Preview

The Lincoln-Douglas Debates

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Lincoln-Douglas Debates
Lincoln Douglas Debates of 1858

The main causes of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 were great in number. The first was Abraham Lincoln claiming that Douglas was encouraging fears of amalgation of the races with enough success to drive thousands of people away from the Republican Party. The second was that Stephen A. Douglas was claiming that Lincoln was an abolitionist for saying that the American Declaration of Independence applied, in fact, to both blacks and whites. The third cause was Lincoln arguing that in his "House Divided" speech that Douglas was part of the conspiracy to nationalize slavery. Lincoln also expressed fear that the next Dred Scott decision would end up with Illinois as a slave state. The contents of these seven
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Comparing Lincoln And Fredrick Douglas
    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page

    Comparing Lincoln And Fredrick Douglas

    Both Abraham Lincoln and Fredrick Douglas are heroic because they fought for freedom and liberty. In the White House Funeral Sermon, for Lincoln, the preacher says that,“the cause he so ardently loved, [he fought] not for himself only, not for us only, but for all the people in all their coming generation.”(SB page 68). This means that Lincoln not only fought for our generation, but for all the generations after us. He was courageous enough to lose his life for the country he fervently loved. In a poem written by Walt Whitman(SB, page 69) he says, “…the prize we sought is won…[but] on the deck my captain lies, fallen cold and dead. ” Lincoln literally laid down his life to serve the land he loved the most. Robert Hayden wrote a poem about Frederick…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of Abraham Lincoln's Inaugural Address
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of Abraham Lincoln's Inaugural Address

    “Every drop of blood spilt with the lash, shall be paid by another drawn with the sword” (Lincoln 4). One month before the end of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln stood and delivered a very unique Inaugural Address, not only because it was his second, but because it was structured very different from others. Lincolns first term had followed the war closely, and it was a great feat to be reelected for a second term. Lincoln’s reelection showed the faith of the people in Lincoln’s ability to lead, and to bring the nation back under one banner. Just as at Gettysburg, Lincoln’s speech was concise, and only contained what he felt necessary to address, which is where the uniqueness of his speech is seen. No other president, when giving an inaugural address, had thought to talk on the state of the union, instead feeling content with just a smile and a quick thankyou speech to their voters. One month after this speech, Robert E. Lee would surrender at Appomattox, and only forty days after the speech, Lincoln would be shot at point blank range by John Wilkes Booth, whom had been within eyesight of Lincoln when he gave this address, starting one of the largest man hunts of the time.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cartwright: The Role Of Abraham Lincoln In Politics
    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cartwright: The Role Of Abraham Lincoln In Politics

    Abraham Lincoln was always into politics. When he was young, he worried about the nations' problems. When he entered politics when there was two major parties the Whigs and Democrats. The Democrats usually ruled the Congress, presidency, and many state offices. The Whig party, on the other hand, had championed banks, businesses, and corporations. They believed in a strong federal government and limited state rights. The Whig party was not antislavery party. Abraham choose the Whig in his sentence, "I am always a Whig in politics." He had served in the Illinois state legislature since his first successful election in 1834. He was in a tough campaign for Congress. His opponent was Democrat Peter Cartwright. Cartwright was a Methodist preacher, so he spoke very well and had a lot of friends in the districted.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    master of the game the political genius of Abraham Lincoln
    • 3433 Words
    • 14 Pages

    master of the game the political genius of Abraham Lincoln

    how slight a figure he appeared to be when he arrived in Washington. "Never did a…

    • 3433 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Two Sides Of Abraham Lincoln's Opposition To The North
    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two Sides Of Abraham Lincoln's Opposition To The North

    Opposition was felt by both the north and south. In the North, the opposers felt the Southerners possessed the right to be independency and felt the war affected them negatively. In the South, the opposers did not want a war or a Union advance on the newly declared Confederacy. All the opposers didn’t see a positive side to having the war. Both side also had people that just wanted peace between the sides.…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    1974 Us History Dbq
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1974 Us History Dbq

    Many believe that Lincoln was the main or only reason that the proposal was rejected. He was very convincing in explaining why it was a bad idea. He is the reason that the Republicans unanimously rejected the proposal (Document T). Similarly to his party members, Lincoln was very determined and unbending when it came to his views. (Document L) He was firmly against slavery and refused to compromise when it came to this issue. (Document S) Republicans saw that the secessionists did not see how bad slavery truly was and wanted to they wanted to prevent slavery from spreading further. (Document N) He said that slavery shall not be extended by any means under any circumstances. (Document C) In the election, Lincoln had the most electoral votes and the most popular votes, showing that the people (mainly the Northern Republicans) supported him and agreed with his views. (Document B) At the same time, Republicans believed that popular sovereignty was dangerous. (Document J)…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Lincoln-Douglas Debates During The Civil War
    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Lincoln-Douglas Debates During The Civil War

    As the United States approached the Civil War, political division among the North and South only grew, with the two regions continuing to argue over states rights, specifically the right to permit slavery within their borders. By the end of the 1850s, two politicians named Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln had made waves among the American public with their debates over the expansion and abolition of slavery. While the campaigning for political office was already a common practice among politicians at the time, the back and forth debating style as well as the sheer volume of attendees was unprecedented in any previous American campaign. Thus the Lincoln-Douglas debates illustrated a shift in the way political campaigns for office were conducted in the United States that drastically contrasted with older election formats. Prior to the Civil War were a multitude of events that contributed to the change in campaign style.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Saint John Brown DBQ
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Saint John Brown DBQ

    Frederick Douglas was honored to meet such a confident and pristine individual as John Brown, saying he “enjoyed his confidence” (Doc F). His death and the Harpers Ferry incident were one of the main causes of the Civil War. They also were enraged after several northern intellectuals, including Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson praised Brown for his actions stating that Brown’s “devotion to principle” was the equivalent of “eternal justice and glory” (Doc B). They felt that he had conducted himself bravely and intelligently during his failed attempt in inciting a slave rebellion and during his trials in Virginia. The possibility of another slave revolt, this time in a much larger scale, had touched the foremost fear of the rich, aristocratic slaveholders, and of white southerners. Lincoln, however, lectured the Democrats by stating that “the Democrats had just been whipped in some state elections, and seized upon the unfortunate Harper’s Ferry affair to influence other elections then pending. Northerners also felt that he was a freedom fighter for enslaved blacks” (Doc…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Compromise Of 1850 And Fredrick Douglas
    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Compromise Of 1850 And Fredrick Douglas

    The Compromise of 1850 was primarily about the future of slavery in the new territories and the Union. Out of the Compromise of 1850 came “The Fugitive Slave Law”, which gave owners of escaped slaves the power and the resources to procure their escaped slaves. It constituted one of its provisions was controversial federal laws that intended to pacify the slaveholding south and enraged the Northern abolitionist and ultimately provoked the Civil War.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was the Civil War fought over Slavery?
    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was the Civil War fought over Slavery?

    During the 1860s election,the topic of slavery brought many political tensions to the Republicans and Democrats.The Republicans was an anti-slavery party.The Republicans disagree of the spreading of slavery and would take this issue to Congress,whenever they can,to stop its expansion.They viewed slavery as an a problem that would last forever,and thought the problem would soon lead to extinction (http://www.tulane.edu/~latner/Background/BackgroundElection.html). As for the Democrats,they were pro-slavery party.They viewed slavery was good not only for the slave holder,but also for the slave(John C. Calhoun).In the 1850s Abraham Lincoln said that slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” but later on in his first Inaugural Address he said that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.”Abraham Lincoln personally didn't like slavery but as a Republican he wished to abolish it.But as the President of America,he made a promise to the Constitution,which protected slavery (http://www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation). Therefore the tension that rose from slavery resulted in constant fighting of the Republicans and Democrats.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History
    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    History

    1. The debate over the expansion of slavery influenced the election of 1852. 2. The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed voters to allow or prohibit slavery. 3. Pro-slavery and antislavery groups clashed violently in what became known as “Bleeding Kansas.”…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    the great debate
    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page

    the great debate

    David Souter was born in Melrose, Massachusetts, on September 17, 1939 into a wealthy family. After graduating from Harvard Law School in 1966, Souter joined private practice Concord law firm of Orr and Reno. Souter based his decision at Orr and Reno. Souter practiced a wide variety of law ranging from corporate law to general litigation. After two years of disliking private practice, Souter eagerly accepted a position as attorney general of New Hampshire in 1968.By 1973, Souter was appointed associate justice of the supreme court of New Hampshire. President Bush appointed Souter to the U.S. Court of Appeals in 1990, most his decisions were in agreement with Sandra Day O’Connor. Souter was a republican and held close ties with George H.W. Bush. Souter was a strong supporter of the Republican Party and supported abortion and declared hate crime sentencing without a jury unconstitutional in June of 2000.David Souter was an old fashioned conservative man and a frugal New-Englander. His religious affiliated as an Episcopalian, and was a member of the Episcopalian church and part of the Anglican Communion.…

    • 331 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Civil war political system
    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Civil war political system

    The next cause is the Fugitive Slave Act. This was a law passed in 1850 stating that every runaway slave must be captured and turned back in to its master. I think that this is a cause of the civil war because some slaves were actually free. So if there was a black person somewhere where black people usually aren’t then someone would tell on that person and they would go back to being a slave. Anti-slavery people hated this because they wanted slavery to be done with and they thought that it wasn’t fair that even if a slave became free they never got any proof that they were free so if someone turned them in there was no way for the free slave to prove that they have actually been freed. So this of course made the anti-slavery people mad and there was probably fighting and arguing. This causes even more tension build up between the pro-slavery and the anti-slavery people.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is The South Better Than South
    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Is The South Better Than South

    Some conflict ascended between pro-slavery and anti-slavery pioneers. The aftermath of this conflict led to Bleeding Kansas. This bill became part of the political whirlwind that split 2 major political parties. This also worsened the relationship between the North and South. The Dred Scott case was about a man named Dred Scott who wanted to be emancipated. His reason was that he used to live in a free state with his owner but then they moved to Missouri, which is known as a slave state. The decision made during the case made abolitionists angry and made the tension between North and South more worse, eventually causing the Civil War 3 years later. Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president of the United States. When he was elected he was able to get several Southern states to break away before his inaugural ceremony. Abraham Lincoln did not like the captivity of slaves but the South did so they did not like Abraham…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Most Significant Cause Of The Civil War
    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Most Significant Cause Of The Civil War

    The most significant cause of the American Civil War was the inauguration of Abraham Lincoln. Because of Abraham Lincoln’s views on slavery, the emancipation proclamation, and the formation of different parties, the Civil War began. With Lincoln’s views opposed to slavery, it caused a lot of disagreement with some of the states. Abe believed that blacks should have equal rights, and that they should be treated the same as everyone else. He tried to stop the spreading of slavery and to try to put an end to it all together. He released a document called the Emancipation Proclamation. In it, he gives several million slaves freedom. He aims the document towards the south. It did…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics