The traditional art that are properly inherited and protected could help enhance the national identity of a nation. Therefore, with government funding, these kinds of art, such as calligraphy and Beijing Opera, would be further propagated and pass down to the future generation. Some may argue that it is unnecessary to offer financial support to the artists who devote to the kind traditional art that is already popular. However, a thriving traditional art could become an advertisement of a nation and its culture to the universe. On the other hand, for the endangered traditional art, funding and supporting from the government are extremely important, since they may wither out with the development of the modern society. While, even though the fading of these heritage art could be due to not matching the demanding of the society, the financial supporting are still needed for they could derive from a minority culture which is treasured by a few …show more content…
Many argue that for the artists who create critical art, especially these reveal the dark side of the society or satirize the present politics, would tend to comply with the inclination of the government who offers them financial aid. As a result, only the positive comment would be kept in their work, and, therefore, art would lose its dependency. Moreover, many masterpieces are derived from the desire of expression strong feelings, such as painful, hopeless, or angry; once the government begins to fund their art, the motivation of their creations are likely to shift to financial need which lead to the violation of the art integrity. Furthermore, some who does not have deep attainment on art may portent to be a reputable artist in order to get money. However, funding could be used to collect and study the critical works from the past. Since critical art, such as caricature, usually reflects the negative side of the society, these collected works could trigger people to learn from the