Preview

The Indian Removal Act

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1618 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Indian Removal Act
Question 1 Indian Removal
The Indian Removal Act was the forced relocation of Indian Tribes from their homelands to federal lands further West. The people of the South supported this Act because they wanted to gain the fertile Indian lands.
A type of Indian resistance would be that they attempted to adopt “white” practices, like large farms and even owning slaves. Another type of Indian resistance would be going to war. The First Seminole War, for example, tried fighting against the Americans for their land. They had help from the fugitive slaves that they were harboring.
The Cherokee attempted to write a constitution that declared themselves as a sovereign nation. This was unsuccessful because the Supreme Court ruled against them. Question
…show more content…

Many were punished for speaking out against the government, which was prohibited as a part of these laws. Question 10 Virginia and Kentucky Resolution
One reason the Republicans passed the Virginia and Kentucky Resolution was to fight against the Alien and Sedition Acts. This Resolution stated that people had the right to speak out against unconstitutional doings by the government, which the Alien and Sedition Acts prohibited.
A second reason for passing the Resolution was to try and strengthen individual states’ rights. This brought up the topic of nullification alot; if a state found a law unconstitutional, then nullification was the solution to it.
The relevance to the Constitutional debate of the Resolution is because of the fact that it makes it seem as if the nation is not one whole nation, but many separate states. This led many people to wonder whether this Resolution was constitutional or not. Question 11 Missouri Compromise of
…show more content…

This helped both the US and Europe, because it prevented anyone from Europe from leaving and establishing land in North America.
This was important to US history because it led to the belief of Manifest Destiny, which is the belief that the US has the right and the power to establish a country out of the entirety of North America. This was significant because it led to many things, such as forced Indian Removal and annexing Texas. Question 13 Marbury v. Madison
One aspect to this case would be that it was the first one in history to use “judicial review.” This allowed courts to void acts from Congress that they deemed unconstitutional.
A second aspect to this case would be that John Adams appointed many family and friends government jobs with commission, but refused to send out these commissions. William Marbury took it to court, which led to this case.
The importance of Marshal’s ruling in this case is that it led to making the Supreme Court a separate entity from the Executive Branch. It also allowed for the Supreme Court to have just as much power as the Executive


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alfonso Lopez Case Summary

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Perhaps one of the most seminal Supreme Court decisions was the case of United States v. Alfonso Lopez (1995). After nearly a half-century of decisions by the Court in favor of expanded federal power via the Constitution’s Interstate Commerce Clause, the Justices issued a ruling limiting the reach of Congress, signaling a seismic shift on the Court’s interpretation of the Clause. The Court’s decision also sent a strong statement to Congress regarding the legislative body’s jurisdiction over a bevy of activities with a nexus to interstate commerce — from gun control to environmental protection to education.…

    • 1589 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1803, a single case managed to change how America's government would be run forever. In John Adams' last few days as president, he appointed a small group of Federalists into power. When Thomas Jefferson was elected into office, and he told James Madison to not bring the commissions to an appointed “midnight judge” named William Marbury. This gave the newly appointed Chief Justice, John Marshall, a great opportunity to spread his Federalist influence deeper into the American government. When Marbury found out that his commission was being held back by Madison, he sued for its delivery.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hall, Kermit L, eds. The Oxford guide to United States Supreme Court decisions New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.…

    • 2104 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    cases in history. It was a case that was derived on federal power. During this case, the Supreme…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the groundbreaking case Gideon vs. Wainwright we are given a prime example of a Supreme Court case and its impact on federalism. Gideon was accused of felony burglary charges after an eyewitness placed him at the scene of a robbery. Although there was no evidence of him committing the crime, police arrested him and charged him with the theft based solely on an eye witness report. The sequences of events that would follow would change the way states were ordered to provide due process and create a fair and balanced trial for all felony trials.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were significance of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison. The Marbury v. Madison case created the judicial review. In the judicial review, Chief Justice John Marshall extended the power of the Supreme Court. He set out three principles. The first principle was that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The second principle was when a conflict emerges between the Constitution and any other law the Constitution must be followed. The final principle was that the Judicial branch has a duty to approve the Constitution. The powers of judicial review served as an important check on the legislative (law making) branch. The courts must be able to cancel any unconstitutional laws. The Marbury v. Madison case started when John Adams…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision, in 1859, sided with federal law stating that states do not have the ability to overrule federal law; that the Constitution was written as the supreme law of the land. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney’s decision denied the right of state’s courts to interfere in federal cases, prohibited states from releasing federal prisoners on a writ of habeas corpus, and upheld constitutionality of the Fugitive Slave Act.3 Taney cited in his decision, “To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper to carry into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.”4 This is important because it limited the rights of the state governments. Taney’s decision strengthened the federal government and weakened the state governments. His decision also strengthened the judicial branch further following in the footsteps of John…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions (or Resolves) were important political statements in favor of states' rights written secretly by Vice President Thomas Jefferson (who would later become president) and James Madison in 1798. They were passed by the two states in opposition to the federal Alien and Sedition Acts. Though often mentioned as a pair in modern historical discussions, they were actually two separate documents. The Kentucky Resolutions were written by Jefferson and passed by the state legislature on November 16, 1798, with one more being passed the following year on December 3, 1799. The Virginia Resolutions were written by Madison and passed by the state legislature on December 24, 1798. Jefferson and Madison collaborated on the writing of the two documents, but their authorship was not known for many years. The resolutions attacked the Sedition Acts, which extended the powers of the federal government over individuals inside the states. The resolutions declared that the Constitution was a "compact." That is, it was an agreement among the states. The federal government had no right to exercise powers not specifically delegated to it; should the federal government assume such powers, its acts under them would be void. Thus it was the right of the states to decide as to the constitutionality of such laws passed by…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marbury Vs. Madision

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With the Marbury v. Madison case, Marshall’s powerful opinion was based on three propositions. One, the Constitution is by it’s own terms, the supreme law of the land. Two, all the legislative acts and other actions of government are subordinate to the supreme law and cannot be allowed to conflict with it. Three, the judges are sworn to enforce the provisions of the Constitution, and therefore must refuse to enforce any government action they find to be in conflict with it. In this decision Chief Justice Marshall claimed for the Supreme Court the right to declare acts of…

    • 549 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the United States Chief Justice, John Marshall changed several governmental standards. These standards include the change in the judicial system and strengthening the central government. “As man whose political doctrines led always…to strengthen government at the expense of the people,” this quote states that Marshall’s goal was only to improve the federal government at the expense of the states. Marshall had served at Valley Forge and had been impressed with the drawbacks of no central authority, thus he became a lifelong Federalist, committed to strengthening the power of the federal government. His theory of putting the central government over the states is a corrupt and damaging idea that will lead to future events, such as Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, Cohens v. Virginia, and Gibbons v. Ogden. The power of the federal government should be left in the hands of the states.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans broke treaties and cheated the Indians in deals, the Americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first. The had a peaceful life, then the Americans came in and messed it…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many opposed the growth of America and attempted to keep Americans boxed in east of the Mississippi River. Prior to becoming a part of America, the Louisiana Purchase was used as a tool to halt the expansion of the United States of America. Without the insight of Thomas Jefferson, the greed of Napoleon Bonaparte, and a Revolution in Sainte-Domingue the deal may never have happened. Thanks to these events America was able to almost double the amount of land that it owned and paved the way for expansion into the west.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    think it was a necessary event that helped better establish the United States as a nation…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays