, and feudal contracts. Both political philosophers offered interesting arguments pertaining to government, human nature, and the state of nature.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Locke stated that if government fails to protect rights, then the people have the right to overthrow the government and set up a new one; where this movement differs is the use of non-violent revolution. Fundamental rights are given to all men or, citizens, and cannot be taken away; these are inalienable rights. These same rights are to be cherished and respected by people and government alike. John Locke’s ideas most went beyond alienable rights and went as far as revolting even for things like poor living conditions. Seeing Is that he as an eyewitness of the English civil war- which was by no stretch of the imagination a peaceful revolution - it is safe to assume that as an Englishman, John Locke’s ideas of revolution were very bloody, and as an Enlightenment thinker, he would most likely gravitate to the ideas which deviated from - at the time - societal norms.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke agreed with Hobbes on certain things but he also disagreed with him too. He wrote in the second treatise of government that man need to be governed by a ruler. John Locke is also famously known by what he believed in which was life, liberty, and property. These were the natural rights of man given by the government and if the government took away these rights, man has a reason to overthrow the government. As said before the idea that Locke said and believed influenced Thomas Jefferson to write the declaration of independence.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Locke, people formed governments to protect their rights which he called a "social contract." People agreed to obey the government and in return, government had the responsibility to protect peoples natural rights. “Locke’s views promoted the belief that “all men are created equal,” a belief that challenged absolutist.” (Hunt 505)…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He argued that all people were born equal with the natural rights of life, liberty, and property. He stated that the reason for government was to protect peoples natural rights. In his book Two Treatises on Government, he described the fairness of law. A quote from his book was “Those who are united into one body, and have a common established law and judicature (court system) to appeal to, with authority to decide controversies between them, and punish offenders, are in civil society one another…” Locke believed if a government failed to protect its citizens natural rights, then they had the right to overthrow it. His beliefs later became a foundation for modern democracy and his ideas inspired later revolutionaries in Europe and the…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes Essay

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The battle between Hobbes and Locke still continues today through their influence on governments and how they believed government should work. Hobbes believed in an absolute monarch where they were to demand obedience in order to maintain order. On the other hand, John Locke thought that a Democracy was a better form of government provided that they had the right information to make. This form of government allows the people to keep their natural rights rather than giving them up in exchange for protection by the monarch. As a result of their views on human nature and what form government should take, it is easy to see why Lockean government is more powerful than Hobbesian by looking at past governments in history as well as logically.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The seventeenth century in England was a time of many kings. Within a century, the reigns of five kings as well as a military dictator had run rampant over England’s government. Starting with James I, the English monarchy traversed to Charles I, Oliver Cromwell, Charles II, James II, and finally William III. With the ascensions of Cromwell and William III, drastic events changed the course of England’s history, as well as influencing two famous philosophical men. Thomas Hobbes, author of Leviathan, and John Locke, author of Second Treatise on Civil Government, drew on their experiences of England’s monarchical turmoil to conceive very different political theories. Both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were prominent political philosophers in the…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Locke (1632-1704) was an English philosopher who wrote many works, including Two Treatises of Government (1690). He supported democracy and believed that everyone was born with certain individual rights. He argued that these natural rights (life, liberty, and property) were not given by government or given by God and cannot be taken away by government. He also believed that there was a social contract between a government and its people. People agree to obey government as long as it defends their natural rights and people have the right to overthrow an unjust government.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays