Was it wise for Charlie Gordon from the book “Flowers for Algernon” by daniel keyes to get genetical intelligence surgically implanted in him? I believe that he should have got it regardless of the negative things that happened to him due to the surgery.…
People has the dream to become smarter than their friends, some even succeed while others fail. Charlie dreamed of becoming smarter so he could be accepted, and he achieved his dream with one simple operation. His life after the operation was easy, but it all started going downhill from there. People, such as myself, say that in the story “Flowers for Algernon”, by Daniel Keyes, Charlie should have never had the operation. But the opposing side has a different view on the situation. But in my own personal opinion, I believe that Charlie should of never had the operation.…
What if there was an operation to make people with a low IQ smarter? In the story,” Flowers for Algernon”, one of the most asked questions is, should Charlie have had the operation? No, I do not think that Charlie should have had the operation and these are reasons why.…
* Always a motive by Dan Ross shows the struggle of a man to prove his innocence despite strong evidence against him. The investigating officer does not understand him, and he is presumed guilty. The theme is portrayed that individuals may take surprising actions that are not known by others. This theme is effectively reviled through its characters, and title.…
Flowers for Algernon was written by Daniel Keys, the novel is about a retarded adult who is turned into a genius by an operation. Then soon discovers how lucky he really was before the operation. Although the cause of the isolation may be different it always has a negative effect on the character.…
As an anonymous person once said “ don't let anyone's hate, drama, or negativity stop you from being the best person you can be.” Toni Cade Bambara displayed this in ”Raymond’s Run” throughout the story, as Raymond, a mentally challenged youth, only did things that made him happy despite other people’s thoughts. In “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes shows this as well when Charlie tries and tries to gain intelligence even though he has his disability. He always does what he thinks he should, even though other people doubt him and his choices. The similarities between " Raymond's run " and " Flowers for Algernon " include the first person narrator and the dialogue; however there are also differences such as the characters tone.…
Sometimes, a specific story can include more than one theme. Take my choice of story for example. My story, “Flowers for Algernon,” has multiple themes that could fit with it. I believe the most appropriate theme for “Flowers for Algernon” is that too much of a good thing can end up being bad.…
the theme for my story is “too much of a good thing can be a bad thing”. This is evident when charlie starts to lose his intelligence. Charlie was apart of an experiment intended to raise a person’s IQ synthetically, and 3 times the original amount. The goal was achieved but the side effects were unbelievable: after it ultimately wore off, Algernon- the test rat- died, worrying everyone. Soon, Charlie began to lose his intelligence and he ended up right where he had started.…
Making decisions is critical, but making a decision for an operation is more important. In the fiction novel Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, Charlie Gordon deals with a mental disorder. To be smarter, he decides to have a brain surgery. Animals have only done this surgery, particularly a lab rat named Algernon. Within a week after Charlie’s operation, he is able to maintain information improved. After a month, his intelligence becomes tremendous; he is able to read books within minutes. Negative effects have also altered him. His emotions are a continuous scale of unsteady. If his operation did not take place, he would have been better off. The negative effects that take place after his surgery are worse than his life before it took place. Charlie’s emotions would never be crazy, people would still enjoy his company, and he would be able to walk through his life without knowing his friends did not care about him.…
Charlie Gordon showed us that surgerys are very risky and we should really think before we do risky things. In the science fiction story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keys, Charlie has a passion to get intelligent but in my perspective the surgery was useless and risky. Charlie Gordon should not have had the Artificial Intelligence surgery because i was risky and it wasn't permanent.…
Is insanity hereditary or is it caused by your environment? I have often found myself thinking this while reading this book. In this book One Flew over the Cuckoo's Nest, it seems that my questions were not answered but multiplied. In society you can see that some people may are born without emotions and empathy and this presents itself as insanity. And in other instances, it seems as if the human brain can only take so much and it results in insanity. Social groups in this book are seen and represented as something they aren't. Three examples are McMurphy, The black male nurses, and the women nurses.…
Guilt is a difficult feel to cope with. However, being blamed guilty while being innocent…
Guilt is not a simple feeling but is a past event attached with a lesson in a person’s life. In the short story “Turkle” by David Carpenter, Elmer the farmer felt tremendous guilt after he told his wife, Elsie that he would be taking the children to school no matter the weather. This foolish action not only put his three children in danger but himself as well, resulting in the four almost all losing their lives.…
In Flower for Algernon, Daniel Keyes presents the idea that everyone should treat people the way they want to be treated. In the book Charlie was invited to a party, some people there decided to joke with Charlie and gave him a plastic apple. Charlie ended up taking a bite into the fake apple and when he did everyone was laughing at him, Frank then said “I told ya he’d eat it. C’n you imagine anyone dumb enough to eat wax fruit?” (Keyes 41).…
For centuries scapegoating has exist, as a society we use it in order to blame somebody else for our own mistakes it is also seen as a human habit. Scapegoating has been as an escape form for human beings, when something bad happens, society look for a person or victim to blame on, instead of them to be blamed. As people we discard the idea to be blamed, therefore we adopt scapegoating as a habit, unfortunately as humans it is very hard to accept our own mistakes. When we blamed someone else for our own misfortunes, the only thing we have in consideration, is the idea of not be blamed, but we never think on the consequences that the person would have to pass thorough. A lot of people might think that scapegoating doesn’t exist anymore or that we as a society don’t apply it more often, but suddenly we use it unconsciously, because it has become as an instinct.…