The Justification Of The Struggle Against The Slave Trade In International Law Analysis

The Justification of the Struggle against the Slave Trade in International Law Slavery in International law is defined by several treaties, declarations and conventions. The justification against slave trade is non-derogable under the comprehensive international and regional human rights treaties, incorporating the international covenant on civil and political rights, the American Convention of Human Rights, and the European convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Smith (2018) mentioned that it is within the jurisdiction of the international law to use the confines enshrined in its constitution to give justice to humans. Several reasons account for the struggle against the slave trade in international law. That
The missioners wanted a viable space to spread Christianity and thus had to advocate for stopping of the slave trade. Christianity is premised on actions that are Christ-like. It intends to spread love and not hate. It serves to advocate for the goodness that comes with persons that live in accordance with kingdom principles. Religion came as a sigh of relief to people and gave comfort and encouragement (Toledano, 2014). Such factors mounted pressure that could significantly justify the stop to the slave trade. Their formation of humanitarian organizations and movements in England and other regions in the world were premised on terminating all kinds of cruelty. Such acts of cruelty, for instance, child labor, flogging of soldiers and slave were inhuman and thus had to be fought by all means (Du Bois, 2014). Interest groups also joined the humanitarian teams, and it began a collaborative agenda to stop the barbaric approach in the slave trade. The law had to be formulated to protect the interest of the vast majority on humanitarian ground (Martineau,
The coming up of men, for instance, Adam Smith was pivotal. According to Rothwell and Stephens (2016), he did challenge the economic arguments which were founded on slave trade and production. He convincingly argued that hired labor was far much productive and cheaper in comparison than the slave labor. That became an eye opener to a majority of the businessmen, and they bought the idea. In the same regard, Rousseau did spread the message of equality and personality liberty of all men (Rothwell & Stephens, 2016). That touched vast population and thumped up the humanitarian calls that were going on during those periods. Slowly, profits in slave trade had gone low and at the same time had led to overpopulation in regions like Europe (Toledano, 2014). Particular influential abolitionists, for instance, William Wilberforce requested the British government to do its legislation against the slave trade in her colonies. That received major support from across various members of the legislative assembly. On the same breath, Garelli and Tazzioli (2017) confirmed that the ship owners associations terminated transporting slaves from Africa to Europe and that much resulted in a decline in the slave trade. They instead, started the transportation of raw materials directly from America and