The Takers are nonetheless the civilized class of people who are settled and modernized. On the opposite side of the spectrum, is the Leavers. The Leavers are the people who are from the outside cultures; the ones who are not used to the modernization that is present in the society. The Takers and the Leavers are substantial to the increased modernization in society. This is because, the diversification that comes with the Leavers, helps grow and industrialize to a higher extent. Leavers are said to leave the world as discovered because it is our nature. Takers believe that they can take what they please which eludes to a destruction of society. With that being said, it eludes to an epidemic with the Takers. Knowing that this could ultimately lead to the destruction of society, it is prominent in our society today as we speak. People cutting down trees and hunting are just simply two examples. These examples are very important because we would be depleting our world of oxygen with cutting down the trees and we would be making more species extinct. With Ishmael’s knowledge in the field of ecology and captivity, he believes that the path being followed will inevitably destroy what was initially a society. Daniel Quinn uses the quote “The world of the Takers is one vast prison, and except for a handful of Leavers scattered across the world, the entire human …show more content…
As a brief explanation of this law, it is in particular, to not take an excess of one entity, to only take the amount needed. “It is holy work, in Taker culture. The more competitors you destroy, the more humans you can bring into the world, and that makes it just about the holiest work there is. Once you exempt yourself from the law of limited competition, everything in the world except your food and the food of your food becomes an enemy to be exterminated.” (76) Simply, this quote is stating that by one species exempting themselves from the law, it ultimately effects everyone and everything around them. Additionally, this would elude to a less diverse society and a destruction of modernization. The law of limited competition correlates to Darwin’s theory of Darwinism; simply defined as “survival of the fittest.” The correspondence comes into effect because if you are not the fittest in society, you will not get what you need. The ones who are there first, will take what they need, or even exempt themselves from the law of limited competition and take a surplus. However, if you are the weak one, the unfit one in society, you are out of