ID: 16927
THE LATİFUNDA SYSTEM IN ROME
The latifunda system, which established first in ancient Rome around 2nd century BC, were large farms which were owned by the wealthy classes. The latifundia became common in the Roman Empire as a result of the decline of Roman moral values and the political corruption that resulted from the acquisition of wealth and power that the Empire brought. With the breakdown of the Pax Romana and the inability of Roman law to provide security, small landowners increasingly turned to larger, more powerful estates for security. Peasants turned over their land to the latifundia and formed a new class called the slaves.
Slaves from conquered territory were bought and forced to manage and work. The abundant supply of slaves led to increase in worse labor condition and decrease in free laborers on these large estates. These estates turned plantation systems included a lot of working slaves, known as Latifundias, became popular and spread throughout many regions in the Roman. In my opinion, it is not ignorable that the latifundia led to huge increase in production and trade, so more profit and wealth. But these gains served only the wealthy landowners.
Latifundia benefited the elite class greatly, because it provided freedom as merchant traders and they used cheap slave labour force to gain more agricultural or animal product. With the latifundia, instead of previous demands to grow grain, a new age of farming was introduced, producing olive oil and wine, and herding sheep and cattle for trade.
In my opinion the increasing gap between lords and slaves was a negative effect of latifunda that lead to some social problems. For instance, only the wealthy could afford to lease this land they eventually began treating it as if it were their own and not the states. The small farmers and slaves became to depend on the wealthy class and lose their freedom. Sometimes there are several protests were all in attempt to lessen the power gap between the wealthy and poor, but, as the protests kept being overturned. However tension between the wealthy and peasants continued to increase.
One of the important negative effects of latifundia system is "Over-farming". As independent farmers were replaced by large slave-farmed estates the basis of farming became short-term profit; so there was little done in terms of conservation or properly fertilizing crops, so fertility decreased quickly in these agricultural areas. Large areas of southern Italy became literal dust bowls, as they remain today. As a result, Italy could no longer feed itself.
In sum, although the latifunda system raised the production and trade, it lead to negative social and environmental condition which would cause bigger problem in future in Rome.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
1) 753 B.C.E The city of Rome was founded by Romulus. Who was cast adrift on the Tiber River as a baby and was nursed by a she-wolf.…
- 265 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The use of slavery varied between Rome and Han China. Rome’s population of slaves was large, whereas China had less slaves. In China, the population of the lower class/ peasants was higher. The large population of peasants lowered the need of slavery. The peasants could take the work of the slaves. Thus, slavery did not become a major source of labor for agriculture or manufacturing. However, in Rome slavery became an important element of the social structure. The population of slaves comprised of at least one third of the population. Slaves usually came from conquered lands, race did not determine slavery. The poor man’s slave was the ox, and even plebeians had some slaves. Slaves were the backbone of the economy in Rome. Roman slaves were regarded as barbarians. Soon, Romans began to see other people as slaves by nature. All occupations except for military service were available to slaves. Since slaves were more common in Rome, they became their own distinct class. In China, slavery was far less…
- 843 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
As a result: the Roman economy continues to fall apart. This is due to the importation of slaves from the conquered areas of Africa, Asia, and Britain, where the empire expanded. (Doc 3) The increase of slave numbers led the patricians to buy more land, because they had more workers. In the act of buying more land the patricians produced more resources and put the plebeians out of business. Due to the high number of unemployed plebeians they were provided free food and entertainment to please them, so that they would not revolt. Due to the free bread and entertainment the economy fell greatly due to the fact there was no income to pay for more bread and entertainment. As well as the fall of the economy the morals and principals decay. (Doc 6) As well as using up part of the food for other places in the empire. A map that shows exports and the quantity of the exports to different regions of the empire would be a helpful tool to show how the other parts of the empire was effected by unemployment and inflation. So due to the weakened economy, the empire is already starting to go broke when the Huns and other Germanic tribes start to invade, which causes many more problems for the…
- 905 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Owners of latifundias operated at lower costs than did owners of smaller holdings. These owners often resulted to mortgaging their lands to aristocrats due to the fact that they could not compete with the latifundias. Thus, causing unemployment and famines for this class. These peasants moved to cities, where they became “mobs”. Wealthy patricians often hired people into personal armies. Civil wars i.e. Caesar and Pompey, often broke out between high ranking officials, thus leading to political instability. During the first and second century CE of Rome, there were social tensions due to the unequal land distribution. As a way to mend the unequal land distribution issue, reformers attempted to redistribute the land, i.e. Gracchi Brothers, Tiberius and Gaius. Unfortunately these men did not succeed due to the fact that most members of the wealthy and ruling classes disagreed with the ideas of the brothers and found their way around their redistribution method. In fact, this action caused them to pay a high price – their lives. For fear that the brothers would have a greater effect on Roman affairs, their enemies had them assassinated. Wang Mang, just as the Gracchi Brothers had attempted with Rome, tried to reform the distribution of land in China.…
- 935 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
All of the dominated lands were integrated into a larger economy and society. Roman expansion had dramatic effects in the European lands that were embraced by the empire. When the Roman soldiers, diplomats, governors, and merchants began to arrive, they stimulated the development of local economies and states. Resources were accessed such as tin, and they encouraged people to cultivate wheat, olives, and grapes to help the Roman economy flourish. The Roman representatives allied with various local ruling elites and used the wealth that came into their communities to control natural resources and build much larger states then ever before. Cities emerged where administrators and merchant conducted their…
- 961 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Due to the large number of slaves working on the farms of the rich, farmers who used to work at nearby lands started to lose their jobs and the little income they used to earn. The problems with property and debt became so severe that the farmers eventually sold their lands to search for other jobs. Even with that, they could not be employed as the slaves took up most of the available jobs (Perry et al. 2007 : 13). The poverty, tax and military service caused much suffering among the Italians (Appian R. Hist. Ex. 7). In addition to that, decreasing number of crops, problems regarding transportation and the rebellion of slaves in Sicily caused an increase in the prices of grain, adding more burden on the already poor farmers (Blois & Spek 1997 : 196). As cited in Stockton, “Tiberius Gracchus sought to carry an agrarian law. It appealed to the common people. It looked likely to safeguard the fortunes of the poor.” (Stockton 1979 : 31). This downfall of Rome’s economy at that time not only affected the lives of the people but also directly influenced the military manpower of Rome. Poor men who continue to lose their lands dropped to a social class where they are not qualified to enroll in the army due to their low asset qualifications that does not exceed the minimum standard to join legionary service. Most of the soldiers are also left with nothing after they retire except possessions seized from victories in…
- 1626 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In an economic aspect everyone in Rome was happier. Everyone could own land and people were making money. Slaves and freed slaves however couldn’t own land or other things. People in Rome were often rich and had a lot of money. That also improved quality of life of the Roman people.…
- 279 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
When the Roman Empire flourished in culture and wealth, what began to lack was humanity. The wealthy Romans owned slaves, whose jobs were mostly manual labor. When estates were small treatment of slaves seemed to be in some ways tolerable. As farms grew larger, masters changed their views on treatment of slaves. The approach became more brutal and impersonal. Without slaves on farms the upper class would not be able to make their money. The upper class would have…
- 1934 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the main reasons that allowed Rome was able to flourish was the generous giving of citizenship. That citizenship along with the factor of wealth decided a person social status. Slaves were not considered to have much worth socially. There was disparity of power between the rich and the poor. The rich were always wary of the gatherings of the poor, uneducated for fear of revolt.…
- 543 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
As the Empire grew larger, so did the Patricians’ estates, or Latifundia, leading to mass unemployment and sensitive areas in society. For instance, when the Romans conquered new lands, “The abundance of slaves led to growth of the latifundia, the great estates that… came to dominate agriculture and ruin the free coloni (farmers) who drifted to the cities, to add to the unemployment there” ( Muller Doc 3). This shows that, the wealthy…
- 466 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Many rich citizens, known as Patricians bought slaves to do their work. As a result, the abundance of slaves took away farmers’ jobs. In addition, they promoted the increase of latifundias, or ranches that slaves work in, which was a factor to the growth of slaves dominating agriculture and causing farmers to flee to cities. Therefore, this added to the rate of unemployment in Rome. For that reason, low pay was given to workers, another jab at the falling economy. Part of the money went to the army and government, so it hindered Rome to a suppressing taxation. Tenants fled from their farms, and businessmen fled from their jobs. Private businesses were disintegrated. For that reason, the state government had no other choice but to take over countless companies. Now the government has to juggle with their own problems and the private businesses too. Even though slaves were taking away jobs, Rome still depended on them. But, when expansion ground to a halt, Rome’s supplies and slaves began to dry…
- 902 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Slavery was a major mercantile in ancient Rome. In terms of economic value, slaves can be consider as an important commodity for the Romans, as its demand were high enough. Thus, in every three Roman households have used slaves' labor. On other hand, there were two types of slave, the white-collar and blue-collar slave. The labor forces of those slaves was an integral to the overall economy of Rome as without them plantation farms left uncultivated and unproductive and major businesses will not flourish without those slaves, who work as accountant and managers, that ran them (Classic page website, n.d).…
- 362 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Ancient Rome is recognized as being the forefront of technological innovations and efficiency improvement. The Pont du Gard aqueduct is no less than an impressive engineering feat, stretching for miles to deliver water to town centers. Roman architectural features, such as arches and domes, still remain a prominent presence in modern architecture, proving just how timeless, and more importantly, functional these inventions are. However, one notable difference between the two societies is that unlike Ancient Rome's approach to technological adoption through the appropriation of foreign territories, the United States gained its technological edge through development and research. From the invention of electricity and automobiles to computers,…
- 573 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The institution of slavery oppressed enslaved individuals, the effects were felt beyond the large slave population. In the early 1800’s, the largest class in the south was yeoman farmers, small-scale, non-slaveholding farmers who, eighty percent of the time, owned their own land. Although numerically the yeoman farmers were superior, the balance of power was slanted utterly towards the small slave-holding class. Even in the matter of land distribution, most of the fertile and nutrient-rich land was used to support plantations built by the wealthy slaveowners.…
- 691 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Republic began in 509 B.C.E. with the overthrow of the Etruscan monarchy. In 27 B.C.E the Roman Empire began with Octavian Caesar becoming the emperor, this ended almost 500 years of republican self-government. There is much debate over why Rome became so powerful so quickly. Many think it had to do with Rome's military strength. Others think that it was because Rome knew of and controlled most of the trade routes. Still others believed it had to do with the technology that was advanced during the Roman Republic. All of these factors played significant roles, but which one played the most important role?…
- 617 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays