The article ”The Ideas Shaping a New India” was published in the reputable newspaper, The New York Times on January 14, 2011. The article is written by The New York Times journalist Anand Giridharadas. Giridharadas is rooted in India and has also lived there himself.
In the article Giridharadas states that India like a few other countries have more than one birth date. Furthermore, he seeks to identify and pass on five central ideas, which have helped India’s development.
The language of the article is readily accessible for the common reader. This is probably due to the fact that the intention of the author is to spread the message that India is a country in rapid progress, which could be because of his personal interest in the matter. Therefore it is advantageous to make the article comprehensible for most social classes.
Owing to the fact that the article is written by one single person it can be argued that it will always contain a certain amount of subjectivity. This argument is additionally confirmed in a statement by the author: “Here, based on my own years of traveling in and reporting on the country…” (p. 1, ll. 15-16). Standing alone this sort of journalism would be weak and unreliable, but Giridharadas fortunately sees to make use of references to factual statements concerning the years of certain events and the like in order to consolidate the reliability of the text. Due to the aforementioned circumstances it can therefore be argued that the author utilizes the appeal forms logos and ethos to his advantage. Ethos is contributing to his trustworthiness because of his own traveling in India and logos is strengthening the feel of objectivity in the article.
However, there is a considerable factor, which is weakening the article as a whole. “A rising group of young Indians conceives of class very differently; not as a fixed identity, but as a transient situation, and a situation that can change” (p. 1, ll. 32-34). The