Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Lesser of Two Evils: Why the Atomic Bomb Was Justified

Good Essays
913 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Lesser of Two Evils: Why the Atomic Bomb Was Justified
The Lesser Of Two Evils:
Why the Atomic Bomb Was Justified As history has progressed, Man has always looked back and debated why certain actions occurred and whether or not such measures should have been taken. Though numerous such arguments take place, one of the most debated issues is that of the dropping of the atomic bomb at the end of World War Two. Critics of the atomic bomb argue that far too many people were killed through the United States ' use of the bomb, they state that other means were available. The fact of the matter is, only one other method was available and that was the overland invasion of Japan. The Bomb 's use, despite the many casualties it caused, actually saved lives, both American and Japanese, and prevented many more years of conflict. The most obvious argument for The Bomb is to point at the number of lives it saved. The "island-hopping" campaign in the Central Pacific had slowly pushed the Japanese north towards Japan. Assault on island after island took their toll on both the American and Japanese forces. The first step towards Japan was taken in November of 1943 with an amphibious invasion of Tarawa, a small island containing only 4,800 men, of which only 146 survived. The Japanese were a determined fighting force and inflicted 3,300 casualties upon the attacking American troops. The "die-hard" attitude of the Japanese was reflected in all following island battles such as the Mariana Island invasion in which 23,000 Americans fell victim to Japanese warriors, of whom more than 40,000 were slain. Despite their determination, however, the Japanese could not hold back the American war machine, despite inflicting more than 75,000 more casualties upon the assaulting American servicemen before the dropping of the atomic bomb. As MacArthur 's island campaign was starting, American strategists were already planning for the eventual invasion of the Japanese home-islands. Early in 1943 it was slated that the assault would begin on November 1st, 1945. The initial invasion force would consist of 250,000 troops that would then be backed up by an additional 550,000 soldiers upon establishing a foothold in Japan. Japan 's plans to counter the American invasion included 2.5 million combat troops supplemented by a militia that consisted of nearly a quarter of Japan 's population, including women. Just as the soldiers in the central Pacific had done, most of these people could be expected to fight to the death, with an expected outcome of more than one and a half million Japanese deaths. American soldiers who would be charged with occupying the island could expect only hatred from civilians and many would be killed even in conquered areas. All in all, more than 370,000 Americans would be likely casualties in the invasion of Japan. On August 6th, 1945, the B-29 bomber Enola Gay dropped the first atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, inflicting 70,000 casualties upon the Japanese and destroying more than sixty percent of the city. Despite this incredible destruction, however, the Japanese still refused to surrender to the Allies. Three days later, another Bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, killing an additional 35,000 Japanese and destroying two square miles of the city. In light of the death of 105,000 of its citizens, Japan 's War Committee finally declared an unconditional surrender to the United States on August 10th, 1945. Though a ghastly number of people were slain by the use of the atomic bombs, more lives were saved by the sacrifice of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As the war approached the autumn of 1945, the American people were growing tired of the war and President Truman needed to find a quick way to end the war. It was estimated that an invasion of Japan would last through 1946 and into 1947. Many troops had been demobilized with the surrender of Germany, but a large number of units were being transferred from Europe to the Pacific for the upcoming invasion. Transferees were becoming increasingly mutinous but could not be dealt with too harshly-- they had done their job in Europe, all the public wished for now was peace. Time was being paid for with lives, and the quickest way to bring the war to an end was through the use of the atomic bomb. World War Two was the largest war in history, with more battles being fought, more boundaries being pushed, and more deaths than had been ever seen. World War Two was a time of great technological advance and, as such things go, the technology discovered was put to use. The discovery and use of the atomic bomb was crucial to the rapid end of the war against Japan and despite the deaths it caused, its use was justified. Lives would be lost as a result of any action against the Japanese, so in the end, it was the atomic bomb, not an invasion, that was the less evil of the paths to end the war. Bibliography
Victory At Sea, James F. Dunnigan and Albert A. Nofi, William Morrow & Company
Inc., New York, NY, ©1995
"World Wars", Encyclopedia Britannica, pages 802A – 802J Encyclopedia Britannica
Inc., ©1971
Since The Beginning, Jerry H. Combee, A Beka Book, Pensacola FL, ©1993
World War II, C. L. Sulzberger, American Heritage Publishing Co., ©1966
History of the World: The Last Five Hundred Years, Esmond Wright, Bonanza Books,
Twickenhan, Middlesex, England, ©1984

Bibliography: Victory At Sea, James F. Dunnigan and Albert A. Nofi, William Morrow & Company Inc., New York, NY, ©1995 "World Wars", Encyclopedia Britannica, pages 802A – 802J Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., ©1971 Since The Beginning, Jerry H. Combee, A Beka Book, Pensacola FL, ©1993 World War II, C. L. Sulzberger, American Heritage Publishing Co., ©1966 History of the World: The Last Five Hundred Years, Esmond Wright, Bonanza Books, Twickenhan, Middlesex, England, ©1984

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During World War II, the Japanese and Americans were at war. Japan had an advantage over American military troops with a greater number of troops being put out into the war. On the other hand, American troops and military bases had a technological advantage, which ultimately helped the Americans succeed during the war. President Truman made one of the most difficult decisions in American history. Truman’s decision would kill many Japanese soldiers but would save many of the Americans. An atomic bomb would be the last resort, which would wipe out countless miles of land, military bases, and anyone who was close by. As Truman had to think about the pros and cons of this decision, it was ultimately Truman’s say so in whether to proceed and…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Truman’s decision of the atomic bombing has undeniably made a huge impact to world’s history events. Throughout decades, many individuals’ have encountered diverse explanations as to why it was necessary for the dropping of the atomic bomb. While others believe it was essential, some may think that it caused an enormous catastrophe, murdering millions of innocent civilians and produced a generation with an atrocious radiation poison. Years has passed by and it continues to be the utmost talked about event. The atomic bombing that took place in Japan can be argued that it was the greatest decision made by president Truman. There are majority of different schools of thought behind President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombing. Readings that have been encountered can conclude that President Truman’s decision was a great one. This event prevented future fatalities amongst the Japanese as well as the Americans, ended the world war II, and it was the only option handed to Truman.…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The atomic bomb shouldn’t have been used in World War 2 to defeat Japan. America could have used other alternatives then the deadly atomic bomb. President Truman should of waited a few more weeks for russia to declare war on Japan. The thought of invasion by both of America and Russia probably had an even more scared effect on the Japanese government then the Atomic Bombs. America could of also continue the conventional bombings and blockade.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By dropping the atomic bomb, we were able to put an end to a war that could have continued for many more years. Though there was much controversy over the bomb, Truman, our president at the time, apprised America saying he was quite thankful for it and celebrated the scientific achievements of the minds that created it. America was the first country to create something of this caliber and he wanted us to realize how great it was. The pragmatic decision helped America to establish its military power on a global scale. It is believed that Japan did not believe that we had a weapon that could cause so much destruction, so we had no choice but to show them. The Japanese people do not believe in surrendering, they see it as dishonorable and are…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When talking about WW2 and Japan, something that comes to mind often is the atomic bomb. Some people say it was a good thing, as it ended one of the worst war in history. however, some say that it was wrong to drop a bomb of a country that was on the verge of surrender. Proof of this statement, this essay will tell you.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dropping of the atom bomb on Japan saved American lives. If American soldiers invaded Japan we would have lost even more lives. “More than 55,000 Americans had already died in the Pacific. The bomb prevented more American lives to be lost” (Walker). This shows that so many American lives were already lost, and by dropping the bombs there were many lives that were saved. Because of the bomb dropping, a huge number of American lives were saved. “An invasion of Japan would have resulted in another 500,000 American lives lost” (The Human Cost). This shows that dropping the bomb was a good idea because we didn’t have to invade Japan so we could save lives.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What would you do if you were a soldier, and you knew that if your country didn’t drop the atomic bomb, then you would die? This is what many soldiers were thinking about on August 6th, 1945 when the American government decided to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. By doing this they saved millions of American lives. When they did this Japan surrendered and it won us the war. Also, it demonstrated the power of America. America did the right thing by dropping the atomic bomb.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle of Iwo Jima (19 February – 26 March 1945) was a pivotal conflict during World War II characterized by some of the fiercest fighting in the Pacific Campaign. For Japan, Iwo Jima served as their last line of defense protecting their homeland from the Allied advancements. Japan knew the strategic significance of the island for both Allied and Axis powers and was equally certain that the U. S. would seek to secure it. Resolved that America would pay a huge price for every inch of ground gained, The Battle of Iwo Jima become the bloodiest battle of World War II and remains the most costly of battles in Marine Corps history. Three Marine Divisions conducted an amphibious landing and assault to destroy one heavily defended Japanese Division on the 7.5 square mile island of Iwo Jima. The 36-day assault claimed 6,766 U.S. lives and nearly 20,000 wounded. For the Japanese, the loss was even more staggering with only 1,083 survivors of the original 21,060 defenders. General Tadamichi Kuribayashi, the commander for Japanese forces, “proved to be Japan’s greatest wartime general and…the most redoubtable adversary” for the United States. Kuribayashi displayed brilliant leadership and tactical application of strategic objectives, as he skillfully employed the art and science of mission command in his epic defense of Iwo Jima.…

    • 2411 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was also considerable anger in the US against Japan for the way it had started the war and for the atrocities committed by Japanese soldiers. The US were planning an invasion of the southernmost island of Kyushu in an attempt to bring the war to an end. Potential US casualties were expected to be over 200 000. President Truman wanted to end the war as quickly as possible with the fewest U.S. casualties. The atomic weapons had been developed for this purpose and once they were tested it was expected that they would be…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some people are under the belief that Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was because of the nature of the war against Japan. During this time of conflict, Americans believed that the war, itself, was a racial war and the war was also a campaign for revenge because of the attack on Pearl Harbor. In the article “Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Bomb,” the author Marc Rothenberg…

    • 1744 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1945, when the atomic bomb was dropped in Japan I felt that it was not justified. Even though it saved thousands of American lives it was at the cost of others lives. The United States could have gave the Japanese a warning before dropping not one, but two bombs on them. However, the Japanese did not surrender until after the second bomb I think a warning would have made the bombing “justified.”…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have come a long way since we decided to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II. It is amazing that we continue debating on this subject today. The US should not have decided to drop these atomic bombs. This decision was totally unnecessary. Thousands of people died who did not need to die, and many more became sick from radiation poisoning. The bombs wiped two entire cities off the map. How can anyone even argue for this in the first place? One argument that was used to support dropping the bomb was that the Japanese forfeited their rights when they aggressively attacked Pearl Harbor and committed war crimes against prisoners and the Chinese. This argument does not work for a few reasons. First, there are two types of justice in war. There is the justice for going to war and the justice for how you fight in war. The two are separate. This argument assumes that because the US had a reason to go to war, how they fought the war was automatically justified. This is false. It is possible to fight a just war unjustly. Its between ends and means. Reasonable ends do not justify unreasonable means. Also, violations of the rules of war do not justify similar actions in response. Just because the Japanese fought unfair does not mean that we were allowed too. Saying, “Well, you did it, too!” cannot be the basis for War II was bad, we should not have just forfeited our standards and done bad things as well. Our leaders were operating under the “War is hell” doctrine, which means anything that brings the end of war more quickly is good. This is not a way to actually fight wars. If war is hell, then why do we even have rules of war? Hiding behind “War is hell” is a cop out used to try to escape any responsibility for fighting properly. As long as war is here, we should have rules for it to try to lower its impact. Such rules cause mass killings, for example, the dropping of the…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the August of 1945, America dropped an atom bomb on Hiroshima. The ethical debate on this topic may never be resolved, but one cannot possibly deny the negative effects.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays