The against model however holds the view that psychology and Christianity are essentially …show more content…
Carter states that scripture has much to say that can influence our understanding of psychological research, theory, and practice. Psychology is raising questions and providing data that bear on our theological understanding of the human being, and theology expresses divinely revealed truths that speaks to psychology's developing view of humanity
Integration takes place where your Christian faith affects you as a person/professional and also affects how you think, and do your work. Science is not viewed in the traditional empirical manner; rather the person’s controlled beliefs can shape how you build psychology. Bruce Narramore, and John D. Carter’s critique on the integration model was that the Christian's resolve must be to avoid ultimate ties of loyalty to any model of Integration. This is true because all models themselves are human constructions and thus beneath us; this would be true even if we were not fallen. Our fallen condition simply adds a practical reason (i.e. We cannot take human theories seriously because they are, in principle, fallible.) to the eternal wisdom which says that the creator does not bow down to his …show more content…
Psychology is treated as a valid and necessary science or profession and theology or Christianity is viewed as a helpful, personal societal phenomenon. Their views run parallel to each other but will never truly integrate. The researcher chose this view because even though Christianity and psychology has similarities such as promoting self-understanding/awareness, promoting behaviour change, providing tools to improve/develop self and functioning at a high level. The disagreements noted contradicts the similarities proving it is better to think of psychology and Christianity/theology as two disciplines whose areas of study overlap rather than two disciplines with distinct areas of