The proponents of classical theories on international free trade predict that free trade based on competitive advantage leads to mutual benefits to the trading partners; whereas, opponents of free trade insist on protectionism to secure fairness, Hill. (2005). There are a number of empirical evidences supporting both ideals of free trade and the positions of the opponents.
Based on the above approaches to trade liberalization , chapter two will present the overall principles and arguments related to trade liberalization, followed by benefits and impacts of trade liberalization on income distribution, employment opportunity, and environmental issues focusing on textile and garment sector. Here, particular attention will be devoted to current and potential impacts of trade liberalization on Ethiopian textile and garment industry.
The third chapter of the paper deals with research methodology i.e., data collection techniques, source of data, and tools to analyze and present the findings to reveal whether general assumption held on free trade is consistent with the current business practices, particularly in Ethiopian textile and garment sector.
1.1. Background
In a very general term, Trade liberalization assumed to improve global efficiency in resource allocation. It encourages international competition and cooperation to exchange goods and technological know-how, and etc.
On the other hand, there are also evidences indicating the negative impacts of trade liberalization particularly in least developing countries, inducing income inequalities, job loses and decline of firms.
Textile and garment industry is one of the sectors that were challenged by trade liberalization after the removal of quota on textile products. The impacts of trade liberalization on Ethiopian Textile and garment sector appears to be consistent with some other African countries due to similar constraints in productivity and other factors
Bibliography: Belay.F. (2007), ‛ Trade liberalization, poverty and inequality in Ethiopia’: available: http://www.pep-net.org/fileadmin/medias/pdf/files_events/Fekadu-pa.pdf:: accessed: 20/02/03 Charles W.C.Hill. (2005) (ed), International Business: Competing in the global Market Place, TATA McGraw-Hill, India, New Delhi Czinkota R., A.Ronkainen EIA, report, (1992 to 2007),’ The performance report of Ethiopian Textile and Garment Industry Available: http://www.google.com : accessed: 20/02/2010 Flatters.F Godnez. L (nd) ‘Risks to the Mexican textile industry from trade liberalization effect of after the end of MFA’ Hill and Jain, (2009) (ed.), International Business: Competing in the global Market Herbert.J. (2006), ‛the textile and clothing industry in South Africa’: the future of the textile and clothing in Sub-Saharan Africa Kenji F Krugman and obstefeld, (2009), international economics: Theory and practice, Dorling Kindersley, India New Delhi Mark Weisbrot Sloper and Samuelson-(2005): ‛ Trade liberalization and wage inequality’: Available: http://www.google.com accessed: 18/02/2010 Stephan and et al Raphael and Tkehoe. (Oct.2003), ‛ new trade theory’: available: http://www.econ.umn.edu/.pdf : accessed: 20/02/2010 Teigist. L. (2006), United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: Case study on Ethiopia: Available: http://www.google.com : accessed: 20/02/2010 Tupy.L UNITED NATIONS (2005), ‛The Removal of Textiles and Clothing Quotas’: available: http://www.unctad.org.pdf: accessed on: 18/02/2010 Yamagata