As stated earlier, the 2004-2005 survey conducted by the Wisconsin DNR showed that 52 percent of Wisconsin citizens do not support compensation for hounds, yet the money from these citizens is still used to provide compensation to the hunter. The same survey discovered that 81 percent of landowners that live near wolf packs would participate in a program in which they are given a monetary incentive to protect wolves, which would offset the risks they face and compensate them for any potential animal losses. This proves that wolves are not the problem; the problem is how the compensation is funded and handled. During the 2012 Wisconsin wolf hunting season, the compensation for dog depredations was provided through wolf application fees instead of taxpayer dollars. Managing the wolf population not only involves hunting, but also dealing with the consequences and side effects of having a wolf population in the state of Wisconsin. The money that was earned from wolf hunting application fees during 2012 was used directly to compensate hunters for wolves that caused them problems, which was a much more beneficial management…
In recent years, we have seen the ecosystem flourish due to a successful reintroduction of wolves into Yellowstone National Park. We have seen a steady decrease in elk population, which in turn helped create a successful trophic cascade. Looking at graphs we can see that the wolf reintroduction has done its job, and we see a more than 50% decrease in population of elk. But what could happen if the wolf population doubled. We could see a total extermination of elk from Yellowstone and a decrease in visitors to Yellowstone, but in turn we could see in increase in the population of wolves, water animals, birds, and bears.…
Do you know how many gray wolves are left in North Dakota? There is no actual total because there are so few packs of gray wolves left. The gray wolf has resulted in a threatened species because predator-control is targeting them and destroying their habitat. Because they are supposedly killing too many livestock, predator-control is aiming towards gray wolves. The gray wolf is a threatened mammal in North Dakota. It is not commonly seen, but is usually mistaken for a coyote. They are being threatened all around North Dakota. Gray wolves appear in the state occasionally. As of 2013, it was arranged for the gray wolf to possibly be removed from the Endangered Species list. Currently, the population has rebounded since 1973 and is questionable…
One of the threats is to the wolves food supply. Another threat is the building of roads and pipelines may clear parts of their natural habitat, displacing and destroying its prey.…
“Go back to California!”, is just one of the many things supporters of the Mexican Gray Wolf reintroduction program were hearing at a meeting about “predators” in Alpine this February. Over three hundred people were in attendance and only a handful of people were supporters of these dog sized predators. They sat quietly listening to everyone bash the most endangered mammal in North America (Corrigan). The Mexican Gray Wolf is about the size of a German Shepherd, four to five feet long and seventy to ninety pounds. Up until recently they only existed in zoos but with the Mexican Wolf Reintroduction project and the help of United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Arizona Game and Fish, White Mountain Apache Tribe, United States Department of Agriculture(USDA), animal and plant health inspection service, wildlife…
The Yosemite national park has a problem with over grazing of kaibab in the park and will cause over population and starvation and what the Grand Canyon national preserve game started to release wolfs into the park but near by farmers are out raged, because these wolves are killing their live stock. The farmers want the government to allow them to protect themselves from the wolves but the wolves are endangered species this will kill of this species for ever. With this reasons these could help this problem.…
Another reason they should not be reintroduced is they are not the natural grey wolves of the surrounding ecosystem. The wolves that were reintroduced were Canadian wolves. They are much larger and stronger then the American ones. Since they are bigger in the size it means they eat more and have an advantage over the prey. A perfect example is a case study that happened in 1960. Four Canadian wolves were introduced to Coronation Island for the purpose of reducing the over population of black-tail deer. Those wolves however were not managed and soon reproduced to thirteen and quickly depleted the deer population.…
The purpose of this memo is to explain the causes of extinction within the Red wolf population and the Black bear population. The topics chosen explain how this issue came about, what factors created, and provided some solutions on how to prevent it and keep these endangered species’ population thriving. There were several ways the black bear and red wolf came to the brink of extinction and these article provide multiple solutions to sustain and endangered species.…
The problem with offering money is that some ranchers have accepted it, but used that money to pay hunters to kill as many wolves as possible (nytimes, 2011). Ranchers do not believe that it is necessary to keep wolf populations as high as they are (nytimes, 2011). The fourth article discussed how the court was going to uphold Congress’s act to remove the wolf from the endangered species list (latimes, 2012). The main viewpoints are the agencies that support Congress’s decision to take the wolf off the list versus the environmental groups (latimes, 2012). The environmental groups were arguing that the rider that Congress issued in 2011 was a violation of the separation of powers doctrine (latimes, 2012). However, it was revealed that the separation of powers doctrine was not violated and that states should still get the rights to determine wolf population numbers (latimes, 2012). In the fifth article, state governments versus environmental groups are the main viewpoints (nytimes, 2013). State governments believe that they are the most competent to make decisions about the future of wolves (nytimes, 2013). Reports indicate that wolf populations remain…
The reality is that the current level of development of the nations that occupied North America will be the first obstacle in the re-introduction of bigger mammals. The reintroduction of many species worldwide has been in some areas a complete success and the opposite in others. Once an organism disappear from an ecosystem, it creates the opportunity for other organism to thrive and overtime nature takes his course and these organism adapt to the changes in their environment. While is not doubt that rewilding of North America will be beneficial for many species, it also will be the end for others, however nature will recover and adapt to these changes. The main obstacle for the rewilding of North America is the humans.…
Wolves and humans have been coexisting for hundreds of years. Before Europeans conquered our vast country, wolves held a very esteemed place in Native American culture, as they were vital to forest ecosystems, and were often believed to be spiritual beings in many tribes (kidsplanet 1). As much as they were honored in tribal cultures, others feared them. Children’s fables often described them as “the big bad wolf” in stories such as Little Red Riding hood and The Three Little Pigs (kidsplanet 1). Settlers saw wolves in this way because they were a sort of competition, dwindling stock and wild game numbers (kidsplanet 1). Even into the 20th century, the belief that wolves were still a threat to human safety continued despite documentation to the contrary, and by the 1970s, the lower forty eight states had wolf populations less than three percent of their historical range, about 500 to 1,000 wolves (kidsplanet 1). In a book written by Bruce Hampton called The Great American Wolf, he states,…
Wolf reintroduction is only considered where large tracts of suitable wilderness still exist and where certain prey species are abundant enough to support a predetermined wolf population. The five last known wild Mexican grey wolves were captured in 1980 in accordance with an agreement between the United States and Mexico intended to save the critically endangered subspecies. Since then, a comprehensive captive breeding program has brought Mexican wolves back from the brink. Currently, there are 300 captive Mexican wolves taking part in the program. The ultimate goal for these wolves, however, is to reintroduce them to areas of their former range. In March 1998, this reintroduction campaign began with the releasing of three packs into the Apache-Sit greaves National Forest in Arizona. Today, there may be up to 50 wild Mexican wolves in Arizona and New Mexico. The final goal for Mexican wolf recovery is a wild, self-sustaining population of at least 100…
In addition to eliminating weak members of elk herds, hence strengthening the heard as a whole, wolves keep herds on the move and maintain the balance of the herd in reform to the fragile wilderness. In moving the herd frequently, wolves preserve groves of aspens and other smooth-barked trees, improving the stability of the ground and preventing damaging erosion, especially near river and stream banks essential for the survival of fish, beavers, and even aquatic-oriented birds. An imbalance in the wolf population has repercussions on the entire ecosystem, ranging from the more easily seen populations of elk to the more blurred effects on fish and expanding even further to animals who depend on fish, ultimately affecting even markets in our economy. This “trophic cascade,” named by biologists and ecologists, have a wide array of repercussions which can occasionally be irreversible. Entire populations can easily be wiped clear from existence, giving way to a devastating mudslide of devastation and a whole new era of demanding complications. In a field study, Ecologist William Ripple and his Oregon State University colleague Robert Beschta reported that “within three years after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park elk populations fell, pockets of trees and shrubs began rebounding. Beavers returned, coyote numbers dropped and habitat flourished for fish and birds.” And yet, people…
The wolf is truly a special animal. As the most widely distributed of all land mammals, the wolf, formally the gray wolf (Canis lupus), is also one of the most adaptable. It inhabits all the vegetation types of the Northern Hemisphere and preys on all the large mammals living there. It also feeds on all the other animals in its environment, scavenges, and can even eat fruits and berries. Wolves frequent forests and prairies, tundra, barren ground, mountains, deserts, and swamps. Some wolves even visit large cities, and, of course, the wolf's domesticated version, the dog, thrives in urban environments.…
You ever wonder how the Grey wolf acts and dose to survive in the wild compared to the Grey wolf in captivity. The Grey wolf in captivity gets feed on a regular basis and has shelter made for them by humans. There is so much a Grey wolf in the wild has to do to survive by getting its own food to making its own shelter. Even the dangers they face in the wild such as other animals and harsh weather conditions. This is just what they have to do to survive.…