The Limitations Of Science: Natural Sciences And Human Sciences

It is a natural tendency for humans to seek for patterns to explain how and why certain things work. However, the fact that the universe has infinite complexity makes it beyond our abilities to make sense out of it; this is why we employ mapmaking to break things down to get us closer to the reality ‘out there’.
Fundamentally, science is the process of mapmaking that utilizes what we can epitomize and think about to better represent and understand the world we live in. The idea of science can be separated into two subdivisions: natural sciences and human sciences. Natural sciences are studies that concern itself with the physical world, while human sciences are studies that deal with the “biological, social and cultural aspect of the human life”. With each of its own values and limitations, the natural sciences and human sciences are effective in mapping our reality in its own ways, where natural science is efficient in creating idealized values uniformly, it lacks ecological validity, while human sciences is competent in suggesting why a phenomenon happens as a whole, it lacks the predictive
Fluorine was first isolated in 1886 by Henri Moissan; the mixture of potassium bifluoride and dry hydrogen fluoride enabled electrolysis to occur and thus isolate the element. Through this achievement, scientists were able to induct and reach consensus gentium on the phases of fluorine. Fluorine at room temperature is pale yellow; it emits a distinct pungent odor at 20 ppb and condenses into a bright yellow liquid at −188 °C. The fact that natural sciences controls and isolates variables that the hypothesis applies allows scientists to predict with a higher degree of assurance how the majority of the fluorine would react and what characteristics it will possess under certain