The Leveson Inquiry is an ongoing public inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the British press following the News International phone hacking scandal. The Prime Minister announced a two-part inquiry investigating the role of the press and police in the phone-hacking scandal on 13 July 2011. On 6 July 2011, when the Leveson inquiry was setup, Prime Minister David Cameron announced to the Parliament that an inquiry would be setup under the Inquiries Act 2005 to investigate further on the affair. On 13 July, David Cameron appointed Lord Justice Leveson as Chairman of the Leveson inquiry to look into specific claims about phone hacking at the News of the World, the initial police inquiry and the accusations of illegal payments to police by the press, and a second inquiry to review the general culture and ethics of the British media.
Core participants were entitled by Lord Justice Leveson as being: News International, the Metropolitan Police, victims, Northern and Shell Network Ltd, Guardian News and Media Ltd, Associated Newspapers Ltd, Trinity Mirror, Telegraph Media Group, and the National Union of Journalists. 51 victims were named by the Inquiry in November 2011, consisting of members of the public, politicians, sportsmen, and other public figures, who may have been victims of media interruption and have been granted "core participant" status in the inquiry.
Lord Justice Leveson opened the hearings on Monday 14 November 2011, saying, "The press provides an essential check on all aspects of public life. That is why any failure within the media affects all of us. At the heart of this Inquiry, therefore, may be one simple question: who guards the guardians?" Hearings into the relations between press and public took place between November 2011 and February 2012 with proof from complainants about press intrusion (interruption), journalists and media executives, those with a special interest in press behaviour and freedom, and others. These were followed in February 2012 by hearings into relationships between the press and police.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Mendez v. Westminster (1946) was a case enacted by, “Gonzalo Mendez, William Guzman, Frank Palomino, Thomas Estrada, and Lorenzo Ramirez” who “filed suit on behalf of their fifteen…children and five thousand other minor children of ‘Mexican and Latin descent’” (Valencia, 2010, p.23). They sued Westminster school district because they were denying their children the right to enter schools near their home. The school was in California and was predominantly White and did not allow any Mexican American children to attend. Mendez claimed that the school was segregating his children, and others, based on race and kept them separate from the White Society. The “Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment played a key role in the Mendez case”…
- 263 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Concurrences: Justice Douglas (along with Justice Black): The government can not be allowed to censor the press and hide information it finds embarrassing. It is the duty of the press to keep the public informed so that they can make an informed decision as whether to support or oppose government actions. Justice Brennan: In the past prior restraint on the press in only allowed in a time of war, and only then to preserve the ability to recruit an army, and to protect the movement and location of troops.…
- 1889 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Lisa Hart is referring to the Freedom of Information Act, FOIA, which requires the federal government agencies to release records to the public. The information must not fall into one of nine exempted FOIA categories. Hart is correct in assuming that the EPA should allow her access to the documents because they are a government agency and the documents she is requesting do not fall under one of the nine exemptions.…
- 71 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In this essay i will be writing and explaining how spoken language is used and adapted to influence the jury in the closing argument that convicted Louise Woodward. The prosecutor uses a variety of features in this argument to convince the jury persecute Louse Woodward. I will be going through these techniques and explaining why he uses them to influence the jury.…
- 902 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Many pressure groups use the media to promote their aims and reach out to the British public to help them achieve their aims. A recent example would be ‘Hacked Off!’ they used the recent media frenzy surrounding the phone hacking scandal of school girl Milly Dowler to promote their aims. They have managed to use the media to promote their aims to the general public and following on from the News of the World scandal the group have been at the focus of media attention and since this they have gained much more support from the British public, this support which they have received has helped them to achieve their aims, for example PM David Cameron set up a public, judge-led Leveson inquiry in order to examine the culture, practise and ethics of the press. However, it could be argued that this was sheer luck for the group, as before the scandal they had very little media attention. If it had not been for the Milly Dowler case, then it is unlikely that Hacked Off! would have been able to…
- 1253 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The author borrows the Supreme Court’s case happened in the past to demonstrate that even though the Court says to protect journalists’ right, they still reject cases from journalists. By offering cases that occurred before Mr. Risen, the author was able to intensify the attention focused on journalist’ right to the Supreme Court. Similar to the example provided by the author earlier in this essay, the use of Supreme Court’s cases highlights the inequity of the Supreme Court towards…
- 839 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
This essay will screen through the changes made in major areas of Criminal Justice System after the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry Report published and attempts to address changes that have already implemented, the supposed and actual outcomes, and effectiveness of these changes in tackling institutional racism mainly based on qualitative academic debates.…
- 2082 Words
- 9 Pages
Best Essays -
On 21 June 2011, 86 people and organisations wrote to the Prime Minister, David Cameron about the revelations, “We are aware of the various actions currently being taken within and outside government – such as the DH review and CQC internal inquiry. We hope to make submissions to those both individually and collectively. However, on their own these will not be enough and a clear programme is needed to achieve change.”…
- 712 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Bibliography: * Hough, A. and Trotman, A. (2011) Phone hacking: timeline of News Corp 's failed BSkyB bid. Telegraph, [online] 21 July 2011. Available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/phone-hacking/8650113/Phone-hacking-timeline-of-News-Corps-failed-BSkyB-takeover-bid.html (accessed 17 November 2011).…
- 2719 Words
- 11 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Guzzardi, W. (1985). The secret love affair between the press and government. Public Opinion, 8, 2-5.…
- 8143 Words
- 33 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In my belief Ombudsman is the perfect school for myself, my time here has been meticulous and well spent. The online curriculum and short schedules have helped with making this school better fit for me. The direct instruction math classes have helped me learn easier. Furthermore the minuscule campus has helped me feel more comfortable.…
- 358 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This assignment focuses on Ethics and Law for Nursing and Social work which would be based on a Case Study. The case study which I have chosen is about Blood Transfusion. Nowadays Ethics and Law brings a huge impact on Nursing. The key of ethical principles underpins the health care policies and care practices. The meaning of ethics is something which the individuals performs everyday life. The other word for ethics would be ethical dilemma. Most of the time due to the intense nature of the work nurses may come across with variety of ethical dilemmas throughtout their courses and their professional careers. As a nurse the most important to carefully handle and maintain the ethical dilemmas. Ethical principles and theories is also included in this assignment. Ethical principles and theories are the foundations of the ethical analysis because they ate the viewpoints of the guidelines which can be obtained along the pathway to a decision. The ethical theories emphasise the different points of predicting the outcome and the following duties to the individuals in order to reach an ethically correct decision. however, ethical theories are useful because the theory is directed towards a common set of the goals. The ethical principles are the common goals which the theory tries to achieve in order to be success. These goals includeds Autonomy, Beneficence, non – malfiecence and justice. These 4 ethical principles has 4 different meaning which I will describe in details into my assignment. I will also mention the NMC Code of conduct which will inlclude respect, dignity, honesty, confidentiality, equity, and valuing diversity, all these would be explained in briefly into the assignment.…
- 1528 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is the embodiment of the public’s right to know about the activities of its government. Transparency is an integral part of a democracy and is necessary to hold a government accountable to its people. FOIA is a foundational transparency law, and one of the most important tools in creating and maintaining a transparent and accountable government. It is the primary mechanism by which the public can gain access to government information. FOIA has proven to be extremely effective in creating a more transparent federal government.…
- 736 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
THE LAW REFORM COMMISSION‘S ROLE The Law Reform Commission is an independent statutory body established by the Law Reform Commission Act 1975. The Commission‘s principal role is to keep the law under review and to make proposals for reform, in particular by recommending the enactment of legislation to clarify and modernise the law. Since it was established, the Commission has published over 150 documents (Consultation Papers and Reports) containing proposals for law reform and these are all available at www.lawreform.ie. Most of these proposals have led to reforming legislation. The Commission‘s role is carried out primarily under a Programme of Law Reform. Its Third Programme of Law Reform 2008-2014 was prepared by the Commission following broad consultation and discussion. In accordance with the 1975 Act, it was approved by the Government in December 2007 and placed before both Houses of the Oireachtas. The Commission also works on specific matters referred to it by the Attorney General under the 1975 Act. Since 2006, the Commission‘s role includes two other areas of activity, Statute Law Restatement and the Legislation Directory. Statute Law Restatement involves the administrative consolidation of all amendments to an Act into a single text, making legislation more accessible. Under the Statute Law (Restatement) Act 2002, where this text is certified by the Attorney General it can be relied on as evidence of the law in question. The Legislation Directory - previously called the Chronological Tables of the Statutes - is a searchable annotated guide to legislative changes. After the Commission took over responsibility for this important resource, it decided to change the name to Legislation Directory to indicate its…
- 73885 Words
- 296 Pages
Best Essays -
The media has now re-embodied itself into a ‘public court’, jeopardizing and endangering the presumption of innocence, it has the very high potential to interfere with the administration of justice. It has completely disregarded the detrimental vital gap between an accused and a convict with the golden principles of ‘presumption of innocence until proven guilty’ and ‘guilt beyond reasonable doubt’ at stake. What individuals now observe is trial by media where media coverage now allows individuals to hear, judge and condemn those accused, all from the comfort of their home. It standards contrary to the criminal justice system of evidence laws, dictating what information can be taken into account during the court case, and the presumption of innocence. By this way, it prejudices the public and even occasionally judges and as a result the accused, that should be assumed innocent, is presumed as a criminal leaving his rights and liberty unrepressed. If overpowering publicity in the media about an accused before trial prejudices a fair trial or results in portraying him as a person who had committed the crime, it may amount to an undue interference with the “administration of justice", even possibly resulting in an incapacity to…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays