Preview

The Ignored Lesson of Anne Frank

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
304 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Ignored Lesson of Anne Frank
Do we as a wealthy nation have a responsibility to help alleviate the suffering that is occurring in impoverished nations?
- If not, why not?
- If so, what is the basis of that obligation?
Either way, make sure you address several of the issue brought up by Singer, Pogge, Harding and Sen.
Answer:
I like many people believe that the people of wealthy nations have a moral responsibility to help poor nations. When I was doing some research on this subject, I learned some people have said that all people have a moral responsibility to help people in harm’s way and when doing so would not cause harm to them. And as a person I do know that suffering and death from starvation are both considered harmful things. I do also see that it is very clear that small financial sacrifices on the part of people from wealthy nations can prevent massive amounts of suffering and death from starvation just by helping in small ways. So from my point of view and research I do now believe that people in a wealthy nation have at least some moral responsibility to help poor nations. I also see that Singers argument does add up with my research so I do agree with Singers argument as well.
Singer asks us to consider this argument. Suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad. “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it.. It is in our power to prevent suffering and death by giving money to causes such as famine relief. Therefore, we have a moral obligation to give money to causes such as famine relief. We should give and it is wrong not to give.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annelies Marie Frank born June 12, 1929 in Germany is known though the world for her diary, Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl. A Young Jewish girl who wrote about how her family was hiding for two years during the German occupation of the Netherlands which was ended published by her father.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anne and Margot were sent to the same camp while her mother and father were sent elsewhere. Years later, her father; Otto Frank being the only remaining Frank discovered Anne’s diary and the depth of her thoughts, ambitions, dreams, and intelligence which even he was shocked to discover. Anne Frank often represents the many people who died during the Holocaust, showing people that these victims were actual humans and it really happened. This gave her the title, “The Face of the Holocaust”.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was evident that Anne Frank was a young girl who was in hiding due to war and hoping to make it out.…

    • 83 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought that you are happier than many children in the world? On the other hand, they do not have enough good conditions to live and develop themselves, including poverty. How will they struggle for their lives with their small hands? They probably need our help to rescue them out of danger. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, which is written by Peter Singer, is a solution to save children's lives. Singer persuades the reader to participate in helping children who lack food, get many diseases, and do not have good living conditions. His argument is that all of us should contribute to saving the children’s lives According to “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, this solution totally has the ability to be done by our help; however, I am not completely persuaded that I will help children by following Single’s solution.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article on famine, affluence, and morality, morally Peter Singer states that people who live in rich countries are morally obligated to ease the burden of famine and overpopulation for poorer countries. Singer states that rich countries can alleviate unnecessary suffering and death in poor countries by giving famine relief, and at the cost of a “morally insignificant” lessening of standard of living for the rich country. Singer also notes that this giving of famine relief should not only occur during dire emergency situations, but on a long-term basis, as well. Singer presents his justification for his reasoning in the form of an anecdote: if you were to walk by a pond where a small toddler was drowning it would be morally wrong to not…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer's position on our moral obligation to aid the world's poor is characteristically frank and rests on three premises. The first premise states that ‘if we can prevent something bad without sacrificing something significant, we ought to do it.’ The second premise simply declares that ‘extreme poverty is bad’. Finally, the third premise claims that ‘there is some extreme poverty we can prevent without sacrificing anything of comparable moral significance.’ Ultimately, the sum of the premises’ yield the conclusion that ‘we ought to prevent some extreme poverty.’ The premises are wisely formulated; it’s put forth in a fashion that…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Is Wrong

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe that we are morally free to live the life we want and pursue our own interests, at least to some extent, and this entails that we are morally permitted to dedicate our energy, time, and capital to activates that don’t involve any direct impact on famine relief or similar causes.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is an irrefutable fact that we should help each other. However sometimes help to others poses some danger to either us or others. In Peter Singer's essay "Famine Affluence, and Morality" Peter Singer argues that we ought, morally, to prevent starvation due to famine. Singer begins by saying that assistance has been inadequate as richer countries prioritize development above preventing starvation. Singer then states that "suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad" (404) and assumes that it is uncontroversial enough to be accepted without justification. He then next raises the linked premise that we morally ought to prevent something 'bad' from happening as long as we have the means and it does not entail compromising on anything of 'comparable moral significance', using the analogy of a drowning child and hence assuming the principle _of "_universalizability" (405). As Singer writes, he attempts to justify why he feels that it is within our means to do so without sacrificing anything morally significant, and concludes that we hence morally ought to prevent starvation due to famine.…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A massive Genocide. Families torn part. Homes destroyed. The Holocaust was a traumatic, appalling experience where nearly 11 million people were brutally murdered. Ruling from 1933 to 1945, the Nazis, led by Adolf Hitler, attempted to rid themselves of all those they deemed inferior or marginalized groups such as the Jews. However, who should take the blame for this horrific event? The government or the people? Source A, an excerpt from The Diary of Anne Frank, explains how the many people were deported out of the country by the Gestapo. Source B, an info graphic, explains the necessary components for a holocaust. Source C, a poem by Pastor Neimoller, explains how nobody stood up for each other, and Source D, an allegory, relates to Nazi Germany.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Health Car Act

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," by Peter Singer, he is addressing the subject of charity, morality in general, and giving us a different insight in the thoughts about famine relief. Singer points out some interesting things in his article. I do agree that people, espeically the rich, should do more than what most of them actually do. This paper will explain Singer 's goal, his counter arguments, his concept of marginal utility, and the ideas of charity and duty.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, religious believers themselves shouldn’t just be the only ones who should show more compassion. In order to help the poor, everyone in the world should help in different ways (e.g. donating to charity). God has given us free will, so it’s the religious believers’ choice if he or she wants to show more compassion to the poor or not. The religious believer may also be in a difficult position themselves where they are unable to contribute to helping the poor.…

    • 280 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Economic Justice for All

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * From an economic standpoint, do you feel all members of society have a special obligation to the poor and weak?…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Singer, believes that people who are wealthy, and live a luxurious lifestyle should donate their money to overseas aid organizations, and although Singer believes “the formula is simple”, I disagree. When Singer states that giving away money is an easy thing task, I believe that even for the prosperous it is not. Not for the fact that they don't have the money, but for the fact that the need for food and medicine is far too great, and dispersed around the world that not everyone would receive this aid.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics