Preview

The Importance Of Truth In Sentencing

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
96 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Importance Of Truth In Sentencing
Such sentencing laws include three-strike laws and truth-in-sentencing. Three-strike laws force sentences of twenty five years to life for people who commit three or more felonies.The truth-in-sentencing law mandates that prisoners serve most or all of their time (Whitehead). Such laws keep more people in prison for longer amounts of time. These laws result in overcrowded prisons and more prisoners in the U.S. than in any other country in the world. Although China has roughly 1 billion more people, America has more prisoners. Just since the 1970’s, the number of prisoners in America has increased drastically.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three Strikes Law Research Paper
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Three Strikes Law Research Paper

    Beginning in the early 1990s, states began to enact mandatory sentencing laws for repeat criminal offenders. These statutes came to be known as "three strikes laws," because they were invoked when offenders committed their third offense. By 2003 over half the states and the federal government had enacted three strikes laws. The belief behind the laws was that getting career criminals off the streets was good public policy. However, incarceration of three strikes inmates for 25 years to life would drive up correctional costs. The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld three strikes laws and has rejected…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Fallacy of Three Strikes Laws
    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Fallacy of Three Strikes Laws

    3 Strikes laws demand double the standard prison term for a second felony conviction, and mandatory sentences of 25 years to life for a 3rd conviction. For an example of this law in action, lets look at a few hypothetical criminals. Our first villain, lets call him Jerry, is an 18 year old caucasian male from Olympia. He is convicted of armed robbery after holding up a convenience store. After agreeing to a plea bargain, Jerry is sentenced to 2 years in state prison and 3 years probation. Most would agree this is a fair sentence. 6 years later, Jerry is charged with 2nd degree assault after breaking another mans jaw in a fight at a minor league baseball game in Tacoma. His friend Tom is also charged with 2nd degree assault after hitting an innocent bystander with a beer bottle during the same fight. Tom receives a 3 year sentence, followed by a years probation. After a jury trial, Jerry is sentenced to 8 years in prison for the same crime. Why, you may ask. The answer is simple. 3 strikes laws demand that because Jerry has a previous felony conviction, although more than half a decade previous and completely unrelated, he is subject to double the standard sentence for his “2nd Strike”.…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law Research Paper
    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Three Strikes Law Research Paper

    “Three strikes and you’re out”. This is the all too familiar term we are used to hearing in baseball and in the rules of the law in some states. Most heard of in California. Three strikes sentencing were adopted in 1994. It imposed longer prison sentences for repeat offenders. The law requires a person who is convicted of a felony and who previously has been convicted of one or more violent and/or serious felonies. The main feature of the Three Strikes law is the imposition of a life sentence for any felony conviction, no matter how minor, if the defendant has two prior "serious" felony convictions. "Serious" felonies are defined by the California Penal Code and range from murder and rape to non-confrontational residential burglary and purse-snatching.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arguments Against Three Strikes
    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Arguments Against Three Strikes

    This week we were able to read two articles that went along with our lecture. The first article, "Three Strikes and You're Out: California's new mandatory sentencing law on serious crime rates", by Stolzenberg and D'Alessio. This article looked at information gathered from cities where the three strikes law was mandated. The research looked at monthly data and found that the three strikes law had no effect on recidivism or crime rates. Personally, though some may agree with the three strikes law, I find it in some circumstances to be unjust. For starters, I feel as though this law does not allow the judge to fully review the case of an offender who has reached their third strike. The reason for this is that each crime committed is different…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Parole and Truth in Sentencing Paper Essay Example
    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Parole and Truth in Sentencing Paper Essay Example

    Before parole becomes an option to an offender or an offender remains on parole, there are conditions and concepts and goals that must be practiced or met. Typical conditions influence parole as the inmate is released from prison. Truth-in-sentencing laws have goals in relations to parole.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Strike Law: Criminal Justice In The 21st Century
    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Three Strike Law: Criminal Justice In The 21st Century

    The three strike law became very popular in the 1990s. These statutes are enacted by state government and require the state court to hand down a mandatory and extended sentence to a repeat offender that has committed two or more previous offences. Between 1993 and 1995, 26 states and the federal government passed three strikes laws. The lawmakers were forced to take a second look at the punishment of repeat offenders after the kidnapping and murder of 12-year-old Polly…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three Strikes Law
    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Three Strikes Law

    The purpose of the “three strike” law against offenders was originally to help reduce the number of criminals who were running around free but what it had come down to was costing tax payers more than what they had bargained for. More than 57% of offenders in California who are placed in prison for the “three strike” law were typically arrested for nonviolent offenses such as drug violations and burglary. More serious offenders who had committed more serious violent crimes were getting of scotch free if it had been their 1st or 2nd offense. 1 in 4 prisoners or 42,000 inmates are serving time in California prisons were serving life terms of 25 years to life after being placed in the prison system against the “three strikes” law. Inmates serving time increased the cost to house them in the prison systems under this law by $8.1 billion with $4.7 billion of that amount being used to house nonviolent offenders. Offenders who were placed in the prison system by the “three strike” law committing nonviolent offenses such as drug related crimes and burglary outnumbered the total number of offenders placed who had committed more serious offenses such as rape, assault or murder. Voters are the only people who are able to repeal this law but what would be left for the inmates who are already placed in prison systems against the “three strike”…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Three Strikes Law Thesis
    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Three Strikes Law Thesis

    The American public is alarmed about crime, and with good reason. Our crime rate is unacceptably high, and many Americans feel like prisoners in their own homes, afraid to venture out for fear of becoming another statistic. Nation-wide attention was focused on so-called three-strike laws in 1994 when California voters approved an initiative mandating prison terms of 25-years-to-life for defendants convicted of a third felony. The California law also doubles minimum terms for second time offenders. The prison population has grown so much that most are already filled beyond capacity and many more prisons need…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Your Out
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Three Strikes Your Out

    The state of California in 1994 passed the “Three Strikes and Your Out” law. This law sentences a third offence felony offender to a mandatory 25-years to life sentence. Although crime rate have dropped in California there are those opponents to the law who feel in certain cases that the sentencing is too harsh.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes Law
    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Three Strikes Law

    Begun in the 1990s, the Three Strikes Laws are a category of statutes which were enacted in the United States by certain state governments. These laws were enacted to mandate longer periods of imprisonment for persons convicted of a felony on three or more separate offenses. The term is used similar the three strikes and you’re out rule in baseball. This could also be described, as such statutes are most often known, officially as mandatory sentencing laws.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Three Strikes
    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Three Strikes

    In 1991 the “tough on crime” Governor Pete Wilson was elected. Wilson was a staunch supporter of the popular but controversial “Three Strikes” law. Two years into Governor Wilson’s first term, the people of California already sickened by public safety issues, were further outraged when a parolee abducted and murdered Polly Klaas. Polly’s father Mark Klaas lobbied diligently for passing the “Three Strikes” law, in which an individual with a prior serious or violent felony conviction, would a receive 25 to life sentence if convicted for any two non violent felonies. Several parts of the law are little known to the public. If you have one serious or violent felony, and you are convicted…

    • 2374 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Parole and Truth in Sentencing
    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Parole and Truth in Sentencing

    To understand parole one needs to know what parole is and what it means. Parole is the status and early release of a convicted offender who has been conditionally releases from prison by a paroling authority before his or her sentence is expired. Parole and Probation have similar conditions. While an offender is on parole they have certain rules they need to follow. There is another form of parole which is Federal parole. Federal parole was determined by the Parole Board under the United Stated Parole Commission. Federal parole was changed after the Sentencing Reform Act. The Sentencing Reform Act was a part of the U.S. Federal statute that was intended to increase the consistency in the United States federal sentencing; this abolished federal parole all together. Parole was introduced by Brockway Zebulon in 1876 as a way to reduce jail overcrowding and as a way to rehabilitate offenders by encouraging them to win back their freedom with good behaviors. The role of parole was to reduce prison terms based on good behavior. Another role of probation was to supervise the convicted after being granted parole and grant freedom to those who had uncertain sentences. The reduction of jail terms after good and responsible behavior use to reduce indeterminate sentences. “There are 25 percent of inmates who are freed from prison are still paroled by the paroling authority, such as a parole board” (Schmalleger, F).…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Parole and Truth in Sentencing
    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Parole and Truth in Sentencing

    When an inmate is released from prison on parole there are certain conditions that they have to follow such as not leaving the state and they have to obey extradition request from other jurisdictions. (Schmalleger, 2011). Once the inmate is placed on parole they are assigned a parole officer that they to visit on a regular basis and the parole officer will visit them and these visits will be at random. The parolees can be visited at home; work, and school, and they are also subjected to random drug and alcohol testing because as a condition of their parole they are not to use either. Even if a parolee is not using drugs and alcohol and is at home when the parole officer comes their parole can still be revocated if they have not found employment, which is a condition of parole within 30 days.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAIRDMCCALPINETRUTHINSENTENCINGDEBATE
    • 771 Words
    • 2 Pages

    LAIRDMCCALPINETRUTHINSENTENCINGDEBATE

    Laird: Truth in sentencing laws are present to reduce the possibility of early release from incarceration. The offender must carry out a significant amount of the sentence brought down by the court before being considered for release, most times this is no less than eighty-five percent. Truth in sentencing laws prohibit the previous policies that reduced the time that the criminal served such as good time, earned-time and parole board release. Each state is different with the upholding of the truth in sentencing laws. Before laws were replaced, a convicted criminal never really served their entire prison sentence, but instead they would be released early for good behavior or because of overcrowding in the prison (Curtiss, n.d.). The truth in sentencing laws were put into place to deter crime because most criminals understand if they were convicted then they would have to serve most of their sentence in prison. No more leniency is to be given. Before truth in sentencing laws the parole board had the power to release a prisoner before their sentence was completed. The laws took that empowerment away from the parole board and replaced it with a sentencing judge. “The public and victims of crime have the right to know exactly what amount of prison time has been imposed, that survivors of a violent crime have a right to know how long the criminal will be in jail” (Curtiss, n.d.). Population of the prison facilities have gone up considerably, due to the laws are about punishment, not rehabilitation. The public is safer without the criminals on the streets re-offending. With harsher sentencing for the offenders under the truth in sentencing laws, once an offender is released from prison it deters them away from doing any other criminals acts for the fear of being incarcerated even longer. Ditton (1999), “As the number of offenders…

    • 771 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Three Strikes Law
    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Three Strikes Law

    California then followed in 1994, and by 1996, 23 other states and the federal government enacted similar laws. However, California and Georgia are the only two states that have applied the legislation with any consistency. “As of mid-year 1998, Georgia sentenced almost 2,000 offenders under one and two strike provisions, and California more than 40,000 under two and three strike provisions” (Kovandzic, et al., 2004). There was a political push for this law because in the public’s view, they believed that many offenders were receiving shorter sentences than they previously had and prisons were being used as revolving doors. However, offenders were serving longer terms and incarceration rates had…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics