Preview

The Influence Of Federalism In Congress

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
318 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Influence Of Federalism In Congress
Federalism played a crucial part in curtailing government action during the Jacksonian era. Around that time, a states’ right coalition developed in Congress, a group of individuals supporting greater rights for the state government. Members of the states’ right coalition, often an appointed senator, used the coalition group to safeguard the power they held in their state. This particularly benefited Southern states that wanted to maintain the institution of slavery. The states’ right coalition dominated congress, their influence in congress affected the presidential elections and forced a nationalistic interpretation of the Constitution. And one of the most noticeable ways that they did this was with cases concerning the commerce clause. The
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    HIS 301 UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Complete Class Includes All DQs Individual and Team Assignments UOP
    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages

    HIS 301 UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Complete Class Includes All DQs Individual and Team Assignments UOP

    • How was the conflict between supporters of a strong federal government and champions of states’ rights characterized then as opposed to now? Identify specific issues.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution
    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federalist vs. Anti-federalist Perspectives on the Constitution

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson's Anti-Federalism
    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jefferson's Anti-Federalism

    Jefferson strived to attain an efficient economy, and broaden the country’s territory. Jefferson’s anti-federalist stance determined reduced government spending on the military. He felt that if the government were to be involved in the daily lives of citizens, then they should avoid taxing the people. He cut government spending on the army and navy because he believed that it was illogical to spend money on something that was not apparent of happening. Furthermore, his beliefs of small centralized government initiated the idea that to procure a large military would commence war. By regulating military spending, the government was capable of focusing on other aspects of economic spending. Jefferson felt that government spending on the military…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Legislative Cooperative Federalism
    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Legislative Cooperative Federalism

    Anti Federalist- small farmers frontiersmen who believed that government should be close to the people and that the concentration of power in the elites is dangerous. This relates to the topic of are unit because people were trying to figure out a way to govern our country and the Anti- federalists thought a certain way. This concept is important to American politics because the Anti federalists were a party who had a certain belief and they are just like the republican or democratic party today.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism
    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Federalism

    We Federalist’s believe that the government needs to be divided into three parts, with equal powers and balances and checks, for it to work effectively. Now the Anti-Federalist’s believe that we are trying to give all power to the larger states in the North and ignore the needs of our brethren the South states. We are not. We are just trying to create a fair government.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Economic Fighting In The 1800's
    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Economic Fighting In The 1800's

    “The North had an industrial economy based on manufacturing. They supported tariffs because they wanted american goods to be sold at lower prices than British goods could. The South was an agrarian economy based on agriculture, meaning that they supplied themselves by growing their own food. The South opposed the tariffs because it would destroy their economy because it would increase the cost of imported goods. The West was an emerging economy and supported the internal improvements and the sale of public lands. When Jackson’s vice president John C. Calhoun supported the criteria needed for a strong central government but didn’t support the tariffs of abominations. In response to the tariffs of abomination, he created the South Carolina Expositions and Protest. Then protest advanced to the states’ rights doctrine. He argued that, because the states had formed the national government, state power should be greater than federal power. He believed states had the right to nullify, or reject, any federal law they judged to be unconstitutional”(Deverell, William and Deborah Gray White). This would help in the future because it would allow states to be more…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Objections To The Anti Federalists
    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Objections To The Anti Federalists

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Importance of Congressional Structure
    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Importance of Congressional Structure

    According to David Mayhew, author of Congress: The Electoral Connection, Congress has many different functions that it performs including: “ . . .legislating, overseeing the executive, expressing public opinion, and servicing constituents” (Mayhew 2004, 8). While all these are important to the role Congress plays, the most important ability is the authority to create laws. Congress derives its power to perform its functions and to create laws, from Article I of the Constitution. Although Article I may be oft overlooked, the authority given to Congress from it is critically important to understanding legislative politics. Without structures and rules, Congress would be unable to make laws, would have little authority and could not function properly as a check to the other branches of government.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Dual Federalism: National And State Governments
    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Dual Federalism: National And State Governments

    In this case, the spheres of responsibility were clearly defined. A layer cake can best describe the division of power between the two levels of governance. At the time, different courts had different interpretations of federalism. The Marshall court supported expansive federal powers. This court had a major influence on how power was shared between the national and state governments. Two cases that were key in defining dual federalism are McCulloh v. Maryland of 1819 and Gibbons v. Ogden of 1824. The Taney Court on the other hand had a different view of federalism. The court supported two equally powerful levels of government (Lee, 2010). The court was of the view that the national government should not exceed its powers beyond the constitutionally accepted levels. The court was influential in limiting the control that the national government had on the issue of slavery and civil rights. One key case at the time was Dred Scott v. Sandford of…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Effects Of American Federalism On The Articles Of Confederation
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Effects Of American Federalism On The Articles Of Confederation

    American federalism was created as a response to the unsatisfying effects of the Articles of Confederation. Delegates were sent to the constitutional convention in Philadelphia, and decided at this union that in order to create a satisfactory establishment, they must protect the safety of the citizen's, keep civil disruption at a minimum, provide for every citizen's well-being as well as protect their rights and freedom.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two Sides Of The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists
    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Two Sides Of The Federalist And The Anti-Federalists

    In American history, we fought long and hard to get there but there has always been a clear line in regards to our politics. We have two sides that have straightforward ideologies, and two sides that are separated for all the good of the people that are involved. In history, we had the Federalist and the Anti-federalist who stood out with different ideologies on how our country’s government should run and the rule of law should be executed. The Federalist wanted a stronger national government, and the Anti-federalist who opposed a stronger federal government.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Marshall Federalism
    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Marshall Federalism

    Throughout U.S. History many different types of government were created in an attempt to govern and unify the people. One such government, federalism, divided the balance of power between the states and the national government. Federalism caused a lot of controversy throughout the history of the United States. One time period in which there were significant debates about federalism was the Supreme Court under John Marshall (1801-1835) due to his rulings based on his federalist views. The other time period was the Extension of Slavery (1820-1860) which also caused much debates between federalism and state rights. Landmark Supreme Court decisions involving federalism were decided in both of these time periods.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratification Of Federalism
    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page

    Ratification Of Federalism

    The Federalists, writing under the pseudonym Publius, advocated a strong central government against the anti-Federalist writers like Brutus, whose fresh memories of British tyranny inspired their fear of centralized power. While there is much debate on who theoretically won the political battle, that resulted in the ratification of the constitution in 1789, it is clear that modern America has been pushed in a direction, far past James Madison ideas of a balanced federal government.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Political Parties Vs Federalists
    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Political Parties Vs Federalists

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Federal Supremacy In The States
    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federal Supremacy In The States

    The debate of states’ rights versus federal supremacy is one that affects America today and has since the country was founded. It started with the writing of the Constitution in 1787 and the formation of Federalists and Anti-Federalists, who had opposing views on the document. The two major arguments were that a strong central government would eventually become tyrannical, and that a strong central government was needed for the nation to move forward. Years of conflict between the two sides occurred, over what form of government was best and what rights should be given to the states and government. continuing until the end of the Civil War when the power of the Federal government was finally cemented.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More